Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Court: karnataka Page 5 of about 13,227 results (0.220 seconds)

Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR3013; 1996(1)KarLJ92

..... adjudicated pre-existing rights and the effect of such adjudication cannot be interfered with except in judicial process such as appeal, review etc. section 8a of the amending act insofar as it prescribes that the liability already accrued shall be deemed to be wholly discharged is invalid and is required to be struck down. the state government ..... ending with august 11, 1988, the date on which the writ of mandamus was issued. the state government cannot take shield behind the provisions of amended section 8a of the act and refuse to comply with the writ of mandamus....it is futile to claim that the writ of mandamus is obeyed or honoured by providing that ..... part providesthat any amount due or payable by the state government by way of such reimbursement or indemnification shall be deemed to bewholly discharged.on facts: the amendment of section 8a cannot nullify the effect of writ of mandamus issued by this court and the respondents cannot decline to reimburse or indemnify the company for the .....

Chandrasekharappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the pld banks shall be merged with the kscld bank as a separate wing.10. when all this was happening section 128a of the act came to be introduced by the karnataka co-operative societies (amendment) act, 1975, (karnataka act no. 39 of 1975). in the year 1975, by insertion of that section, the state government was empowered to create a common cadre ..... control matters of discipline and service conditions of the staff of such co-operative societies.11. it may be useful to mention here that section 128a of the act itself came to be amended subsequently in 1984 by an ordinance, with which we may not seriously concern ourselves. what should be noticed is that on april 15, 1977, in exercise of ..... dated 22-2-1978 is not by itself an order of recruitment. such a direction can be given by the government in terms of section 30b of the act, as it was before its; amendment in 1978, as long as it is in public interest.18. mr. r.u. goulay & mr. s.l. simha, appearing for the petitioners, contended that .....

Muruli Touring Talkies and Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Etc.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1979Kant162

..... the learned government advocate requested for adjournment of the cases which was granted. on the next date of hearing, he submitted that the state government has agreed to amend r. 96(5) and r. 107(1)(b) of the rules suitably bearing in mind the contentions urged for the petitioners. he also submitted that he ..... reasonable and substantial distinction having regard to the purpose of the law. 13. in the present case, having regard to the object and purpose of the act which is to regulate exhibition of cinematograph films, it cannot be said that permanent cinemas, semi-permanent cinemas and touring cinemas are in the same position. ..... any outline development plan or comprehensive development plan prepared for the area by a competent authority under s. 4(c) of a karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 or the local authority concerned: provided that where an outline or comprehensive development has not been prepared existing predominantly commercial areas shall be taken into consideration. .....

Sharanappaswamy Gowda by Lrs. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR627; 1984(2)KarLJ382

..... , which however did not prevent government from framing a fresh rule on the same topic. in that view, government framed the mysore irrigation (levy of water rates) (amendment) rules, 1971 ('new rule') on 13-7-1971 expressly giving it retrospective effect from 1-7-1965.7. on the basis of the new rule and the purported ..... government for supply of water from an irrigation work maintained by government.3. the uniform karnataka irrigation (levy of betterment contribution and water rate) act, 1957 (karnataka act 28 of 1957) ('the act') enacted by the new state to regulate the levy of betterment contribution and water rate in the state, came into force on 31-10-1957 ..... of water rate for the supply of water from irrigation works in accordance with the rates to be fixed by government in accordance with the rules made thereto under the act. for the said purpose, government framed the karnatakairrigation (levy of water rates) rules, 1965 ('the rules') which came into force from 1-7-1965. the .....

Krishna Bhat (Deceased) by His L.R. Vs. State Through Land Tribunal an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(6)KarLJ153

..... of 1990, the constitution of the appellate authority was abolished and parties were permitted to file a civil petition before this court under section 17 of the amended act, 1990. accordingly, petitioner has filed a civil petition before this court in no. 12256 of 1991 and the same was converted into the instant writ ..... l.r.a. no. 74 of 1989. when the said appeal was pending adjudication before the appellate authority, gulbarga, in view of the subsequent amendment to the land reforms act, petitioner has presented a civil petition before this court in no. 12256 of 1991 which was converted into the instant writ petition.3. i have ..... six places. the land tribunal after giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner and after conducting enquiry as contemplated under the relevant provisions of the certain inams abolition act and certain inams abolition rules, 1979 and after critical evaluation of the oral and documentary evidence available on file, has rejected the claim made by petitioner, .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Yellappa Hanamappa Arasal

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR4114

..... into force on 2442-19756. it appears to me that both the tahsildar as well as the district judge have committed an error in appreciating the provisions of the amendment act. by act 13 of 1978 it was specifically stated that all pending applications made under sub-section (1) of section 7 shall not have effect and shall abate after the coming ..... the other provisions shall be deemed to have come into force on the twenty-fourth day of december 1975.4. the savings section extracted above is section 5 in the amendment act which came into force on 24-12-1975. the effect of this provision is that on and after 24-12-1975, no re-grant order shall be made under ..... relating to regrant of land to unauthorised holders under the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 7 of the principal act as it stood prior to the commencement of this act shall not have effect and shall abate.'though the amendment act was published in karnataka gazette on 7-8-1978, never the less sub-section (2) of section 1 provided that .....

Subramani Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR3139; 1995(6)KarLJ476

..... had been done solely to decide on the scope and applicability of the first proviso to section 6(1) and its explanation, inserted into the la. act by the l.a. (amendment) act, 1984. such examination cannot, therefore, be understood as laying down that notwithstanding the lapse of time or laches in raising a legal ground in a proceeding ..... supreme court has clearly laid down in tlr 1995 kar 1962 posing the question as follows:'whether in view of the definition of 'public purpose' introduced by the amending act 68 of 1984 in section 3(f)(vi) it is open to the appropriate government to acquire land for co-operative society for housing scheme without making proper ..... in force in any state: (underlining supplied)to the same effect the state of karnataka has passed an act no. 17/61 which is called the land acquisition (karnataka extension and amendment) act, 1961 substituting clause (f) in the original act. with regard to this case we are concerned with section 3(f)(viii)(b), which reads as follows .....

Dr. G.N. Shivashankar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR4410; 1991(3)KarLJ4

..... the other hand, that this period has to be excluded having regard to the amendment to the land acquisition act as it operates in this state [land acquisition (mysore extension and amendment) act xvii of 1961 as amended by land acquisition (mysore amendment and validation) act x of 1968]. the relevant portion of section 6 reads thus:'provided that no ..... respect of any particular land covered by a notification under sub-section (1) of section 4, published after the commencement of the land acquisition (mysore amendment and validation) act, 1967, shall be made after the expiry of three years from the date of such publication.explanation - in computing the period of three years specified ..... , mysore district. these lands belong to the appellant. on 4th march 1985 a notification was issued under section 4(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894, to acquire the lands for the public purpose of the regional silk research centre. a notification dated 4th december 1986 was issued under section 6 of .....

Veeragouda and ors. Vs. Shantakumar @ Shantappagowda

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR887

..... issues even of law depends upon the decision of issues of fact, would result in a lop-sided trial of the suit.10. rule (2) has been substituted by cpc amendment act 104/1976 which came into effect from 1.2.1977. it reads as under:2. court to pronounce judgment on all issues.- (1) notwithstanding that a case may be ..... of the then munsiff (now civil judge (jr.dn.) and civil judge (now civil judge sr.dn.). but, after the city civil court act, 1979 came into force, section 11 of the cfsv act has not been amended. therefore, there is no bar for the court below to try the issue along with other issues. the burden is on the plaintiffs to ..... the fee payable are contained in the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act, 1958. therefore, the issue relating to valuation of suits and court fee payable on suits are to be determined under the said act.12. the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act, 1958 was enacted to amend and consolidate the laws relating to court fees and valuation of suits .....

Vasanthakumar Shetty Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR3717; 2003(3)KarLJ102

..... use of the members of his family: provided that in the case of a person who is a member on the date of commencement of the karnataka panchayat raj (third amendment) act, 1997, he shall incur disqualification under this clause if he fails to provide such a sanitary latrine within six months from such date, or'. the said proviso has been ..... to vote and contest in the election to the panchayats on the ground that they do not possess sanitary latrine is arbitrary and unreasonable. the restriction imposed under this amendment act on a voter has no nexus with the object of the enactment.10. hence, i am of the considered view that the ..... i propose to deal with the contention regarding the validity of section 12(j) of the act.2. karnataka panchayat raj act, has been enacted by the state of karnataka in view of the constitutional mandate under the constitution 73rd amendment act, 1992. the object of the amendment; is to establish a three tier panchayat raj system in the state with elected bodies at .....