Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Court: karnataka kalaburagi Page 4 of about 79 results (0.212 seconds)

Jul 11 2023 (HC)

Sri.ajeet S/o Babu Saliyan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .p.no.200434/2017 between: pavankumar s/o mithalal jain age:52-years, occ:business r/o. akkamahadevi road, near anand hospital circle vijaypur dist:vijayapur (amended as per court order dated58.2020) ...petitioner (by sri. vinayak apte., advocate) and1. the state of karnataka represented by its principal secretary department iof muncipal ..... the compensation to be payable in terms of sections 26 and 28 of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 (for short, act of 2013 ). the petitioners in those petitions arrived at a compromise and a compromise petition was filed in the aforesaid writ petitions on 20 ..... any land designated in the master plan for public purposes by agreement or under the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement act as in force in the state. the explanation of sub-section (1) of section 69 indicates that designated for public purpose means designated for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 2020 (HC)

Smt Ismailbee Vs. Mehtab Saheb

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... act, the words or by any provision of transfer of property act, 1882 has made it clear that the document of which ..... the case of sale. therefore, in case of immovable property, section 54 of transfer of property act, 1882 as to the registration or delivery of possession apply. 3125. in view of amendment to section 49 of the registration act, 1908 brought about by an amending act no.21 of 1929, which by inserting in section 49 of the registration ..... in the high court of karnataka r kalaburagi bench dated this the22d day of october, 2020 before the hon ble mr.justice p.n.desai regular second appeal no.868/2007 between: smt. ismailbee w/o. mohd. khaja saheb aged60years, occ: household, r/o. hirapur, tq. & dist. gulbarga -585 103 . appellant (by sri ameet kumar deshpande., .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2023 (HC)

Smt.chetna W/o Anant Jain Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .p.no.200434/2017 between: pavankumar s/o mithalal jain age:52-years, occ:business r/o. akkamahadevi road, near anand hospital circle vijaypur dist:vijayapur (amended as per court order dated58.2020) ...petitioner (by sri. vinayak apte., advocate) and1. the state of karnataka represented by its principal secretary department iof muncipal ..... the compensation to be payable in terms of sections 26 and 28 of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 (for short, act of 2013 ). the petitioners in those petitions arrived at a compromise and a compromise petition was filed in the aforesaid writ petitions on 20 ..... any land designated in the master plan for public purposes by agreement or under the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement act as in force in the state. the explanation of sub-section (1) of section 69 indicates that designated for public purpose means designated for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2023 (HC)

Kamalkumar S/o Mithalal Jain Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .p.no.200434/2017 between: pavankumar s/o mithalal jain age:52-years, occ:business r/o. akkamahadevi road, near anand hospital circle vijaypur dist:vijayapur (amended as per court order dated58.2020) ...petitioner (by sri. vinayak apte., advocate) and1. the state of karnataka represented by its principal secretary department iof muncipal ..... the compensation to be payable in terms of sections 26 and 28 of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 (for short, act of 2013 ). the petitioners in those petitions arrived at a compromise and a compromise petition was filed in the aforesaid writ petitions on 20 ..... any land designated in the master plan for public purposes by agreement or under the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement act as in force in the state. the explanation of sub-section (1) of section 69 indicates that designated for public purpose means designated for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2023 (HC)

Madanlal S/o. Mithalal Jain Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .p.no.200434/2017 between: pavankumar s/o mithalal jain age:52-years, occ:business r/o. akkamahadevi road, near anand hospital circle vijaypur dist:vijayapur (amended as per court order dated58.2020) ...petitioner (by sri. vinayak apte., advocate) and1. the state of karnataka represented by its principal secretary department iof muncipal ..... the compensation to be payable in terms of sections 26 and 28 of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 (for short, act of 2013 ). the petitioners in those petitions arrived at a compromise and a compromise petition was filed in the aforesaid writ petitions on 20 ..... any land designated in the master plan for public purposes by agreement or under the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement act as in force in the state. the explanation of sub-section (1) of section 69 indicates that designated for public purpose means designated for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2023 (HC)

Anandkumar S/o Mithalal Jain Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .p.no.200434/2017 between: pavankumar s/o mithalal jain age:52-years, occ:business r/o. akkamahadevi road, near anand hospital circle vijaypur dist:vijayapur (amended as per court order dated58.2020) ...petitioner (by sri. vinayak apte., advocate) and1. the state of karnataka represented by its principal secretary department iof muncipal ..... the compensation to be payable in terms of sections 26 and 28 of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 (for short, act of 2013 ). the petitioners in those petitions arrived at a compromise and a compromise petition was filed in the aforesaid writ petitions on 20 ..... any land designated in the master plan for public purposes by agreement or under the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement act as in force in the state. the explanation of sub-section (1) of section 69 indicates that designated for public purpose means designated for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2023 (HC)

Anantkumar S/o. Kamal Kumar Jain Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .p.no.200434/2017 between: pavankumar s/o mithalal jain age:52-years, occ:business r/o. akkamahadevi road, near anand hospital circle vijaypur dist:vijayapur (amended as per court order dated58.2020) ...petitioner (by sri. vinayak apte., advocate) and1. the state of karnataka represented by its principal secretary department iof muncipal ..... the compensation to be payable in terms of sections 26 and 28 of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 (for short, act of 2013 ). the petitioners in those petitions arrived at a compromise and a compromise petition was filed in the aforesaid writ petitions on 20 ..... any land designated in the master plan for public purposes by agreement or under the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement act as in force in the state. the explanation of sub-section (1) of section 69 indicates that designated for public purpose means designated for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2023 (HC)

Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd., Vs. A Prabhakara Reddy

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... 226 and 227 of the constitution. (2) interlocutory orders, passed by the courts subordinate to the high court, against which remedy of revision has been excluded by the cpc amendment act no.46 of 1999 are nevertheless open to challenge in, and continue to be subject to, certiorari and supervisory jurisdiction of the high court. (3) certiorari, under article ..... as specified in the schedule. (2) the commercial division and commercial court shall follow the provisions of the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), as amended by this act, in the trial of a suit in respect of a commercial dispute of a specified value. (3) where any provision of any rule of the jurisdictional high court ..... frequently arise before the high courts. we sum up our conclusions in a nutshell, even at the risk of repetition and state the same as hereunder:- (1) amendment by act no.46 of 1999 with effect from 01.07.2002 in section 115 of code of civil procedure cannot and does not affect in any manner the jurisdiction of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2015 (HC)

Moahmmed @ mohd.haneef Vs. Mallayya @ Mallappa Anr S/O Mashappa Kalano ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... accepted for the reason that a light motor vehicle includes a light motor transport vehicle and also transport vehicle. there was no necessity to make any amendment. the amended act no.54 of 1994 of central motor vehicle rules does not exclude the light motor transport vehicle for the aforesaid reasons.11. anyhow, the learned ..... not exceed 7,500 kgs., though, it excludes the other vehicles referred to in section 2(21) of the act. *the provisions of motor vehicles act were amended by amendment act 54 of 1994. so under the aforesaid amendment, medium goods vehicle, medium passenger motor vehicle, heavy goods vehicle and heavy passenger motor vehicle were also included in ..... of learned counsel for the appellant that a light motor vehicle, which is also a transport vehicle, is not included in the definition by act 54 of 1994, motor vehicle amendment act. therefore, it is contended that a light motor transport vehicle does not fall within the purview of a transport vehicle. this contention cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2021 (HC)

Syed Abdul Bari And Ors Vs. Syed Imran And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... is deleted. the joint committee of parliament discussed these recommendations and only thought it proper to make certain modifications in the section. that led to amendment of section 115 by the old amendment act. the deliberations of the committee are reflected in the following words; "the committee, however, feel that, in addition to the restrictions contained in section ..... of the suit or other proceedings. 13 15 the apex court in the case shiva shakti (supra) dealing with maintainability of revision petition after the amendment to section 115 under act 46 of 1999 with effect from 01.07.2002 has held that a question needs to be asked if whether the order in favour of the ..... then the application was maintainable and otherwise not. the apex court while comparing with the provision of section 115 of cpc prior to and subsequent to the amendment, at para no.12 had taken note of the recommendation of law commission of india which is extracted hereunder;"12. it is interesting to note that the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //