Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Court: delhi Page 7 of about 19,325 results (1.232 seconds)

Deepak Wadhwa Vs. Aeroflot

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 24(1983)DLT1

..... section 433 of the code of 1877, in section 86 of the code prior to the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1951, and now in sections 86 and 87 of the code of 1908, as it stands amended by amendment act 104 of 1976. the legislature did not think it proper to adopt the rule of international law with the developments ..... of the union of soviet socialist republics in india has also been filed to the effect that aeroflot 'soviet airlines' is the governmental organisation and all its belongings including aircraft are the property of the union of soviet socialist republics. there is no rebuttal by the decree-holder. my attention is also invited to article 6 of the constitution ..... in relation to any carriage by air to which these rules apply irrespective of the nationality of the aircraft performing the carriage. since u.s.s.r. is a party to the convention of warsa, accordingly, the provisions of the act are applicable to the facts of the present case as the suit is under a special enactment and .....

Salome Singsit Vs. Airline Allied Services Ltd and Others

Court : Delhi

..... within the stipulated time no satisfactory reply is received from you, it will be construed that you have none to furnish and alliance air shall be free to act / proceed in terms of contract. capt. devi sharan executive director(opsandpers) 15. thereafter, vide communication dated 29.09.2010 the petitioner was advised to be ..... to crewand proportionate deductions will be made from your fixed flying allowances. x contract extension/ amendment this agreement may be extended or renewed by mutual written agreement between the company and you. this agreement may only be amended in writing signed by both parties hereto. any waiver or any provision thereof shall only be effective ..... and ors. vs. indian airlines ltd, 141(2007) dlt 45, in which case this court has observed as under:- 14. lastly it is not without rationale that the flying crew has been subjected to certain standards of height and weight. their job profile demands it. the aircrafts fly at a very high altitude. quite often .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S. Dewan Chand Satyapal

Court : Delhi

..... manufacturing goods and therefore, in terms of the definition of industrial undertaking under section 33b (as referred to by in section 80ia as it existed prior to the amendment w.e.f. 1.04.2000), diagnostic centre is an industrial undertaking. in the said case, the assessee, an air survey ita nos. 87/03, ..... of electricity or any other form of power ; or (c) mining ; or (d) the construction of ships ; or (e) the operation of ships or aircrafts ; the learned single judge held: if a medical diagnostic centre were to be classed as an industrial undertaking processing goods being the films within the meaning of the above ..... the business of survey, mapping, aerial photography and aeromagnetic photography claimed investment allowance under section 32a of the act in respect of aircraft radio purchased. the question before the high court was whether the activity and the use of aircraft radio in the aforesaid business would fall within the purview of the expression "manufacture" or "production" and .....

Precision Fastners Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1989)(19)ECC58

..... screens fitted in motor vehicles as wind screens, rear screen and door screens would be classifiable under item 34-a prior to the amendment of this tariff item by the finance act, 1979 and under item 68 after the amendment, and not under item 23-a (4) as "glass and glassware". after the wind screens were manufactured out of glass sheets they became ..... used as such or as spare parts of a specific mechanism or for a specific engine of aircraft were still covered by item 52 of the tariff. he also observed that according to the decision of supreme court in the case of dunlop india ltd. v. union ..... government had exempted bolts, nuts and screws falling under item 52 of central excise tariff and manufactured by hindustan aeronautics ltd. and used within their unit for the manufacture of aircrafts or as spare parts of air-crafts from the whole of the duty of excise, and this in turn made it clear that the bolts, nuts and screws even if .....

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)106TTJ(Delhi)943

..... learned cit(a) of announcing findings and directions under section 150(1) in respect of the following additions made in the assessment order under section 147:(i) expenditure on aircraft 2,00,000(ii) amount refundable to jindal strips 45,25,628(iii) depreciation on hydraulic excavator 14,92,626(iv) interest on term loan 3,68,219(v) ..... no difference whether the assessment proceedings had become final on account of an assessment under section 143(3) of the act or on account of non-issue of a notice under section 143(2) of the act within the stipulated period. the amendments made in section 143 and section 147 w.e.f. 1st april, 1989 did not in any manner negate ..... as required under r. 5(1a). as to the disallowance of rs. 2 lakhs from out of expenditure on aircraft, the learned cit(a) noted that there was no evidence of entitlement of even managing director/chairman to use the aircraft for the purpose other than business. as the assessee failed to produce any evidence of the business purpose of .....

Vandana Jain vs.rita Mathur and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the party who has broken the contract reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount so named. 32. by an amendment made in 1899, the section was amended to read: rfa no.38/2018 page 18 of 33 74. compensation for breach of contract where penalty ..... runs in the teeth of the decision of the supreme court reported as air1970sc1986shree hanuman cotton mills & anr. v. tata aircraft ltd. which holds that as against an amount tendered by way of security, amount tendered as earnest money could be forfeited ..... plaintiff was entitled to recover rs.5,00,000/- from the respondents/defendants paid against the receipt dated 5.1.2007 and therefore the argument of the counsel for the respondents/defendants that no issue was framed has no force. once ..... respect to entitlement of forfeiture arises only because the forfeited amount is liquidated damages under section 74 of the contract act. that the forfeiture of earnest money is nothing but forfeiture of liquidated damages is clearly so clarified by the recent .....

Kamal Jeet vs.sneh Lata Chaturvedi (Deceased Through Her Lr Babita)

Court : Delhi

..... compensation not exceeding the amount so named. the party who has broken 32. to read: by an amendment made in 1899, the section was amended 74. compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for. when a contract has been broken, if a ..... runs in the teeth of the decision of the supreme court reported as air1970sc1986shree hanuman cotton mills & anr. v. tata aircraft ltd. which holds that as against an amount tendered by way of security, amount tendered as earnest money could be forfeited ..... plaintiff was entitled to recover rs.5,00,000/- from the respondents/defendants paid against the receipt dated 5.1.2007 and therefore the argument of the counsel for the respondents/defendants that no issue was framed has no force. once ..... relief against forfeiture. reliance in support of this contention was placed upon the expression (used in section 74 of the contract act), "the party complaining of the breach is entitled, whether or not actual damage or loss is proved to have been caused .....

Rajbir Singh & Anr vs.jaswant Yavdav

Court : Delhi

..... to receive from the contract reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount so named. the party who has broken 32. amended to read: by an amendment made in 1899, the section was 74. compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for. when a ..... runs in the teeth of the decision of the supreme court reported as air1970sc1986shree hanuman cotton mills & anr. v. tata aircraft ltd. which holds that as against an amount tendered by way of security, amount tendered as earnest money could be forfeited ..... the respondents/defendants that they only received a sum of rs.4 lacs because the agreement to sell dated 5.1.2007 itself mentions in so many words that the respondents/defendants have received rs. 5 lacs and thus no evidence to ..... respect to entitlement of forfeiture arises only because the forfeited amount is liquidated damages under section 74 of the contract act. that the forfeiture of earnest money is nothing but forfeiture of liquidated damages is clearly so clarified by the recent .....

Anoop Singh vs.gopal Krishan Bhuradia & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... compensation not exceeding the amount so named. the party who has broken 32. to read: by an amendment made in 1899, the section was amended 74. compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for. when a contract has been broken, if a ..... runs in the teeth of the decision of the supreme court reported as air1970sc1986shree hanuman cotton mills & anr. v. tata aircraft ltd. which holds that as against an amount tendered by way of security, amount tendered as earnest money could be forfeited ..... plaintiff was entitled to recover rs.5,00,000/- from the respondents/defendants paid against the receipt dated 5.1.2007 and therefore the argument of the counsel for the respondents/defendants that no issue was framed has no force. once ..... relief against forfeiture. reliance in support of this contention was placed upon the expression (used in section 74 of the contract act), "the party complaining of the breach is entitled, whether or not actual damage or loss is proved to have been caused .....

Sh. Sudesh Kakkar vs.sh. Satish Mittal

Court : Delhi

..... for. but no such attempt was made. (at page 933,934) 36. in shree hanuman cotton mills and anr. v. tata aircraft limited, 1970 (3) scr127it was held: from a review of the decisions cited above, the following principles emerge regarding "earnest": (1 ..... reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount so named. the party who has broken 32. to read: by an amendment made in 1899, the section was amended rfa no.216/2017 page 24 of 38 74. compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for. ..... plaintiff was entitled to recover rs.5,00,000/- from the respondents/defendants paid against the receipt dated 5.1.2007 and therefore the argument of the counsel for the respondents/defendants that no issue was framed has no force. once there ..... relief against forfeiture. reliance in support of this contention was placed upon the expression (used in section 74 of the contract act), "the party complaining of the breach is entitled, whether or not actual damage or loss is proved to have been caused .....