Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Court: allahabad Page 23 of about 7,192 results (0.141 seconds)

Bharat Traders and ors. Vs. Special Chief Judicial Magistrate and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1989]176ITR462(All)

..... in every district, there shall be established as many courts of judicial magistrates as the state government may by notification specify. the proviso inserted by the aforesaid amending act entitles the state government to establish one court for trying all cases at one place, which the state government may do after consultation with the high court ..... decision in bajpai's case [1976] cr. lj 514 (all), the state issued ordinance no. 13 of 1976, subsequently converted into (u. p. amendment) act, 1976 (u. p. act no. 16 of 1976) modifying sections 11 and 13 of the code of criminal procedure. the attempt was to get over the difficulty which was pointed ..... . the 'objects and reasons' of the proviso inserted for the amendment brought about mentioned in the amended act were :'under the new code, courts of magistrates are established for every district. sometimes it becomes necessary to set up courts of judicial magistrates .....

Sri Shyam Sunder Shukla, Principal B.R. Inter Collage Vs. State of U.P ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC2022

..... as the ad hoc appointment on the post of principal till regularly selected candidate is appointed is concerned; suffice it to point out that section as amended by the uttar pradesh secondary education services selection board (amendment) act, 2001, provides as follows:'18. ad hoc principals or headmasters. -(1) where the management has notified a vacancy to the baord in accordance with sub ..... , harriaya, district basti (hereinafter referred to as the 'college') is an institution recognized under the provisions of u.p. intermediate education act. the provisions of u.p. high school and irtermediate college (payment of salaries of teachers and other employees) act, 1971 and u.p. secondary education services selection board, 1982 are fully applicable to the teachers and other employees of the .....

Prabhat Chandra JaIn and Others Vs. Sri Navneet Sehgal, Chairman U.P J ...

Court : Allahabad

..... 07.2006 passed in writ petition 864 (sb) of 2004 against which the special leave petition filed before hon'ble the supreme court, dismissed on 17.08.2007. in order to explain the limitation in filing the present contempt petition the averments which has been made by the applicants are in paragraph no. 17 of the ..... ) of 2004. 4. aggrieved by the abovesaid orders, u.p. jal nigam approached hon'ble the apex court by filing special leave petition, dismissed vide order 27.08.2007, relevant portion is reproduced hereinbelow:- "counsel for the petitioners states that the impugned orders have already been complied with. the special leave petitions have, therefore, become infructuous and ..... punishment which could be imposed by the high courts in the matter of contempt. the act, 1952 vide section 6 thereof repealed not only act, 1926. 15. on 1st april, 1960 a bill was introduced in the lok sabha to consolidate and amend the law relating to contempt of courts. a committee under the chairmanship of mr. h .....

The Director General, and Others. Vs. Indra Pal Shukla, and anr.

Court : Allahabad

..... lodged against the respondent-employee registering a criminal case, which was tried as sessions trial no. 307/1995 under sections 332, 353, 333, 427, 596 ipc and 7 criminal law amendment act. the sessions judge, in his judgement of acquittal dated 2.8.1997, recorded the findings that shri indra pal (the petitioner) had left the charge in 1992 and in his ..... . we called upon the respondents' counsel to show as to whether shortage in stock register and the loss caused to the government was on the charge of 'deliberate/intention, manipulative acts of the applicant. respondents' counsel unable to show anything against the applicant on this score. there is no charge or finding against the applicant that he had deliberately manipulated records .....

Modi Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dr. Bharat Kumar ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC762

..... by this order the defendant-revisionists have filed this revision.5. for ready reference the provisions of order viii, rule 1 c.p.c., as amended by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act 2002, is reproduced below:'written statement. the defendant shall, within thirty days from the date of service of summons on him, present a written statement ..... 2002, decided on 20.1.2004, hon'ble sunil ambwani j. held that:'the entire object of introducing amendment by c.p.c. (amendment) act, 2002 was to expedite the decision of the suits. order viii, rule 1 was amended to specify a time limit for filing written statement. the court was given liberty to extend the time which ..... justice but is well-settled that this inherent power cannot be exercised to override the express prohibition contained in that code.'and that, 'in these circumstances after the amendment of order viii, rule 1 c.p.c. the court does not have any jurisdiction to extend the time for filing written statement beyond maximum period of .....

Ramesh Chandra and Another Vs. Tufail Ahmad and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... held that tufail ahmad had no title over the land in question. it recorded that the provisions of section 17 of the unamended land acquisition act were applied and therefore, section 11-a of the amendment act of 1984 would not be applicable in the facts of the present case. 10. the appellate court decided the other questions and found that ..... under section 6 was published, it was not validly taken. admittedly, the award was not made even after two years of the coming into force of the amendment act. therefore, the notification under section 4 (1) and the declaration under section 6 shall stand lapsed by operation of section 11-a of the ..... land vests in the state free from all encumbrances unless a notification under section 48 (1) is published in the gazette withdrawing from the acquisition. section 11-a, as amended by act 68 of 1984, therefore, does not apply and the acquisition does not lapse. the notification under section 4(1) and the declaration under section 6, therefore, remain valid .....

Shiv Kumar Akela, Advocate S/O Late Shri R.D. Ram, Vs. the Registrar, ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC2011

..... one of them, ms. sadhna upadhyaya, is the former secretary of hcba (high court bar association allahabad), which is a society registered under societies registration act, 1860 (as amended in the state of u.p.). they are undisputedly members of allahabad high court 'bar'. these 'advocates'-on their behalf and on behalf of other ' ..... of 'bar council' also.85. above phenomenon explains 'lack' of 'initiative' and 'will' to take action in this direction. it has introduced no amendment in advocate act and/or other relevant place that 'advocate' not in profession-for more than 6 months must surrender his license or in breach face criminal action.86. ..... with statutory powers. it has to perform statutory duties under societies registration act (as amended in u.p.). the relevant provisions of this act are:12-d. registrar's power to cancel registration in certain circumstance.-(1) notwithstanding anything contained in this act, the registrar may, by or in order writing cancel the registration of .....

Allahabad Agricultural Institute, a Deemed University Under Section 3 ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2007)211CTR(All)26

..... ii, allahabad (annexure 4 to this writ petition).2. thereafter, with effect from 15.3.2000, the petitioner altered the objects in the memorandum and now after amendment there are in all 14 objects, which are referred to in paragraph no. 4 of the same show-cause notice dated 8.12.2006.3. the said show- ..... the order dated 20.2.2007 of the assistant commissioner of income tax, range ii, allahabad, which rejects the application of stay. the reason mentioned in that order is as follows:after careful ..... pvt. ltd, agra v. assistant commissioner, income tax and anr.). this decision lays down that the decision rejecting stay application under section 220(6) of the act should contain some reasons to indicate the basis on which the discretion under that provision has been exercised. relying upon the said decision the petitioners have attempted to challenge .....

Dr. Lalit Varma S/O Late M.P. Varma as Karta of Lalit Varma Huf Commis ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(3)AWC3136

..... 11 having 550 sq meter area. nothing amongst these has been considered by respondent no. 2 while deciding the representation.25. that the regulation no. 11 (regarding amendment of the existing map) of new okhla industrial development (preparation and finalisation of plan) area regulations 1991 is complete in itself and has to be construed strictly. ..... an understanding that the writ petition shall be heard after the said suit is withdrawn (see orders dated 4.12.2006, 13.12.2006 & 9.2.2007 on the order sheet). the petitioner filed affidavit to show that the suit has been withdrawn ( with liberty to file a fresh suit in case so warranted ..... interest' and 'transparency' also do not appeal to reason or logic which require 'fair' and equal treatment. in fact noida, by treating the petitioner differently has acted against 'transparency'/public interest.'. by treating the petitioner differently, in the instant case, it has jeopardised credibility of noida in the eyes of public. the public interest .....

Maa Vind Vasini Industries (a Partnership Concern Registered Under the ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC1002

..... lmv-2 and lmv-6 category consumers and not to hv-2 category consumers since it was bound to act only in accordance with the orders of the commission which were otherwise and had not been amended till 24.02.2007. it is also evident from the record that a proposal had been given by uppcl to the government for ..... action may be taken but admittedly, no order was passed by the state government amending government order dated 14.06.2006 in the financial year 2006-07 and, therefore, the chief engineer (commercial), uppcl has acted wholly without jurisdiction by writing letter dated 24.02.2007 directing the authorities of respondent no. 1 to confine benefit of government order ..... making amendment in the government order dated 14.06.2006 but so long as the state government did not make amendment and thereafter acted upon by uppcl, it was not .....