Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... he also submitted that with the transfer of the vehicle from transferor to transferee, the insurance policy is also deemed to be transferred in favour of the transferee and, therefore, the policy was well in force at the time of accident. 6. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... we do not find any force in the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants in respect of non-maintainability of the consumer complaint. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... so far as the plea of the opposite parties regarding sending the vehicle to appropriate laboratory for analysis as per the provisions of section 13(1)(c) of the consumer protection act, 1986 is concerned, we do not find any force in the same. ..... the appeal being devoid of force, merits dismissal. 18. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
..... register of indian medicine (1) if the name of any person enrolled on a state register of indian medicine is removed therefrom in pursuance of any power conferred by or under any law relating to registration of practitioners of indian medicine for the time being in force in any state, the central council shall direct the removal of the name of such person from the central register of indian medicine.? 8. ..... been made under sub-section (1) shall be entered or re-entered, as the case may be, after having satisfied itself that due to lapse of time or otherwise the disability mentioned in sub-section (1) above has ceased to have any force.? 16. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
..... appellant rampal, who is also on bail, shall be taken into custody forthwith to serve out the sentence awarded by the trial court.
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... the complainant has stated that if a policy is timely renewed and remains in force continuously for three consecutive years, then it carries certain additional benefits for the insured. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... we do not find any force in the said submission raised on behalf of the appellant, for the reason that the same was not accepted by the complainant and the complainant has categorically stated in para 5 of her affidavit filed in evidence (paper .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
c.c. pant, member: 1. this appeal is directed against the order dated 22.05.2012 passed by the district forum, dehradun in consumer complaint no. 156 of 2009, whereby the district forum has partly allowed the consumer complaint against the opposite party no. 1 and directed them to pay to the complainant a sum of rs. 2,00,000/- as compensation. the district forum has also directed the opposite party no. 1 to pay a sum of rs. 10,000/- towards cost of litigation to the complainant. the above amount was directed to be paid within a month (30 days) from the date of the order, failing which the complainant was also held entitled to interest @ 9% per annum on the above amount from the date of filing the consumer complaint till the date of actual payment. 2. the facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant - sh. ankit singh had purchased a car named honda city, bearing registration no. ua08-j-9099, on 23.04.2007 from m/s divine automobile pvt. ltd., mohabbewala, saharanpur road, dehradunopposite party no. 1 for rs. 7,11,500/-. the said car was financed by i.c.i.c.i. bank and was insured with bajaj allianz general insurance ltd. on 18.06.2009, the complainant went to the authorized service center of opposite party no. 2 for servicing of his car. during the course of washing the car, the complainant saw in the cars bonnet where the cars built year and month are engraved on a plate that the said car was manufactured in the month of june, 2006. the complainant sent a notice in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... as provided under the consumer protection act, 1986 because it is engaged in commercial activity and the subject machine was being used for commercial purpose is concerned, we do not find any force in the said plea raised by the insurer. ..... , for which additional premium was required to be paid by the complainant and which was not paid by the complainant is concerned, we also do not find any force in the said plea raised by the insurer. .....
Tag this Judgment!