Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 section 155 limitation of powers of confirming authority Court: allahabad Page 3 of about 23 results (0.091 seconds)

Amir Hasan Khan Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1918All266; 38Ind.Cas.736

..... all, though it is stated that the drain is sufficiently deep to allow of a man entering it and cleaning it. all this had happened previous to the present act coming into force. on the 6th of july a complaint was made by the chairman of the board to the magistrate, and the accused has been tried, and the magistrate has applied ..... effect from the 1st of july 1916. the offeree was committed prior to that date when the former act was in force. while the former act was in force, mr. amir hasan khan applied for sanction to build a certain enclosure wall on his chabutra and to cover a certain drain with stone slabs. sanction was given in the ..... rs. 25.2. the first question for decision is whether the conviction under section 185 of act ii of 1916 can stand. the offence was committed before the act came into force. there are no saving clauses in the act, but it seems to me that section 6 of the general clauses act i of 1904 applies. it lays down that where any united provinces .....

Smt. Chinta Devi W/O Sudarshan Singh, Vs. Deputy Director of Consolida ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3325(All)

..... the succession on the death of smt. naurangi. naurangi died in the year 1960 i.e. after the u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950 came into force. shiv gulam, husband of naurangi died in the year 1921. naurangi had inherited interest before the date of vesting as widow. succession will be governed ..... filed by srineta against the application filed by lalji, banshraj, mangala and rambali in case under section 202 of u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950, copy of the objection filed by srineta and the statement of srineta were also filed. oral evidence was also lead before the consolidation officer. the consolidation ..... by section 172(2)(b) read with section 171 of u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950. section 172(2)(b) as well as section 171 of u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950 .....

Pawan Kumar Mishra Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

..... 2011 after considering the complaint, the statement of complainant and other materials on record, prima facie, found a case for commission of an offence under section 138 of the act proceeded to summon the petitioner. the petitioner appeared before the court concerned on 29.11.2011. on 1.10.2013, petitioner/ accused filed an application for the dismissal of ..... drawer/accused has elapsed. we have no doubt that all the five essential features of section 138 of the ni act, as noted in the judgment of this court in kusum ingots and alloys ltd. v. pennar peterson securities ltd. and ors. etc.: air 2000 sc 954 : (2000) 2 scc 745] and which we have approved, must be satisfied for a ..... . 34. in k.r. indira v. dr. g. adinarayana, 2003(4) r.c.r.(criminal) 966 : air 2003 sc 4689 : (2003) 8 scc 300)], a two-judge bench of this court observed that the offence under section 138 of the ni act could be completed if all the above components are satisfied. 35. insofar as the present reference is concerned, the .....

Sundar and ors. Vs. Habib Chick and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 60Ind.Cas.81

..... an appeal and should be dismissed on that ground alone. there remains the petition of revision, and i am not prepared to say that i have not felt the force of the arguments by which the learned counsel for the petitioners in revision, the respondents in the court below, has sought to show that the order complained of was ..... of its jurisdiction to entertain an appeal even beyond the prescribed period of limitation, supposing that in its opinion sufficient cause were shown under section 5 of the indian limitation act, could not be prevented by reason of a mere order injecting a petition of appeal under order xli, rule 10(2) of the code of civil procedure from taking ..... 19 m.l.j. 304 it was held that no application to set a in an order rejecting an appeal under section 547 of the old code of civil procedure (act xiv of 1882) was entertainable but the question of the applicability of the provisions relating to review does not appear to have been there considered. here the time originally granted .....

Colonel Lecky Vs. Bank of Upper India, Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 9Ind.Cas.1023

..... added the words or by any law passed by the governor-general of india in council.' the section so amended forms part of the army (annual) act 1910, now in force.13. in the army act, 1881, there stood a section, viz., 151, which authorized courts of small causes and civil courts in india upon adjudging payment of debts by a person ..... nothing in section 266 of the code, 1882, and section 60 of the code, 1908, shall be deemed to affect the provisions of the army act or of any similar law for the time being in force.23. it seems to us that this clause compels us to exclude section 60 of the civil procedure code, 1908, from our consideration in the present case ..... in the present case no similar applications had been made by the decree-holder.8. we fail to see any force in this argument. indeed, to accept it as valid we should have to read into article 182 of the indian limitation act, 1908, after the words, & c., 5 (where the words in a previously instituted application for execution of the .....

B. Udeypal Singh Vs. Lakshmi Chand

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1935All946; 159Ind.Cas.387

..... of interest and part payment of principal with separate marginal notes. the words used were different and the provisions in respect of them were distinct. while that act was in force, courts in india attached special importance to the words 'paid as such' in respect of payment of interest, and did not regard them as in any ..... was in order to set at rest this fruitful source to litigation that the legislature intervened and act 1 of 1927, amending section 20, limitation act, was enacted and came into force from 1st january 1928. the amended section 20, limitation act, runs as follows:where interest on a debt or legacy is before the expiration of the prescribed ..... either towards, interest or towards principal. the question of appropriation has nothing to do with the question of the rule of limitation enacted by section 20, limitation act. where a debtor makes the general payment without specifying whether he is making it towards interest or principal, it is the absolute right of the creditor to .....

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

..... is not disputed that for giving false information in reply to the question no. 12 of the aforesaid questionnaire, the proceedings under section 23 of the border security force act had commenced. he was charged of making willful false statement to the aforesaid question and it was ultimately proved against the petitioner and the punishment in question was ..... 12 questions detailed in part a, he would be liable to be punished, as provided in border security force act, 1968.8. section 23 of the border security force act, 1968 provides as below :'any person having become subject to this act who is discovered to have made at the time of enrolment a willfully false answer to any question set ..... first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the border security force act, 1968.'since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under section 23 of the b.s.f. act, 1968 for giving willful false answer to the question no. 12 contained in part a of the enrolment .....

Squadron Leader Giri Narayana Raju Vs. Officer Commanding 48 Squadron ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1974All362

..... -in-chief of the central command, be quashed.4. first submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that neither is there any provision in the air force act 1950 or the rules or regulations framed thereunder which requires the air force personnel to wear a crash helmet while riding a scooter on personal business, nor is there any law which authorises the ..... to issue such a direction. accordingly, the impugned instructions, were completely without jurisdiction.5. the air force act of 1950 has been enacted in order to consolidate and amend the law relating to the administration of the air force of this country. in so far as the air force act has made provisions on the subjects mentioned therein those provisions are to prevail and no orders or instructions which .....

Ram Karan Singh and anr. Vs. Ram Das Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1931All635; 136Ind.Cas.145

..... limitation is fixed for such a suit. such a suit is clearly cognizable by the revenue court only, even though the denial of title took place before the act came into force.31. it follows that if the plaintiff alleges that he is in possession and claiming the declaration against the landholder or persons claiming through him, but, in the ..... must file his suit within a shorter period. it means that the plaintiff cannot sue at all, as his suit had become time barred long before the new act came into force. hence the alteration in the rule of procedure would operate as an alteration of substantive law in absolutely depriving the plaintiff of his remedy. this is an ..... a statute of limitation is retrospective in its operation and governs all proceedings from the moment of its enactment, even though the cause of action might accrue before the act came into force. in soni ram v. kanhaiya lal [1913] 35 all. 227, their lordships of the privy council held that in a suit brought on 4th march 1907 .....

Municipal Board Gonda Through Its Chairman Vs. Bachchu

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All736

..... : if there is no exclusion of the general law, or any part of it, from operating in respect of a particular statutory body, it will apply to it with full force.30a. i have quoted above the entire reasoning of the learned chief judge in municipal board, lucknow v. s. c. deb, 9 o. w. n. 461 & it will ..... requires consideration in connection with this decision is whether there is good ground for holding that the operation of section 66, indian contract act, is excluded because it is not made applicable by the force of the u. p. municipalities act itself. 22. the learned chief judge has relied upon an english decision to the exclusion of indian decisions. it will not, ..... , 9 o. w. n. 461, in so far as he held that the operation of section 65, contract act, within the scope of which even according to him, cases such as these fail, is excluded by the force & context of the u. p. municipalities act. 32. in arunachala nadar v. srivilliputtur municipal council, a. i. r. (21) 1934 mad. 480, a division .....