Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: guwahati Page 4 of about 515 results (0.162 seconds)

Mrs. Mandira Begum ( Deka) Vs. the State of Assams.

Court : Guwahati

..... in the case, record any confession or statement made to him in the course of an investigation under this chapter or under any other law for the time being in force, or at any time afterwards before the commencement of the inquiry or trial.9.coupled with the above, section 164(4) reads as under:164. recording of confessions and ..... during trial by invoking its power under section 311 cr.pc. no wonder, therefore, that the supreme court, in jogendra nahak and others v. state of orissa and others (air 1999 sc 2565), held, 24. on the other hand, if door is opened to such persons to get in and if the magistrates are put under the obligation to ..... voluntarily married, on 02.09.2010, one md. iftikhar hussain, according to islamic law and, thereafter, on 21.09.2010, their marriage was also registered under the special marriage act, 1954, at mangaldoi, in the district of darrang. the petitioner claims that she, without giving any information to her parents, had gone out of her parental house, on 13.09 .....

Syed Alam Vs. the State of Assam.

Court : Guwahati

..... expression, narcotic drug, includes all manufactured drugs. 35. the quest for the meaning of the term, manufactured drug, takes one to section 2(xi) of the ndps act, which defines manufactured drug to mean (a) all coca derivatives, medicinal cannabis, opium derivatives and poppy straw concentrate; (b) any other narcotic substance or preparation, ..... rules, the manufacture and sale of such a psychotropic substance shall still stand prohibited by the ndps act except when a license(sic) is obtained for the manufacture and sale thereof, in india, under the drugs and cosmetics rules, 1950 (in short 'd & c rules'). 88. psychotropic substances have several medicinal uses; but ..... they are also open to abuse. hence, manufacture of psychotropic substances has to be regulated and, as a matter of fact, do stand regulated by the ndps act. no wonder, therefore, that the lone .....

Dr. Joy Kumar Singh Vs .The State of Assam.

Court : Guwahati

..... expression, narcotic drug, includes all manufactured drugs. 35. the quest for the meaning of the term, manufactured drug, takes one to section 2(xi) of the ndps act, which defines manufactured drug to mean (a) all coca derivatives, medicinal cannabis, opium derivatives and poppy straw concentrate; (b) any other narcotic substance or preparation, ..... rules, the manufacture and sale of such a psychotropic substance shall still stand prohibited by the ndps act except when a license(sic) is obtained for the manufacture and sale thereof, in india, under the drugs and cosmetics rules, 1950 (in short 'd & c rules'). 88. psychotropic substances have several medicinal uses; but ..... they are also open to abuse. hence, manufacture of psychotropic substances has to be regulated and, as a matter of fact, do stand regulated by the ndps act. no wonder, therefore, that the lone .....

The Union of India Vs. Md. JasiruddIn Talukdar.

Court : Guwahati

..... in that manner or not at all, and all other modes of performances are necessarily forbidden. (see hukan chand shyam lal? vs. - union of india and others reported in air 1976 sc 789). further, it is not proper to the court to direct the authority in contravention of the provision of law and a writ or direction beyond the provision ..... revenue which was also required to be decided as per rules prescribed by the high court.25) on the same ground the decision referred by mr. nair as reported in air 1916 sc 384 in paragraph-4 do not come in aid of the applicant /petitioner.26) the learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner strenuously urged that these batch of ..... the petitioner submits that in fact under sub-section 1 of the section 23 of the act, high court is prescribed as the appellate forum. since the appeals are not filed within the time prescribed, the provisions of order 41 of cpc would come into force and accordingly in terms of order 41 rule 3a of cpc, the applicant /petitioner is .....

Smt. Purabii Dasgupta (Sarkar) Vs. Arun Kumar Dey and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : AIR2010Ass66,AIR2010Gau66

..... verified one. hence it is rejected.today was fixed for passing of order.the fact of the plaintiffs suit in a nutshell is that on 10-8-2001 by using force defendant had demolished the latrine of the plaintiffs and damaged the pucca well, sanitary tank, kitchen etc. standing in the schedule 'c' of the plaint which is ..... results in manifest injustice, that a court can justifiably intervene under article 227 of the constitution.26. considering the aforesaid cases, this court in all assam lawyers association : air 1995 gau 95 (supra) noted that this being the settled position of law on considering the nature of the decree and after being satisfied that the procedure adopted by ..... sandhu : (2003) 6 scc 641, scc pp. 656-57, para 28, this court held:(i) the jurisdiction under article 227 cannot be limited or fettered by any act of the state legislature;(ii) the supervisory jurisdiction is wide and can be used to meet the ends of justice, also to interfere even with an interlocutory order,(iii) the .....

Radhabari Tea Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Mridul Kumar Bhattacharjee and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas579(Gauhati)

..... a parliamentary democracy, where legislative sovereignty rests with parliament, while administration is left to the executive government, subject to a measure of control by parliament through its power to force a change of government. like the government, the directors will be answerable to 'parliament' constituted by the general meeting. but in practice (again like the government), ..... and the company is ruled by the majority. the procedural character of the rule, in foss (supra), was explained by jenkins l.j. in the edwards v. halliwell [1950] 2 all er 1064, 1066 (ca) thus: 'the rule in foss v. harbottle, as i understand it, comes to no more than this. first, the proper ..... deviated by another division bench of the madras high court in t.a.k. mohideen pichai taraganar v. tinnevelly mills co. ltd. air 1928 mad 571, wherein the regulatory nature of the companies act vis-a-vis common law, was pointed out and held that the general right to institute a suit cannot be considered to be taken .....

R.S. Sodhi and anr. and Vs. Partha Pratim Saikia

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : [2009]151CompCas583(Gauhati)

..... law.166. though mr. g.n sahewalla, learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the complainant, has placed reliance, on jaikrishnadas manhordas desai v. state of bombay air 1960 sc 889, to sustain prosecution of all the accused persons, it needs to be noted that jaikrishnadas manhordas desai (supra) is a case, where the company as ..... knowledge of the accused, then, he has to prove them.152. it needs to be borne in mind that in jaikrishnadas manhordas desai v. state of bombay air 1960 sc 889, the supreme court held that to establish a charge of criminal breach of trust, prosecution is not obliged to prove precise mode of conversion, ..... made even clearer than in the case to which i have referred. section 46 of the solicitors' act, 1932, provided that: 'any person, not having 'in force, a practising certificate, who wilfully pretends to be' ...qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor, shall be liable on summary conviction to a penalty.... 'avory, j. said: .....

Sushital Dhar and anr. Vs. Panna Lal Ghosh

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : AIR2009Gau174

..... alia, that sadhu singh (supra) did not cull down the proper law relating to order ii, rule 2 finds no place, rather the submissions of mr. biswas has some force, inter alia, that the cause of action of the parent still filed by the plaintiff and the cause of action of the subsequent suit are totally different and distinct and ..... way of placing the plaint in evidence in the second suit. not only that in the said judgment there is no discussion regarding the case of bengal water proof ltd. : air 1997 sc 1398 (supra) except the statement that the above position was illuminatingly highlighted by the apex court in bengal water proof ltd. v. bombay waterproof . (supra) was ..... conclusion in his favour. this observation was made by lord watson in a case under section 43 of the act of 1882 (corresponding to order ii, rule 2) where plaintiff made various claims in the same suit.16. in gurbux singh : air 1964 sc 1810 (supra) the constitution bench of the apex court stated that to establish the plea that .....

Kitply Industries Ltd. Vs. California Pacific Trading Corporation

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : [2009]151CompCas19(Gauhati)

..... obedience to the power which so legislates.25. this statement was quoted with approval, by the supreme court in raj rajendra sardar moloji nar singh rao shitole v. shankar saran : air 1962 sc 1737, 1742, at paragraph 10 of the judgment of justice j. l. kapur.26. as pointed out by dicey there is a distinction between recognition and enforcement. ..... of money in respect of compensation or damages to an injured party . . . there are other provisions in the act by which foreign judgments could be enforced in the united kingdom. an order applying that act to british india and burma came into force on november 18, 1938 and was repealed by the reciprocal enforcements of judgments (india) order, 1953, which came into ..... of 1937. the division bench of the madras high court in n.p.a.k. muthiah chettiar v. k.s. rm. firm shwebo, burma air 1957 mad 25, traced out the history of section 44a as follows (page 27):the history of section 44a of the civil procedure code may be considered. this section was .....

Thomas Nongtdu Vs. State of Meghalaya

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4395

..... is thus no case of improper exercise of jurisdiction by her in passing the impugned order. on the contrary, had she refused such permission, such refusal would have amounted to acting contrary to the observations made by the apex court in s. papaiah : 1997 cri lj 4636 (supra).8. the result of the foregoing discussion is that there is no merit ..... 169 i.e. when there is no sufficient evidence to justify the forwarding of the accused to a magistrate, is termed as 'final report' (see abhinandan jha v. dinesh mishra : air 1968 sc 117 : 1968 cri lj 97. in abhinandan jha (supra), the apex court also held that both the final report and the charge-sheet are to be submitted to ..... prayer of the i.o. insp. k. prasad dated 19th june 2009 for reasons stating therein, pray for adding section 225, ipc r/w section 25(i-b)/27 arms act which is allowed.later,seen and perused prayer of the i.o. insp. k. prasad, shillong sadar p.s. for the reasons stating therein, for re-opening of the case .....