Court : Mumbai Goa
..... . in length on superior surface and bleeding actively. there was about 1.5 ltrs. of blood in the peritonial cavity. they sutured the rent in the diaphragm and forced to remove the spleen which was bleeding actively, also evacuated all the clots and blood from the cavity and then closed the abdomen. the patient was shifted to icu ..... a panchanama from rubble stones, lying near the temple at jaidev wado nachinola. his evidence stands corroborated by the panchanama exhibit 14. 16. pw.1 mahendra garad has acted as pancha to the scene of offence panchanama exhibit 9 dated 22.3.2008, attachment panchanama exhibit -10 dated 22.3.2008 regarding clothes of the victim and arrest ..... agnelo fernandes vs. state, 1989(2) goa l.t. (11); (2) suresh singh and others vs. state of haryana, air 1999 sc 1773; (3) rizan and another vs. state of chhatisgarh, through the chief secretary, govt. of chhatisgarh, raipur, air 2003 sc 976 (4) krishna and anr. vs. state of u.p., 2007 all mr (cri) 2921; and (5) ravishwar .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... for any action, either departmental or criminal. as rightly contended by the learned advocate general, composite action is not barred. in our considered opinion, there is no force in the above contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order is liable to be set aside, since s.p.c.a has recommended both departmental ..... . dessai relied upon the following judgments: (i) antonio sebastiao mervyn vs. state of goa and ors [2009 (1) bcr (cri) 391] (ii) anupsingh vs. state of himachal pradesh (air 1995 sc 1941). 17. we have perused the impugned order dated 12/3/20012 passed by s.p.c.a., the averments made in the petition, affidavit-in-reply filed ..... 12.15 hours. he further stated that merely because he held the post of police inspector of old goa police station, he cannot be jointly held responsible for any act committed by the station house officer namely shri s. l. hunashikatti. the petitioner further stated that a memorandum was issued to said a.s.i. under rule 5 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... mean for any action, either departmental or criminal . as rightly contended by the learned advocate general, composite action is not barred. in our considered opinion, there is no force in the above contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order is liable to be set aside, since s.p.c.a has recommended both departmental ..... . dessai relied upon the following judgments: (i) antonio sebastiao mervyn vs. state of goa and ors [2009 (1) bcr (cri) 391] (ii) anupsingh vs. state of himachal pradesh (air 1995 sc 1941). 17. we have perused the impugned order dated 12/3/20012 passed by s.p.c.a., the averments made in the petition, affidavit-in-reply filed ..... 12.15 hours. he further stated that merely because he held the post of police inspector of old goa police station, he cannot be jointly held responsible for any act committed by the station house officer namely shri s. l. hunashikatti. the petitioner further stated that a memorandum was issued to said a.s.i. under rule 5 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... court. 54. in the matter of computing the period of limitation three situations may be visualised, namely, (a) where the limitation act applies by its own force; (b) where the provisions of the limitation act with or without modifications are made applicable to a special statute; and (c) where the special statute itself prescribes the period of limitation ..... the proper government . (c) on 13th may, 2010, the special land acquisition officer-respondent no.7 prepared the report under section 5a of the land acquisition act. the report concluded that the acquisition for the airport was necessary since there is insufficient space for parking vehicles and that the acquisition was required to ensure smooth flow ..... s.j. vazifdar, j. 1. this writ petition is filed as a public interest litigation. respondents no.2 to 7 are the air port authority of india, union ministry for civil aviation, the mormugao planning and development authority, the flag officer commanding of goa naval area, the collector, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... 1993) 4 scc 369, another bench of three judges had held that though award under section 11-a was not made within two years after the amendment act 68 of 1984 came into force, the title having been vested in the state, the notification under section 4(1) and declaration under section 6 do not get lapsed and non-compliance ..... of the delay and laches. 19. mr. lawande relied upon a judgment of the supreme court in municipal council, ahmednagar v. shah hyder beig, (2000) 2 scc 48=air 2000 sc 671. in paragraph 17, the supreme court held : 17. in any event, after the award is passed no writ petition can be filed challenging the acquisition notice ..... though the petitioner had approached the court with considerable delay, the writ petition filed by it should be allowed because section 12-a(4) of the bombay sales tax act, 1946 was declared unconstitutional by the division bench of the high court (sic constitution bench of the supreme court)***. bachawat and mitter, jj. opined that the writ petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... entered into between them. he, therefore, submitted that the respondents are not entitled to claim any charges by sending the bill in respect of the police force deployed for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner. mr. bhobe further submitted that there was genuine apprehension to the petitioner that his life was in ..... the said complaints. in support of his submissions, mr. nadkarni placed reliance upon the following judgments : (i) bharat singh and others vs. state of haryana and others; air 1988 sc 2181. (ii) shashikantvs. central bureau of investigation and other;(2007)1 scc 630. (iii) abdul waheed khan alias waheed and others; vs. state of a ..... terms of public will dated 19/12/1996. most of the properties of the estate were declared to be evacuee properties under the goa administration of evacuee property act, 1964 and continue to vest in management of custodian. the property 'boroda molios' situated at village mayem excluding the chapel and residence of the priest attached .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... after considering the report of the anti corruption branch of the vigilance department. 77. we appreciate that the goa civil services 8th amendment rules, 2012 have come into force. we will refer to them shortly. if however, the government is inclined to reconsider its decision in all respects, it can always take the necessary steps for repealing ..... at the interview. 49. the advocate general relied upon the judgment of the supreme court in preetisrivastava (dr) v. state of m.p. (1999) 7 scc 120 = air 1999 sc 2894, where it was held as under : 27. when a common entrance examination is held for admission to postgraduate medical courses, it is important that passing marks ..... only those who have scored not less than 55%. it is contended that the state government have acted arbitrarily in fixing 55% as the minimum for selection and this is contrary to the rule referred to above. the argument has no force. rule 8 is a step in the preparation of a list of eligible candidates with minimum .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... decision of, or determination by any court, tribunal, governmental department or agency or any state authority (including but not limited to the reserve bank of india), having the force of law in any country having jurisdiction over any of the parties or over their assets or over the company and shall include along with any of the foregoing, ..... , can it be said that the applicable law for such purposes would be the law under the said act. according to him, at the most, the applicable law would be the law under the provisions of specific relief act, 1963 as in force in india. shri sonak, learned counsel, also points out that the applicable law cannot decide the substantive ..... counsel further pointed out that in terms of the agreement considering that the applicable law is the law in force in india the respondent no.1 was entitled to file the said application under section 9 of the said act in any event to invoke the terms of the agreement in accordance with the applicable law as provided in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... goa and south goa along with statistics it is clear that the most of the grievances of the petitioner have been substantially taken care of. we find force in the submissions made by the learned advocate general. 14. learned advocate general, appearing on behalf of the respondents, further submitted that all the suggestions/ ..... with the ground water officer by carrying out surprise inspection through rto officers and any person found in violation to be penalized under the ground water regulation act. 8) in the over exploited areas particularly those surrounding the industrial estates, extraction of ground water during dry (peak summer season) i.e. for ..... and control of the usage and transportation of groundwater in the state of preservation of ground water in accordance with the provisions of the ground water regulation act and rules framed thereunder more particularly the remedial measures suggested in paragraph 37 hereinabove. b) such other reliefs this court deems fit in the facts .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... merits, learned counsel submitted that the amendment to clause (cc) to section 3(1) by which the cut off date 20.4.1994 was introduced came into force by virtue of amendment act 24 of 1997 published in the official gazette dated 3/10/1997. he submitted that clause (cc) of section 3(1) as was initially inserted by amendment ..... not applicable to the suit premises, is fully justified and not assailable. learned senior counsel has relied upon: (i) parripati chandrasekharrao and sons vs. alapati jalaiah [air 1995 sc 1781] (ii) shri kishan alias krishan kumar and others vs. manoj kumar and others [(1998) 2 scc 710]. 17. we have gone through the records and ..... (i) choudhary sahu (dead) by lrs vs. state of bihar [(1982) 1 scc 232]. (ii nana tukaram jaikar vs. sonabai and others [air 1982 bom. 437]. (iii) shiv shankar prasad vs. union of india [air 1984 pat. 348]. 12. the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant submitted that the trial court has not interpreted the amendment to section .....
Tag this Judgment!