Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: old Court: kolkata Page 4 of about 2,150 results (0.668 seconds)

Nirmal Ghosh Bag Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2002)82ITD788Cal

..... of authorisation under section 132a was actually executed in 1995 and that being a date after 30th june, 1995, the provision of section 158ba of the act would apply has no force.what is material for invoking the special provision is initiation of the search or requisition of books of account or other assets and it would be immaterial ..... issued and the possession of the cash and the fdrs were taken by the it department. by this time, chapter xiv-b for making block assessment came into force w.e.f. 1st july, 1995 and the assessment of the assessee was proceeded under this chapter. the assessee's contention is that warrant of authorisation was first ..... the time-limit start counting from the date of execution of the initiated search under section 132 or requisitioned of books of account, etc. under section 132a of the act. the later section 158be used both the terms 'executed' as well as 'initiated' and it makes a clear difference between two concepts. under these circumstances, the contention .....

Khaitan India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN506

..... the present case. moreover, if retention was permitted of an excess land beyond the permissible ceiling at any point of time when the west bengal land reforms act was not in force still then, law is to be applied as is applicable when a proceeding for resumption of excess land is proposed. in the present case such proposal ..... for the petitioners and mr. debasish kar gupta, learned counsel for the respondents.6. contention of petitioner is that the west bengal land reforms act and chapter iib thereof were already in force when show-cause notice was issued on 20th september, 2002 by the concerned authorities against the petitioner and therefore, no proceeding under section 6(3 ..... the point by the learned tribunal, according to law laid down by the apex court in the case of l. chandra kumar v. union of india, reported in air 1997 sc 1125, the present impugned proceeding cannot be continued. reliance was specifically placed on paragraphs 90 to 95 of the judgment in the case of l. chandra kumar .....

Raj Kumar Kishorepuria Vs. General Manager, Securities and Exchange Bo ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : IV(2005)BC538,[2005]127CompCas18(Cal),(2005)4CompLJ525(Cal),[2005]63SCL1(Cal)

..... is, therefore, my view that changes effected to the situation in this case are nothing but mere procedural changes, and that they shall apply with full force to the case of the petitioner in view of specific provisions of regulation 13 of the new regulations.15. moreover, it is apparent from the impugned post ..... august 2004.2. by the notice he was asked to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against him under the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992, section 11b, read with the securities and exchange board of india (prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market) regulations, 1995, ..... and exchange board of india (seb1)] to make regulations for carrying out the purposes of the act. in exercise of such power, it first made the 1995 regulations, which were repealed by the 2003 regulations (now in force), providing by their regulation 13 that notwithstanding the repeal, violations of provisions of the repealed regulations shall .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Shibani Santra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008ACJ982,AIR2007Cal109,(2007)3CALLT232(HC)

..... section 163a.144. overriding effect.-- the provisions pf this chapter shall have effect notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this act or of any other law for the time being in force.13. the question, which essentially falls for determination in the present proceeding, is as to whether an order for compensation in a ..... owner of the vehicle is liable to give compensation for relief, he is also liable to pay compensation under any other law for the time being in force:provided that the amount of such compensation to be given under any other law shall be reduced from the amount of compensation payable under this section or under ..... air1997sc4228 ;(v) united india insurance co. ltd. v. lakshmi pramanik : (1999)1callt359(hc) ;(vi) branch manager, national insurance co. ltd. v. hamza 2005 (3) tac 631 : 2004 air -- kant hcr 977 (karnataka); and(vii) new india assurance co. ltd. v. inder deo ojha (2003) 3 tac 14 (all).7. on the other hand, the learned advocate for the .....

Kadem Shaikh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2007)3CALLT129(HC),2007(3)CHN416

..... consequently, despite retrospectively, they ought to be applied to the cases pending before the court or even to cases pending investigation on the date on which the amending act came into force. such application would not be hit by article 20(1) of the constitution.37. their lordships have used the expression 'however we find that the amendments, ..... bench and accordingly the same is rejected.16. now we proceed to deal with the merits.17. mr. roy, learned advocate general submits that the amendment act, 2001 came into force on 2nd october, 2001 and there was a remarkable change in the sentence structure. a new concept of 'commercial quantity' and 'small quantity' was introduced ..... 2001 came into force), the amendment introduced by the amendment act of 2001 shall not be applicable and such cases are to be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the act of 1985. in the aforesaid judgment reference was made to the case of ratan lal v. state of punjab, reported in air 1985 sc 444, .....

Sri Ramala Chowdhury and anr. Vs. Sri Suman Ghosh

Court : Kolkata

..... , makes it clear that though the provisions of the said chapter have the overriding effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained elsewhere in the said act or in any other law for the time being in force or in any custom, usage or contract (express or implied) or in any agreement, decree, order, decision or award of any court, tribunal or other ..... of chapter ii-b to have overriding effect.- the provisions of this chapter shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained elsewhere in this act or in any other law for the time being in force or in any custom, usage or contract (express or implied) or in any agreement, decree, order, decision or award of any court, tribunal or other .....

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

..... no.2) act, 2004. the provision having been substituted completely prior to the issuance of the show cause notice dated 21st april, 2006, it was incumbent upon the assessing officer to issue notice in accordance with the law prevailing on the date of its issuance as the old provision was no longer in force. in support ..... of this proposition he relied on a decision of the karnataka high court in the case of cst-vs.-the people s choice reported in 2014 (36) str10 wherein the karnataka high court upheld the decision of the tribunal cancelling the show cause notice issued on 10th september, 2004 under section 73 (1) of the finance act ..... vociferously argued that the vague assertion that the petitioner had wilfully suppressed material facts with intent to evade payment of service tax was unfounded and i find substantial force in such argument. (60) the petitioner furnished all information that was called for by the department from time to time. once the information is supplied .....

P.C. Chandra and Sons (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Bank of India

Court : Kolkata

..... extension and renewal is chiefly that in the case of renewal, a new lease is required, while in the case of extension the same lease continues in force during additional act. period by the performance of the stipulated in other words, the word extension when used in its proper and usual sense in connection with a lease means ..... showed its intention not to agree on the terms and conditions suggested by the respondent. notice under section 106 of the transfer even if the statutory of property act was issued by the petitioner after the expiration of the initial term, it looses its efficacy the moment the extended term expires by efflux of time. section 111 ..... defend submitted an entitled should that assent possession not of is the be to a granted payment and continuing in protected under section 116 of the transfer of property act. even if the parties could not arrive at consensus, according to the learned advocate for the respondent, a distinction can be seen between the word renewal and .....

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Sushil Kumar Sitaldas Dhirani

Court : Kolkata

..... court having jurisdiction shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or any other law for the time being in force, include a district court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction, at the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding, the person instituting ..... personally works for gain. explanation. for the purposes of sub-section (2). person includes the registered proprietor and the registered user. section 62 of the copyright act: 62. (1) (2) jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this chapter.--every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this chapter in respect of the ..... infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction. for the purpose of sub-section (1).a district court having jurisdiction shall, notwithstanding anything contained .....

Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pte Ltd. Vs. Lmj International Li ...

Court : Kolkata

..... registrar of the singapore international arbitration singapore centre under by the section minister 19c of of the law of the international republic of arbitration (amendment) act 2009 and the international arbitration (appointed persons under section 19c) order 2009, he is duly authorized to certify the award published in singapore in the ..... in this proceeding that mr.minn naing oo is not the registrar of the singapore international arbitration centre appointed singapore under by the section (amendment) act 2009. minister 19c of of the law of the republic international of arbitration moreover, the said declaration has been duly signed and sworn before the ..... enforce the foreign award. to be satisfied that the at this stage, the court certainly has requirement of section 47 of the arbitration and conciliation act has been fulfilled, otherwise the execution application cannot proceed further. under such circumstances, this court is unable to accept the submission that the execution application .....