Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Page 3 of about 2,185 results (0.092 seconds)

Jai Bharat Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Andhra Pradesh. State ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD743; 2000(5)ALT389

..... , and containing such other particulars as may be prescribed'.section 36 lays down :'36. registration :--(1) every wakf, whether created before or after thecommencement of this act, shall be registered at the office of the board'.while one reads these sections together one finds that these sections do not purport that, if not notified in ..... anything contained in this chapter, where any wakf has been registered before the commencement of this act, under any law for the time being in force, it shall not be necessary to register the wakf under the provisions of this act and any such registration made before such commencement shall be deemed to be a registration made under ..... this act'.so, if the property was a wakf property before commencement of the act it will continue to be .....

Coromandal Fertilizers Limited, Secunderabad Vs. Presiding Officer, In ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD358; 2000(6)ALT150; [2001(88)FLR99]

..... same wages and service conditions as were obtained under m/s. east coast caterers, which according to subsisting settlement between them and the east coast caterers would be in force upto 31-12-1992. whereas the company had issued appointment letters to all individual workmen of m/s. east coast caterers and took them on the permanent rolls of ..... justness or fairness of the settlement, it has been observed by the supreme court that it has to be considered in the light of the conditions that were in force at the time ofthe reference. in this context, it was further observed that it was not possible to scan the settlement in bits and pieces and hold some parts ..... the award and also confirmed that there was no requirement of the company to have additional work force in the cafeteria. this being so, respondent no.2 filed an execution petition before the first respondent under section 11-b of the act with a prayer to direct the management to restore him to the permanent post of employment on .....

Colonel D.D. Pawar, C-25415-a Vs. Commander Hq Andhra Sub-area, Secund ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD56; 2001(5)ALT52

..... of the rival submissions, the points that arises for consideration in these writ appeals are-1. what is the scope and true interpretation of section 122 of the army act, 1950?2. in the facts and circumstances of the case whether the trial against the appellants cannot be commenced after the expiry of a period of three years?3. to ..... group offences'. for instance, the offence under section 34, abandoning a guard post, espionage, harboring enemy etc., the offences under section 36 like high handed behaviour of using criminal force to a sentry, house breaking in search of plunder in intentional or negligent behaviour occasioning false alarm etc.; the offence under section 38 dealing with desertion; the offence under section ..... orderv.v.s. rao, j.1. a common question as to the interpretation of section 122 of the army act, 1950 ('the act' for brevity) falls for consideration in both these appeals and hence they are being disposed of by this common judgment. the appellant in writ appeal no.687 of .....

Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. G. Kesavulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD1; 2003(1)ALT636

..... place. according to the learned counsel, the lokayukta has no jurisdiction to take action and (sic when) upa-lokayukta came to be appointed under the act. we find no force in the contention.'coming to paragraph-3 of the said decision, the supreme court was considering the power of lokayukta even though the upa-lokayukta is being ..... public servant. in support of the contention learned counsel placed reliance on the decision reported in young v. bristol aeroplane company, (1944) all e.r. 293, penny v. nicholas, (1950) 2 all e.r 89, a.r. antulay v. r.s. nayak, : 1988crilj1661 and gasket radiators pvt. ltd. v. state insurance corporation, : (1985)illj506sc . i have ..... support of his arguments, learned counsel has taken us to the following decisions reported in young v. bristol aeroplane co. ltd., 1944 (2) all er; in penny v. nicholas, 1950 (2) all er; in a.r. antulay v. r.s. nayak and anr., : 1988crilj1661 and in gasket radiators pvt., limited v. state insurance corporation and anr., : (1985 .....

C.Radhakrishnama Naidu and Oth Vs. The Government of andhra Pradesh,r ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... of sale, gift, exchange, mortgage or transfer of waqf property and the same reads as follows: (1) notwithstanding anything contained in this act or any other law for the time being in force or any waqf deed, no person shall sell, gift exchange, mortgage or transfer any moveable or immoveable property which is a waqf property ..... district in which, and if they have been executed on or after the date on which, act no.xvi of 1864, or the indian registration act, 1866, or the indian registration act, 1871, or the indian registration act, 1877, or this act came or comes into force, namely: (a) instruments of gift of immovable property; (b) other non-testamentary instruments ..... 143: property of charitable or religious institution or endowment not to vest under the law of limitation after commencement of this act:- nothing in any law of limitation for the time being in force shall be deemed to vest in any person the property or funds of any charitable or religious institution or endowment which have .....

Mohd. Saber Vs. Rafiunnisa Begum (died) per LRs and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... is not applicable. as on the date the gazette notification was said to have been issued, the provisions of the old act, i.e., the un-amended wakf act were in force and as per the provisions of the said act, the period of limitation is not one year for the plaintiff and that in any view of the matter in this ..... in the cited decision considered a question of law as to the applicability of section 32(c) of the andhra pradesh buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control (amendment) act, 2005 (amendment act, 2005) to eviction cases pending on the date of its coming into force and the effect of the ..... by virtue of act 7/05 and, therefore, the amended provisions which have no retrospective effect have no application to the case on hand as the suit for eviction was instituted on 01.03.2001. he had placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in noorunnissa begum v. brij kishore sanghi [air 2015 sc 2322]. the supreme court .....

Gutha Hariharabrahman and ors. Vs. Doddappaneni Janikiramaiah, Chatapa ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955AP18

..... were followed by a division bench of the madras high court consisting of wallis c. j. and seshagiri iyer j. in -- 'sanyasayya v. murthamma', air 1919 mad 943 (e). the suit was filed for an account for the year 1884 and the first defendant was asked to account for the management of his father ..... become entangled, the court, under its general discretion, considering the enormous edpense of the enquiries, the great hardships of calling upon representativesof refund what families have spent, acting on the notion of its being their property, has been in the habit, while giving the relief, of fixing a period to the account.'(10) these observations ..... shall be deemed tobe the trustee thereof.'this amendment was occasioned by the decision of the judicial committee in -- 'vidya varuthi thirtha swamigal v. baluswami ayyar', air 1922 pc 123 (c), wherein their lordships held that properties of religious institutions in india are not vested in the hands of the institution, but belong to .....

Maddi Sudarsanam and ors. Vs. Borogu Viswanadham Brothers and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955AP12

..... agreement on 8-6-1925 setting out the terms and conditions of the partnership. the partnership act (hereinafter referred to as the act) came into force in 1932. the firm of burugu viswanadham bros. consisting of those partnerss was registered under the act in 1933. the names of the said five partners are shown in the register of ..... is dissolved as between all the other members.'(9) a full bench of the madras high court in -- 'commr. of income-tax, madras, v. muthukaruppan chettiar,' air 1934 mad 633 (a), on the basis of that section held that, upon the retirement of a partner from the partnership, the partnership was dissolved as between all the ..... and judicially (section 44) and the consequent winding up of the firm affairs and settlement of accounts.'there is no corresponding provision to s. 253 (7) contract act providing for the dissolution of the partnership on any member of the partnership ceasing to be a parner.(10) the learned counsel for the appellants contended that the legislature .....

Eluri Krishnamurthy and ors. Vs. Eluri Suryakantamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955AP5

..... entitlted to arrears for more than six years as according to her the demand was made only after her father's death.in my opinion, there is no force in the contention of thelearned advocate for the appellant. the claim to maintenance arises when it is unlawfully withheld by the members of the family. the widow ..... and refusal are necessary to create that right.the law on this point is well summed up by mr. justice krishnana pandalai in -- 'sobhanadramma v. varahalakshmi narasimhaswami', air 1934 mad 401 (h) at page 405 thus:'the principle of this and subsequent decisions appears tobe that the claim tomaintenance which arises when it is unlawfully withheld is ..... ', (d) should be followed, i wish to reserve my opinion for a future occasion.(10) the next question that arises for consideration is whether the subordinate judge acted rightly in allowing arrears of maintenance for a period of 12 years at rs.200/- per year. the main argument for thelearned advocate for the appellant was that there .....

K. Rangaraju and ors. Vs. Illapavaluri Sitaramayya

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955AP62

..... mulgeni lessee is not entitled to cut trees standing at the date of the grant. the learned judges applied the provisions of the transfer of property act by analogy. in -- 'krishnacharya v. anthakki', air 1916 mad 939 (e). another division bench of the madras high court consisting of spencer and kumaraswamy sastry jj., held that a mulgeni tenant is ..... the observations are very wide and general. but they must be confined to the mulgeni tenure for the learned judges ingnored the principles embodied in the transfer of property act, which are summarised by the full bench in 'vasudevan nambudripad v. valia chathu achan (c)', to the effect that a lessee must not fell timber or pull ..... it'.at page 56, the learned judges further observed :'we do not, however, wish to suggset that the transfer of property act of its own force, applies directly to the present case, but the rules in the act to which we have referred are, we think, founded on reason and equity, and may properly be adopted as a statement .....