Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: orissa Page 1 of about 1,085 results (0.079 seconds)

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... in the locality?(b) if so, whether it amounts to violation of provisions of wild life (protection) act ; air (prevention & control of pollution) act as well as water (prevention & control of pollution) act, and environment protection act of 1986 and for this reason would it affect either the public interest or public injury or violation of ..... gazette declared certain lands situated near the vicinity of the acquired lands as the wildlife sanctuary is an undisputed fact and the said notification is still in force. further the satellite maps issued by the department of forest produced by the petitioners in the public interest litigation petitions, would clearly go to show ..... property, by necessary implication for public purpose, in accordance with the law made by parliament or a state legislature, a rule or a statutory order having force of law. it is inherent in every sovereign state by exercising its power of eminent domain to expropriate private property without owner's consent. prima facie .....

Jayaram SwaIn and ors.Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... in the locality? (b) if so, whether it amounts to violation of provisions of wild life (protection) act ; air (prevention & control of pollution) act as well as water (prevention & control of pollution) act, and environment protection act of 1986 and for this reason would it affect either the public interest or public injury or violation of rule ..... gazette declared certain lands situated near the vicinity of the acquired lands as the wildlife sanctuary is an undisputed fact and the said notification is still in force. further the satellite maps issued by the department of forest produced by the petitioners in the public interest litigation petitions, would clearly go to show ..... , by necessary implication for public purpose, in accordance with the law made by parliament or a state legislature, a rule or a statutory order having force of law. it is inherent in every sovereign state by exercising its power of eminent domain to expropriate private property without owner's consent. prima facie .....

Maa Mangala Construction, Paradip Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2001(II)OLR600

..... factory or establishment (or any person engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the apprentice act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment; but does not include)] (a) any member of (the indian) naval, military or air forces; or (b) any person so employed whose wages (excluding remuneration for overtime work) exceed (such wages as ..... -b of the e.s.i. (general regulation), 1950 provides for registration of establishment by submitting declaration and 10(d) provides for allotment of employer registration code. in view of such provision, it is not an impossible task of obtaining an e.s.i. code nor does it violate any provision of the act, inasmuch as possessing an e.s.i. code .....

Magulu Jal and ors. Vs. Bhagaban Rai and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1975Ori219

..... 8 of the judgment we reached the following conclusion:--'the legal position that existed in the ex-state of bolangir prior to the coming into force of the act on 3-3-1950 was that the thekadar had no right, title and interest in the bhogra lands except that he was in possession thereof towards the remuneration for ..... absence of a procedure the settlement is invalid and without jurisdiction.in pramila dei v. secy. board of secondary education. orissa, cuttack, ilr (1972) cut 469 = (air 1972 orissa 224) (fb) a full bench of this court examined similar contentions in connection with examination held by the board of secondary education. reference was made in ..... take such a step. therefore, the adverse appellate order against them stands.a similar question arose in ram gopal reddy v. addl. custodian, evacuee property hyderabad, air 1966 sc 1438. there the custodian in his order said that the transferee could go and establish his right in a competent court. their lordships observed that if .....

Surendra Mohan Patnaik Vs. Gopal Chandra Patnaik and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1952Ori359

..... the ballot the 25th july, 1951, invalid for another reason. on the view taken by my lord the chief justice, the fellows elected on 25th november, 1949 and 5-1-1950 would come within the cate gory of 'first elected fellows' and they s also be subject to the liability of being balls out. if, therefore, the slips containing serial numbers ..... a certain way, the thing must be done inthat way or not at all.'this principle has been laid down by the privy council in -- 'nazir ahmad v. king emperor', air 1936 pc 253 (2) at p. 257. the privy council in that case pointed out that the doctrine was applied to courts in -- 'taylor v. taylor', (1875) 1 ch ..... not applyto the powers vested in the vice-chancellorunder the statutes framed by the senate, i donot see any force in it. since these were madeby the senate in pursuance of section 19 of theutkal university act, i think they must, forall legal purposes, be taken as a part of theact; see -- 'baluram v. bai parinabai', 11 indcas 351 (bom) and -- ' .....

Kalinga Tubes Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1975Ori18; 40(1974)CLT794

..... as alternate remedies are available. a revision lies under section 25 of the act. a suit also lies under section 42 of the act. we are not impressed with the preliminary objection. the opposite parties 2 and 3 appear to have acted contrary to law and there is force in the contention of mr. mohanty for the petitioner that relief by way ..... nature of the soil; (d) the maximum rent assessed on land of similar quality and productivity elsewhere in the state. (2) notwithstanding any law, custom or contract in force, the rent so fixed shall be deemed to be the rent payable for the land.' sec. 43 authorises rules to be made for the purposes of carrying out the ..... be taken into account in the matter of determination of fair rent. these rules under chapter v are relatable to the provisions of section 19 (1) of the act. the petitioner's counsel contends that the considerations which have weighed with the assistant settlement officer in settling the rent and upholding the same in appeal are contrary to .....

Radheshyam Agarwalla Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Orissa, and Other ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 43(1977)CLT393; [1978]113ITR196(Orissa)

..... commissioner. in view of the concession of learned standing counsel that there is no other remedy against the revisional order of the commissioner, we find no force in the preliminary objection.it was next contended by learned standing counsel that the case is not covered by sub-article (1) of article 226 of the ..... exercise of his jurisdiction was a nullity and cannot have legal force. the provisions of section 6 of the general clauses act have no application at all. that section provides :'effect of repeal-where this act, or any central act or regulation made after the commencement of this act, repeals any enactment hitherto made or hereafter to be made then ..... , unless a different intention appears, the repeal shall not -(a) revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the repeal .....

Sri Kailash Nahak @ Naik and ors. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2909; 2008(I)OLR666

..... preliminary objection with regard to grant of bail to the petitioners. he contended that in view of the new section 85-a introduced into the state act, which has come into force with effect from 01.06.2006, a bar has been created for granting bail to the accused, who is alleged to have committed an offence ..... specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations under the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act, 2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force on granting of bail.47. penalty for unlawful import, export, transport, manufacture, possession, sale etc.- if any person, in contravention of ..... this act, or of any rule, notification or order made, issued or given, or of any licence, permit or pass granted under this act-(a) imports, exports, transports, manufactures, .....

Debendranath Mittra Vs. Gourisankar Sankhanaria and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1950Ori198

..... such a tenancy has nowhere been declared to be the first charge. in providing that section 26 (3) would apply in area where 8. 212, orissa tenancy act, is in force, the legislature cannot be predicated to have other meaning but to indicate that the incident of the concerned tenancies shall he same or similar, one of such incident ..... the present case. the sub-section refers to the area in which chap. xvi, orissa tenancy act, is in force as its coverage. the word 'area' may be construed in a wider or a narrower sense. i need nob enter into that controversy in case.8. it ..... (3) of section 26 applied to all cases, without discrimination, occurring in certain areas or districts in which the section of the bengal tenancy act corresponding to section 213, orissa tenancy act, was in force. the learned judge has not amplified the argument nor has he made his meaning otherwise clear. the observation is not apposite to the facts of .....

State of Orissa and anr. Vs. All Orissa Private Secondary Training Sch ...

Court : Orissa

..... or reorganize certain training schools and colleges claiming to have been established, prior to 14.8.1989 when the orissa education(amendment) act, 1989 came into force. "section 7-f: notwithstanding anything contained in this act or the rules made there under or in any judgment, decree or order of any court the state government shall not be ..... jai kaur & others v. sher singh & others, air 1960 sc 1118, particularly in para- 10, which reads thus:- " one would have thought that after the pronouncement by a full bench off the high court, the ..... single judge. it has been settled by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of food corporation of india & another v. yadav engineer & contractor, reported in air 1982 sc 1302, that "the judicial unity demands that a binding decision to which attention was drawn should neither be ignore nor overlooked." further in the case of .....