Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 294 results (0.096 seconds)

Anita Pandita Vs. Vijay Bhat and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : II(2007)DMC792,2008(1)JKJ402

..... mukerian in punjab, the chief judicial magistrate, jammu has no jurisdiction to issue process against the petitioner or proceed with the complaint. there appears to be force in this submission.question is where the second marriage was contracted in terms of the averments/allegations contained in the complaint read with preliminary statements recorded by the ..... managed to get the marriage certificate issued at delhi in kashmiri samati, kashmiri bhawan as the accused smell that the complainant might be aware of this illegal act on their part.the words used that accused have managed to get the marriage certificate cannot be held proof of the fact that second marriage was performed at ..... view is fortified by the apex court judgment in case y. abrahama ajaith v. inspector of police, chennai reported in iii (2004) ccr 130 (sc) : air 2004 sc 4286. it is profitable to reproduce para 19 of the said judgment as under:when the aforesaid legal principles are applied, to the factual scenario disclosed by .....

Mela Ram and ors. Vs. Shamsher Singh and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ687

..... appeal , it would be appealable before this court under section 100 of the code of civil procedure read with section 112 of the land revenue act.11. i, thus, do not find any force in the preliminary objection of sh. b.b. kotwal. this objection is, accordingly , overruled and appeal held maintainable.12. on merits of ..... order of the tehsildar settlement, udhampur. and directed disposal of the partition application afresh after following the provisions contained in section 111-a of the land revenue act.6. sh. b. b. kotwal, learned counsel for respondents, raised a preliminary objection that the civil second appeal is not maintainable because the order impugned ..... the controversy, sh. o. p. thakur, submits that the learned district judge has erred in directing the tehsildar settlement to proceed in accordance with section 111-a of the land revenue act, .....

Capt. Parveen Rawat and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... their claims. their lordships of the supreme court observed as follows:the relevant chapters of the army act, the navy act and the air force act embody a completely self-contained comprehensive code specifying the various offences under those acts and prescribing the procedure for detention and custody of offenders, investigation and trial of the offenders by ..... within a period of fifteen days or at any time thereafter but before the magistrate makes any order, the commanding officer or the competent military,naval,air force or coast guard authority, as the case may be, gives notice to the magistrate that in the opinion of such officer or authority the accused ..... to be involved in the scam and consequently g.o.c. 14 corps directed initiation , of action under army act 1950 against them for various acts of omission and commission punishable under army act. pursuant to his directions petitioners were removed from their respective posts on which they were posted and were attached to different .....

Mahabir Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1977CriLJ1534

..... as offences under the i. p. c and tried by court-martial and overruled its earlier decision based on such argument.4. it is therefore proposed to amend the air force act, 1950, and the army act, 1950, to ensure that offences triable by courts of ordinary criminal justice in jammu & kashmir also qualify as civil offences to the same extent as offences triable by courts ..... but section 4(2) provided thatnotwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the air force act, 1950 or the army act, 1950 as amended by the said ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken ... ... ... ... the army act, 1950, as amended by this act, as if this act had come into force on the 25th day of january, 1975.10. the question is whether the amendment .....

Bakhshish Singh Vs. Court Martial and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1972CriLJ1630

..... of food, agriculture. community development and cooperation. (department of food) order dated 18th april 1967: dal chana ... 14 bags. kabuli chana ... 46 bags.second charge. section 65. air force act, 1950.an act prejudicial to good order and air force discipline. in that they i.e. both the accused on 11th december 1967. at madhopur traffic check post were found carrying unauthorised goods consisting of 14 bags ..... respondents nos. 2 to 5 herein was constituted to try the petitioner on the following charges:first charge. section 71 air force act, 1950. committing a civil offence that is to say transporting essential commodities made punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act. 1955 read with ministry of food, agriculture community development and co-operation (department of food)) order dated 18th april. 1967 .....

Management of Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... , discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person 11(i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a ..... extended actual benefits available to them under the scheme upto this time.10. that the respondents with malafide intention to close down their unit at bari-brahmana forcefully retrenched/terminated the workers through un-fair labour practices and no worker accepted the scheme with his own consent.11. that in may 1996 the management ..... , that, having resigned from service after accepting and availing of, the benefits of the prevalent voluntary separation schemes, the workers had ceased to be industrial disputes act, 1947 and subsequent dispute of theirs for claim of higher benefits similar to those flowing from the voluntary separation scheme of 1996, was not thus cognizable under .....

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

..... court has the jurisdiction. similarly, specific rules have been framed in exercise of the power under section 141(2) of the border security force act, 1968, known as 'the criminal courts and border security force courts (adjustment of jurisdiction) rules 1969'.27. the following rules are relevant for the purposes of the present petition:-rules 41 & ..... respondents, it is averred that that the petitioner has not availed statutory remedy available to him under section 117 of the border security force act 1968, read with rule 167 of the border security force rules, 1969. petitioner was participating in anti-militancy operational duty in sensitive area of village dedha on 28. 5. 1998 when ..... drawn between 'desertion' and 'absence without leave' in view of sections 18 & 19 of bsf act. similar provisions of army act were considered by the apex court in varinder kumar v. the chief of army staff, new delhi, air 1986 sc 1060, wherein hon'ble supreme court held:-'sections 38 and 39 and sections 104 and .....

Ram Pal Bathonia (Advocate) Vs. State of J and K, Through Its Chief Se ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ415

..... bombay and ors., 1954 scr 1055, another constitution bench considered another similar law, namely, the bombay public trust act 1950 and relied upon its earlier constitutional bench pronouncement. some of the provisions of this act were also struck down on the ground of interference in the religious affairs.the apex court observed as under:'article 25 ..... with double bunk beds, instead of tents which are mostly found in tattered conditions. such pre-fab shelters were proposed to be provided for pilgrims, security forces, sasb staff at designated sites like pehalgam, seshnag, panjtarni holy cave and at baltal;(c) to make all out efforts to provide hot water bathing at ..... shrine to provide eating and lodging facilities to the pilgrims. it is stated in the petition that the organization is ready and willing for installation of air-conditioning of the amarnath cave and to bear the expenses for providing better facilities for the pilgrims during amarnathji yatra.7. the petitioner is aggrieved of .....

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Narinder Singh Mehta (Brigadier)

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1997CriLJ719

..... question in the writ petition. | '18. one more aspect is required to be noticed in this behalf. regard being had to the scheme of section 164 of the army act, 1950, sub-section (1) deals with the right of a person said to have been aggrieved who could (avail the benefit of that section and subsection (2) provides a right ..... cause of action, wholly or in part, arises.11. dealing with a similar question the karnataka high court had occasion to record a finding in d. munirangappa v. amidayala air 1965 mysore 316. wherein the karnataka high court said,even an infinitesimal fraction of a cause of action is 'part' of it. that means accruing of a part of ..... rise to the cause of action enabling the writ petitioner to maintain the writ petition, before this court. he placed reliance upon the judgment of the supreme court in air 1985 sc 1289. indeed this was the argument advanced before the learned single judge, who having considered the same rejected this contention. it has been reiterated before us in .....

Yash Paul Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004(2)JKJ401

..... a direction for his reinstatement into service and release of salary etc. the main ground of challenge in the petition is that the procedure prescribed under the border security force act, 1968 and the rules framed there-under has not been followed. in as much as the petitioner was not provided any opportunity to properly defend himself. the quantum ..... respect to allegations of non-observance of the procedure prescribed under rules, it is stated that the petitioner was charged under section 19(b) of the border security force act, 1968 for over-staying the leave without any sufficient cause. he was brought before the commandant for preliminary hearing on offence report under rule 45 of bsf rules ..... to the petitioner which is too harsh and dis-proportionate to the charge. in a similar matter the apex court in case union of india v. girija sharma, air 1994 sc 215 held as under:' x x x x the incumbent while admitting the fact that he had over-stayed the period of leave had explained the .....