Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: himachal pradesh Page 6 of about 500 results (0.103 seconds)

Oct 07 2009 (HC)

Reliance Infrastructure Limited Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... number of contentions before us. the main contentions are that the tender conditions are required to be strictly adhered to and should not be deviated; the state should act fairly, legitimately and without any discrimination; that since the upfront premium was not paid the allotment should have been cancelled; that firm commitment of equity participation and ..... arbitrary or unreasonable or such rejection is in public interest for valid and good reasons.26. in laxmi sales corporation v. bolangir trading co. and ors. : air 2005 sc 1962, the apex court held that where the tenderer was required to produce certain documents including the profit and loss account duly certified by a chartered ..... of such power or the exercise of the power is manifestly arbitrary (see state of u.p. v. renusagar power co. : (1988) 4 scc 59 : air 1988 sc 1737). at one time, the traditional view in england was that the executive was not answerable where its action was attributable to the exercise of prerogative power. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 1953 (HC)

Balak Ram and ors. Vs. Sita Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1954HP6

..... the first of the said three reports, the particular sentence being the following : 'inasmuch as the wajib-ul-arz has the force of law in this state, it is incumbent on the state to come to a decision with regard to the property left ..... in his la science juridique pure, as pointed out by julius stone in his 'the province and function of law', second (1950) edition, at page 86. roguin took to task austin for his assertion that the sovereign cannot have rights and duties. the ..... will suffice to examine one more, and a recent decision on the point, -- 'p. v. rao v. khushaldas s. advani', air 1949 born 277 (d). the province of bombay having requisitioned a flat under the relevant provision of the bombay land requisitioning ordinance, 1947, ..... , was that the raja enjoyed absolute and sovereign powers and therefore the courts had no jurisdiction to question the validity of any act of the raja. that, in effect, is an enunciation of the austinian and hobbesian theory of sovereignty which, however, has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2007 (HC)

Rahul Bhargava Vs. Vinod Kohli and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(I)ShimLC385

..... not an agriculturist, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, contract, agreement, custom or usage for the time being in force, but save as otherwise provided in chapter xi of the act. it includes benami transaction and an authorization made by the owner by way of special or general power of attorney or by an agreement ..... 3 of the j&k; prohibition on conversion of land and alienation of orchards act, 1975 which is as under:prohibition on conversion of land and alienation of orchards.-- (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force(a) no person shall alienate an orchard except with the previous permission of the ..... 6 of 1988 and as on 14.4.1988 section 118 of the act was as follows:118. transfer of land to non-agriculturists barred.--(1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, contract, agreement, custom or usage for the time being in force, but save as otherwise provided in this chapter, no transfer of land .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2007 (HC)

The Palampur Co-operative Marketing and Consumer Federation Limited Vs ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ShimLC237,2009(2)SLJ117(HP)

..... . the bye-laws that can be framed by a society under the act are similar in nature to the articles of association of a company incorporated under the companies act and such articles of association have never been held to have the force of law. in a number of cases, conditions of service for industries ..... industrial dispute. the jurisdiction which is granted to industrial tribunals by the industrial disputes act is not the jurisdiction of merely administering the existing laws and enforcing existing contracts ..... by standing orders certified under the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946, and it has been held that, though such standing orders are binding between the employers and the employees of the industry governed by those standing orders, they do not have such force of law as to be binding on industrial tribunal adjudicating an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2005 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Soma Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007ACJ1670

..... used to go and get the money from him. she has admitted that her elder son has been employed in police department recently and is under training. she states that air force pension has been discontinued since she is now getting family pension from the police department.5. prabhu dayal, pw 2, who came from the sp office, bilaspur. he stated ..... as was adopted in trilok chandra's case : (1996)4scc362 , appears to be appropriate. in fact in trilok chandra's case (supra), after reference to second schedule to the act, it was noticed that the same suffers from many defects. it was pointed out that the same is to serve as a guide, but cannot be said to be invariable ..... are relevant for the decision of this issue. the insurance company was permitted by the tribunal to contest the petition on all grounds under section 170 of the motor vehicles act. 1988.3. the claimants are the widow, three sons and mother of the deceased chamel singh. chamel singh was riding his motor cycle. this motor cycle was hit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2006 (HC)

Continental Construction Ltd. Vs. H.P. State Electricity Board

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(2)ShimLC453

..... challengeable under the arbitration act, 1940 and not under the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.18. as a result of the above discussion, the petition for amendment of ..... for the question whether the award can be challenged under the arbitration act of 1940 or the arbitration and conciliation act of 1996. in the present case, admittedly the date of the award is 1.6.1992. the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 came into force on 22.8.1996. therefore, the validity of the award is ..... parties. the arbitrators submitted their decision in 2000. by then the act of 1996 had come into force. though the arbitrators have labelled their decision as supplementary award, there is no provision either in the arbitration act of 1940 or in the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 for making of a supplementary award or a revised award etc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2007 (HC)

Jaipal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC295

..... and for want of response in the affirmative from the respondents, petitioner preferred the present writ petition on 11th august, 2002.6. section 38 of the army act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') stipulates that a person who desert or attempt to desert service shall, on conviction by a court martial be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term, which may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1953 (HC)

Girdhari Lal Vs. Spedding Dinga Singh and Co.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1954HP52

..... himachal pradesh under the himachal pradesh (application of laws) order, 1948, which came into force on 25-12-1948. the act was again extended to himachal pradesh, amongst other acts, ordinances and regulations, by the merged states (laws) act (lix of 1949), which came into force on 1-1-1950, but without reference to any amendment. in view of this omission and of the ..... effect of section 5 of the 1949 act just cited it was held by this court in--'munshi ram v. raghubir chand', air 1952 him- p. 60 (b), that since ..... the passing of the said 1949 act, i.e., since 1-1-1950 court- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2007 (HC)

Gabriel Employees Union Vs. Gabriel India Limited and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ618HP

..... calcutta v. p.j. sterling : (1959)iillj405sc , where the age of superannuation of employees in service before the standing orders came into force, in that concern was fixed at 60 years. in these circumstances if the tribunal thought that it would be fair to fix 60 years ..... concerns in which the age of retirement is 60. in several of these this age had been fixed as far back as 1950 while in the rest the age was fixed in later years, that is, between 1952 and 1961. the workmen claim that ..... does not acquire any precedent but if one is needed the decision of this court in western india match company ltd. case air 1973 sc 2650 : 1973-ii-llj-403 clearly rules to that effect. in that case, the company relied on a special ..... modification of or addition to the draft submitted by the employer is necessary to tender the draft standing orders certifiable under this act, and shall make an order in writing accordingly.(3) the certifying officer shall thereupon certify the draft standing orders, after making .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2007 (HC)

Harbhajan Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... states are punjab and rajasthan. entire system is managed by punjab irrigation department.mb link canal passing through punjab area is lined upto rd 50600 where area of air force station, pathankot ends and entered in himachal pradesh. a water fall has been created at rd 50600, after this point water flow through himachal pradesh territory in ..... the supreme court or any other court in respect of such disputes or complaints.8. counsel for the respondents referred to the provisions of the states reorganisation act, 1956, especially section 107 thereof wherein power has been given to the central government to give certain directions.9. parliament in exercise of the powers vested ..... court on october 4, 2005. by referring to these orders the respondents argue that the petitioner has purchased the land in violation of section 118 of the act in connivance with the revenue officials. we are clearly of the view that since the said dispute is the subject matter of other litigations and certain orders .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //