Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Aug-20-1990
..... not relevant for our present purpose. learned counsel for the accused persons has placed before us the landmark decision of the privy council in nazir ahmed v. king emperor, air 1936 pc 253 (2) : (1936 (37) cri lj 897), wherein the law laid down was that where a power is given to do a certain thing in ..... unless the section under which such a notification is issued empowers the authority to give retrospective effect. in accountant general v. s. doraiswamy, (1981) 4 scc 93 : (air 1981 sc 783), the apex court reiterated the above principle of law and even in respect of rules framed under article 148(5) of the constitution of india giving retrospective ..... remedy, and to suppress subtle inventions and evasions for the continuance of the mischief and pro private commodo, and to add force and life to the cure and remedy according true intent of the makers of the act pro bono publico.10. the menace of narcotic drugs and phycotropic substances has assumed alarming proportions not only in our country, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Apr-06-1990
..... appearing for the petitioner has urged that in view of rule 27 of the khasi siemships (administration of justice) order, 1950 the present revision petition is maintainable. in reply mr. bhattacharjee, has urged that as the act is an exhaustive one and the present proceeding not being a civil proceeding, the provision of the above order is not ..... by the constitutional bench of the apex court in raipur development authority v. chokhamal contractors, (1989) 2.scc 721 : (air 1990 sc 1426), wherein it was, inter alia, held that an award passed under the arbitration act, is not liable to be remitted or set aside merely on the ground that no reasons have been given in its ..... very limited ground mentioned in section 30 of the act. mr. chetia, learned central govt. standing counsel has urged that though petition for removal of the arbitrator was pending, the award is bad in law as it was published during the pendency of the petition. i do not find force in his contention as the prayer for stay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Aug-20-1990
..... allowed by order 23-8-1984. after the muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) act, 1986 hereinafter referred as the 'act', had come into force the petitioner moved an application dated 1-8-87 with the prayer that after the act had come into force, he was no longer liable to pay maintenance. it: appears that the learned chief ..... order dated 14-8-89 took the view on the authority of division bench decision of this court idris ali v. ramisha khatun, air 89 (gau) 24 that the petitioner was liable to pay maintenance, even after the act had come into force because the order for payment of maintenance had been made earlier to the enforcement of the ..... act. on 1-9-89, the learned chief judicial magistrate further ordered issue of non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioner, for detention .....
Tag this Judgment!