Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: guwahati Page 12 of about 515 results (0.095 seconds)

National Power Supply Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... v. shyam engineering works, decided by the appellate tribunal, calcutta 1952-ii llj. 315. in this case, dealing with the provisions of section 23 of the appellate tribunal act, 1950, the tribunal held that the right to make a complaint against a dismissal in contravention of section 22 is available only to the ' aggrieved workman ' and, therefore, ..... provisions of section 33 was not given separately, the petitioner was prejudiced in their case on merits of the dispute.4. in my judgment there is no force in this contention. the labour court before giving any relief to the employee under section 33a has to find out first that there has been a contravention ..... preliminary issues first and thereafter should have given an opportunity to the petitioner to substantiate their case on merits after holding that the preliminary points had no force. as the labour court disposed of the preliminary point and the merits of the application by one award, the petitioner was deprived of his opportunity to .....

Pema Khandu and Others Vs. Nabam Rebia, Speaker of the Arunachal Prade ...

Court : Guwahati

..... constitution, its procedure and the conduct of its business. (2) until rules are made under clause (1), the rules of procedure and standing orders in force immediately before the commencement of this constitution with respect to the legislature for the corresponding province shall have effect in relation to the legislature of the state ..... this, all proceedings and consequences thereof are also unconstitutional. no resolution passed in such sitting and no notification issued on the basis of such resolution have any force of law. (xxi) the deputy speaker himself stood disqualified by the disqualification order. thus, the deputy speaker along with other disqualified mlas of inc could not ..... court of pandh reported in (1996) 3 scc 145 and supreme court advocates-on-record assn. v. union of india reported in air 1994 sc 268. 41. thus, where the governor acts as the head of the state, except in relation to areas which are earmarked under the constitution as giving discretion to the governor, .....

Assam Apex Handicraft and Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd. and anr. ...

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : AIR2000Gau35

..... presumption of attempted evasion of tax. therefore, an opportunity must be provided torebut such imputation of attempted evasionof tax. yet another decision on the point is reported in air 1969 sc 401 (state bank ofindia v. rajendra kumar singh). the question for consideration was whether in absence of any provision for issuing any noticebefore disposal of ..... gautam v. union of india (1993 (1) scc 78) (supra) and state bank of india v. rajendra kumar singh (air 1969 sc 401) (supra), a provision of prior hearing under section 65 of the cooperative societies act will have to be read and an opportunity is necessary to be afforded before an order of cancellation of registration is passed ..... explanation to the charges or even to the report said to be obtained under section 60 of the act. the effect of the order passed is that the whole charge is taken by the liquidator and on coming into force of the order the society ceases to exist and vests in the liquidator such consequences impel us to .....

The State Vs. Chand Meah and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1961CriLJ299

..... ii of 1297 t. e.) which i shall call as the tripura forest act.the said act continued on force alter the integration of tripura in october, 1949 and until it was repealed by section 4 of the part c states laws act, 1950 and in its place the indian forest act xvi of 1927 was extended to tripura with effect from 15-44950 by section ..... to the supreme court in a case of acquittal has been left undecided by the constitution bench of the supreme court in the latter decision. but the earlier decision namely air 1954 sc 20 has laid down that an order of acquittal is final subject only to the overriding powers vested with the supreme court by article 136 of the constitution ..... will not apply to a case of acquittal by the high court in view of the decision of the supreme court in state government, m.p. v. ramkrishna ganpatrao air 1954 sc 20 that this court should not therefore certify these cases as fit cases for appeal, even though a substantial question of law is involved, that it is only .....

The State Vs. Chand Meah and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1961CriLJ299

..... ii of 1297 t. e.) which i shall call as the tripura forest act.the said act continued on force alter the integration of tripura in october, 1949 and until it was repealed by section 4 of the part c states laws act, 1950 and in its place the indian forest act xvi of 1927 was extended to tripura with effect from 15-44950 by section ..... to the supreme court in a case of acquittal has been left undecided by the constitution bench of the supreme court in the latter decision. but the earlier decision namely air 1954 sc 20 has laid down that an order of acquittal is final subject only to the overriding powers vested with the supreme court by article 136 of the constitution ..... will not apply to a case of acquittal by the high court in view of the decision of the supreme court in state government, m.p. v. ramkrishna ganpatrao air 1954 sc 20 that this court should not therefore certify these cases as fit cases for appeal, even though a substantial question of law is involved, that it is only .....

V.S. Sundaram and anr. Vs. Laisram Achou Singh

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1956CriLJ1411

..... the outer gate. if legal advice had been taken, the same three grounds would never have been mentioned in the grounds of detention under section 7, preventive detention act, 1950, when they had been expressly held by this court to be illegal that very day.the effect of re-arrest of the opposite party clearly was that the ..... in contempt proceedings is ridiculous as this proceeding is by its nature a proceeding in personam. i, therefore, hold that this contention of the petitioners also, has no force.13. the third contention which has been pressed on behalf of the petitioners is that even though the order under section 144, cr. p.c. was defective on ..... fitness for appeal, unless it was satisfied that its decision has resulted in any grave and substantial injustice vide - 'bhanwarji v. the state" 1955 nuc (madh-b) 3042 (air v 42) (l), or that grave and substantial injustice had been done by reason of some departure from the principles of natural justice - vide - 'krishnakant vyas v. state .....

V.S. Sundaram and anr. Vs. Laisram Achou Singh

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1956CriLJ1411

..... the outer gate. if legal advice had been taken, the same three grounds would never have been mentioned in the grounds of detention under section 7, preventive detention act, 1950, when they had been expressly held by this court to be illegal that very day.the effect of re-arrest of the opposite party clearly was that the ..... in contempt proceedings is ridiculous as this proceeding is by its nature a proceeding in personam. i, therefore, hold that this contention of the petitioners also, has no force.13. the third contention which has been pressed on behalf of the petitioners is that even though the order under section 144, cr. p.c. was defective on ..... fitness for appeal, unless it was satisfied that its decision has resulted in any grave and substantial injustice vide - 'bhanwarji v. the state' 1955 nuc (madh-b) 3042 (air v 42) (l), or that grave and substantial injustice had been done by reason of some departure from the principles of natural justice - vide - 'krishnakant vyas v. state .....

Kanakeswar Choudhury Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ198CAT

..... removal was passed. thus, this case also does not help the applicant.11. reliance is also placed on k. bhaskar v. the c.o. hq training command (unit), air force, bangalore and ors., 2002(1) atj 434, wherein it was held that the admission of the delinquent officer must be in specific, clear and unambiguous terms. in that case ..... servant in his written statement of defence, the disciplinary authority shall record its findings on each charge after taking such evidence as it may think fit and shall act in the manner laid down in rule 15. thus, where articles of charge are admitted there is a discretion with the authority and the conducting of enquiry in ..... talukdar, education officer, by the then colleague at tinsukia under compulsion from shri m.a. siddiqui, the then regional director. i assure that i will not repeat such act in future and pray for mercy. i am making this statement on my own free will without any duress with full understanding and realisation of the consequences." 6. the .....

Krishna Kanta Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

..... for the consideration of the advisory board. the learned counsel contended in the alternative that if any case was pending then, as held in--'labaram deka v. state', air 1951 assam 43, the order of detention would be improper. that case is distinguishable and is of no assistance to the learned counsel. in that case, the ..... the last contention is that the order of confirmation under section 11 of the preventive detention act should have been communicated to the petitioner. in support of this contention, reliance has been placed on--'makhan singh v. state of punjab', air 1952 sc 27. the learned counsel has referred to some observations of the learned chief justice ..... 1950, as amended by the detention act 4 of 1951, expired on 1-4-1952. the petitioner's detention after that date is illegal. this contention also has no force. the effect of section 2, preventive detention (amendment) act, 1952, is that the life of the principal act was extended to 1-10-1952. the period of petitioner's detention .....

Ashok Kumar Sarial Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Reported in : (2003)(2)SLJ29CAT

..... 2 scc 212=1999(3) slj 100 (sc).7. we have gone through rules 11, 14, 16 and 21 of the agricultural research service rules, 1975 which came into force with effect from 1.10.1975. admittedly, on survey of the fact situation, it is found that the applicant was holding a tenurial post. the advertisement mentioned that his tenure ..... to the contrary it was incumbent on the respondents to discharge its duties justly, fairly and reasonably and in conformity with article 14 of the constitution. the duty to act fairly is more imperative in the case of any decision which not only affects the person's right or interest, but also reputation stigmatising the reputation of the individual. ..... be exercised justly, lawfully and reasonably; it is not to be exercised arbitrarily as was held by the supreme court in dr bool chand v. chancellor, kurukshetra university, air 1968 sc 292. it can only be exercised for good cause and only when it is found after due enquiry held in a manner consistent with the rules of .....