Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: andhra pradesh Page 6 of about 2,185 results (0.127 seconds)

Jun 26 1985 (HC)

N. Ranga Rao Vs. Government of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1986)IILLJ1AP

..... i) pertains to navy, military and air force and any other armed forces of the union and thereby empowers the union to deal with the subject in issue. the appointing authority of the appellant is the president of india by operation of s. 10 of the army act 1950 (46 of 1950), for short, 'the act'. therefore, we hold that executive action of ..... and technical personnel under the control of the department. he further stated that the matters relating to the armed forces of the union, viz., army, navy and air force were allocated by the prime minister to sri k. p. singh deo, honourable minister for state and in that capacity he approved the ..... defence is given as per allocation of the business rules as amended from time to time. item no. 2 thereof relates to the armed forces of the union, viz., army, navy and air force. item no. 33 relates to the department of research and development council and item no. 34 pertains to all matters relating to the scientific .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1958 (HC)

Sultan SalehuddIn Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959AP73; 1959CriLJ160

..... as he can.it is contended that the detaining authority ought to have furnished full text of the speeches and not mere extracts of the same. there is no force in this argument having regard to the language and purport of the provision. what is contemplated by article 22(5) is the communication of the grounds which should be ..... the sole basis for satisfaction and no fresh prejudicial act was or could be committed by the detenue. in air 1912 bhopal 6 (e) the detenue was under detention till 3-3-1950 under an order dated 4-9-1949 under public safety act of 1947.a fresh order dated 7-3-1950 by the chief commissioner was made for the detention ..... of the supreme court in : 1957crilj10 (b) placed the matter beyond dispute. thus there is no force in the argument that since the historical background too weighed with the detaining authority in judging the implications and tendencies of the present acts of the detenue and in obtaining satisfaction warranted by section 3, the order bad to law.9. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 29 1969 (HC)

K. Parvathamma Vs. the Commissioner of Excise (Board of Revenue), Govt ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1970AP333

..... necessary to set out the provisions of section 47 of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 which are as follows: '47. (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any decree or order of a court no permanent alienation and no other transfer of agricultural lands shall be ..... the property passes to the auction-purchaser when the collector sanctiions the sale under s. 134 of the land revenue act, reliance is placed upon a decision of the allahabad high court in s. zalim singh v. mt. bhagirathi, air 1949 all 127. it was a case in which after a court sale in execution of a mortgage decree and ..... before its confirmation, an act was passed prohibiting the sale of land belonging to an agriculturist. an application to set aside the sale .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2000 (HC)

Edla Venkat Raj Reddy Vs. Edla Linga Reddy (Died) Per Lrs. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD654; 2000(5)ALT299

..... his name in respect of the suit lands. iti tlie year 1975 a certificate under section 38-e of a.p. (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as the tenancy act, was issued in his name in respect of the suit lands, except the land in sy. no.374. it is stated that in respect of the land ..... conclusive. a similar view has been taken by the supreme court in the case of smt. kavita v. state of maharashtra, reported in air 1981 sc 2084 that an admission in view of section 17 of the evidence act furnishes best evidence unless explained. it cannot be disputed that admissions voluntarily made constitute best evidence against the maker thereof and the burden ..... go into and decide whether the plaintiffs are protected tenants. section 99 of the a.p. (t.a.) tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 expressly excludes the jurisdiction of the civil court.'in the case of mohd burhan (died) and others v. shivling rao and others, reported in 1988 (1) alt 117 it has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 27 1967 (HC)

Chirala Goverdhanareddy and anr. Vs. Election Tribunal, Bapatla and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1970AP56

..... expired.'thus, while s. 19 provides for disqualifiations of candidates, section 14(1) adopts the electoral roll for the assembly constituency, published under the representation of the people act, 1950, as the draft of the electoral roll, for the gram panchayat and that such draft shall be published in the manner prescribed. sub-section (2) requires that after ..... the thirty days aforesaid. (3) the final electoral roll published under sub-section (2) shall be the elctoral roll for the gram panchayat and it shall remain in force till a fresh electoral roll for the gram panchayat is published in the succeeding calendar year in the manner specified in the forgoing sub-section. (4) the electoral roll ..... 2 andh wr 23, does not render any assistance to the petitioner's contention.26. the next decision that has been relied upon is the full bench decision in air 1959 all 359 (fb). that is also a case, where only the question of the validity of the reception of the votes of persons whose age was less .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 1963 (HC)

Ollala Ambiah Vs. Avadhanula Mallanna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1964AP514

..... such as houses and other buildings. it makes no mention of agricultural lands. it cannot, therefore, be said that section 47 of the hyderabad tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 end section 60 c. p. c. occupy the same field. as far as possible, a harmonious construction of the two statutes must be adopted. having regard to ..... within the inhibition enacted in section 47. here, admittedly, the attachment was made with a view to bring the properties to sale. there is, therefore, no force in the contention that section 47 does not tender the attachment illegal.30. sri subbarayudu then urges that nothing pre-vents his client from executing his decree by appointment ..... if authority is needed, reference may be made to official receiver, kistna v. lakshmayya, 55 mad 634, subbarao v. venkatasesha-charlu, air 1949 mad 207 and muthuvenkatarama v. official receiver, south arcot, air 1926 mad 350.7. it is difficult to posit that that test is satisfied in regard to the house at manthena because it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1999 (HC)

K. Sreenivasachari Vs. Custodian of Evacuee Property and Secy. to Comm ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD206

..... that respondent no.2 was a tenant. secondly even if he was a tenant in view of section 9 of the administration of the evacuee property act, 1950 (hereafter referred to as 'the act'), the custodian was bound to evict respondent no.2 and put the petitioner inpossession of the property. it is further argued that respondent no.2 ..... of the evacuee-property which possession is not unauthorised possession. it may be stated that this decision was rendered before amendment of section 12 of the act. the amendment came into force on 6-5-1953 and by the amendment, the legislature enlarged the scope of powers of the custodian. before the amendment only the property which was ..... this case has no application to the facts of the present case.10a. the learned counsel then refers to the decision in abdul sattar v. custodian evacuee property, air 1958 ap 317. thecase undoubtedly supports the contention of the petitioner. a learned single judge of this court held in that case that section 4 has an over-riding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1962 (HC)

Kondapally Vasudev Reddy Vs. Baireddy Venkata Reddy and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1963AP232

..... pleadings set out above, it is more than clear that for want of previous sanction of the collector as provided under section 47 of the hyderabad tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950, the suit for specific performance is not maintainable is made with special reference to the particular facts of that case only. but the same has not been urged in ..... this again cannot be said to be apt or throwing any light on the question under discussion. in akram mea v. secunderabad municipal corporation, 1957 andh lt 211 : ( (s) air 1957 andh pra 859), it has been held by subba rao, c. j. (as he then was) that the necessary condition which enables a transferee to invoke the provisions of ..... the time being in force or in any decree or order of a court, no permanent alienation and no other transfer of agricultural land shall be valid unless it has been made with the previous sanction of the collector.'in support of this contention the learned counsel cited s. n. banerji v. k. l. and s. co., air 1941 pc 128. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1977 (HC)

K. Venkaiah and ors. Vs. K. Venkateswara Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1978AP166

..... , j., in view of the conflict between the decisions of this court on the question of applicability of s. 5 of the limitation act to proceedings under the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950. before the coming into force of the indian limitation act, 1963, this court held uniformly that s. 5 has no application to the proceedings under the said ..... be computed from the date on which the right to apply accrues. so far as art. 181 of the 1908 act is concerned, it was held by the privy council (vide hansraj gupta v. dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co. ltd., air 1933 pc 63 and by the supreme court in sha mullchand & co. ltd. v. jawahar mills ltd., salem, : [1953]4scr351 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1987 (HC)

E. Muni Chengal Rao Vs. Tahsildar, Mambalam and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1988)IILLJ183AP

..... the same offence more than once'. in venkataraman v. union of india : 1954crilj993 the appellant was a public servant. public enquiry under the public servants (enquiries) act, 1950 was conducted against venkataraman, an ics officer, on certain imputations of mis-conduct and he was found to have committed misconduct and, after following the procedure under article ..... clause may be attracted.' it was held that enquiry under the public servants (enquiries) act, 1950, there is neither any question of investigating an offence in the sense of an act or omission punishable by any law for the time being in force, nor is there any question of imposing punishment prescribed by law which makes that ..... act or omission an offence. the purpose of the enquiry was to find the misbehavior .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //