Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air corporations act 1953 repealed section 15 accounts and audit Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 105 results (0.238 seconds)

Oct 30 2006 (HC)

Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2007(207)ELT58(P& H); (2007)146PLR826

..... section 6 of the general clauses act had been applied, no doubt this complaint against the two accused for the offence punishable under rule 132a of the d.i.rs could have been instituted even after the repeal of that rule.thus, following principles were laid down:(i) section 6 applied to repeals and not to omissions;(ii) section 6 aforesaid was applicable to repeal of a central act or a regulation and not to repeal ..... (119)elt257(sc) , for the proposition that omission of a provision does not amount to repeal and does not attract section 6 of the general clauses act, 1897, which is an exception to the general rule that deletion of a provision brings ..... the case before us, section 6 of the general clauses act cannot obviously apply on the comission of rule 132a of the d.i.rs for the two obvious reasons that section 6 only applies to repeals and not to omissions, and applies when the repeal is of a central act or regulation and not of a rule. ..... at such rate, on the unit of production or, as the case may be, on such factor relevant to the production, as the central government may, by notification in the official gazette specify, and collected in such manner as may be prescribed:provided that, where a factory producing notified goods did not produce the notified goods during any continuous period of fifteen days or more, duty calculated ..... messrs rayala corporation's case and kolhapur canesugar ..... air 2001 supreme court 3134, the question as to what is a 'temporary statute', was examined and ..... air .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2008 (HC)

Tirlok Chand Gupta Vs. the Punjab University

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)150PLR326

..... this part, where any body corporate constituted under a central act, state act or provincial act for the existing state of punjab or any part thereof serves the needs of the successor states or has, by virtue of the provisions of part ii, become an inter-state body corporate, then, the body corporate shall, on and from the appointed day, continue to function and operate in those areas in respect of which it was functioning and operating immediately before that day, subject ..... the aforementioned consideration apart, the university is admittedly a corporation and by virtue of section 72 of the punjab re-organisation act, 1966, it has to function under the directions issued by the ..... repelled the contention that it is not the public premises within the meaning of section 2(e)(2)(iii) of the act and held as under:the grievance made in the petition is that the residential quarters owned by the panjab university do not fall within the definition of premises as contained in the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 (hereinafter called the act) and as such the estate officer appointed by the panjab university had no right to ..... according to section 72 if a body corporate constituted interalia, by or under a state act for the erstwhile state of punjab or any part thereof serves the needs of successor states or has become an inter-state body corporate then it should continue to function and operate in those areas subject to such directions as may from time to time .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1987 (HC)

Beegee Corporation Private Ltd. Vs. Punjab Financial Corporation

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1988P& H231

..... 31 and 32 of the state financial corporations act, the additional district judge could not take into account the up to date liability of the loanee. ..... in view of this clear pronouncement made by the supreme court, it is not possible to accept the appellant's submission that the learned single judge had erred in holding that for purposes of proceedings under ss: 31 and 32 of the state financial corporation act, the district judge was concerned with loanee's up to date liability and not his liability as on the date of application under s. ..... 31 and 32 of the state financial corporations act, 1951, for determination of the loan and for the sale of the mortgaged property. ..... 31 and 32 of the state financial corporation act, the court had to determine the liability of the loanee only up to the date of the application under s. ..... 21, 1972, in which reference had been made of the original mortgage deed as well, and held that the corporation was justified in charging compound interest. ..... it may also be mentioned here that even under the code the question of interest payable in mortgage suits filed in civil courts is governed by order 34, rule 11 of the code and not by section 34 of the code which may be applicable only to cases of personal decrees passed under o. 34, r. ..... 1446 of 1987, decided on july 21, 1987(reported in air 1987 sc 1950), the supreme court while considering the question whether the provisions of s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2006 (HC)

Som Lal Vs. Vijay Laxmi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)143PLR81a

..... aside only on the basis of disqualifications prescribed in section 11 of the punjab state election commission act, 1994 which is a special statute and holds the field;(b) section 208 of the punjab panchayat raj act, 1994 stands repealed by section 143 of the punjab state election commission act, 1994;(c) no election petition on a ground, other than those provided in section 11 of the punjab state election commission act, 1994 is maintainable, as laid down by section 89 of this act;(d) section 208 of the punjab panchayati raj act, 1994 is meant only for the purpose ..... cause or proceeding in which the panchayat or the municipality is interested or concerned; or(j) if he, having held any office under the state government or any panchayat or any municipality or any other state level authority or any government company or any corporate body owned or controlled by the state government or government of india, has been dismissed from service, unless a period of four years has elapsed since his dismissal.12. ..... chapter v enlists properties, funds, finance and accounts of the gram panchayat. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2011 (HC)

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... v. lachman singh gill, air 1970 (pandh) 40, to the extent that "unlike the other corporations dealt with in sections 67 to 71 of the reorganization act, there is no provision in section 72, or for that matter in any other section of the re-organization act, for dissolution of the board as an inter-state body corporate, and its re-constitution in the divided four parts of the `existing state of punjab ..... or haryana or to the union territory of himachal pradesh or chandigarh of any law made before the appointed day, the appropriate government may, before the expiration of two years from that day, by order, make such adaptations and modifications of the law, whether by way of repeal or amendment, as may be necessary or expedient, and thereupon every such law shall have effect subject to the adaptations and modifications so made until altered, repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority. ..... v. state of punjab, air 1953 sc 83, that words and phrases occurring in a statute are to be taken not in an isolated or detached manner dissociated from the context, but are to be read together and construed in the light of the purpose and of the object of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2012 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Punjab and ors. . . .

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... repealed act and a device to dissolve the water tight barrier between chapters v & vi of the 1988 act wherein permits are granted to all applicants including the stus under chapter-v, but issued only to the stus pursuant to an approved scheme under chapter-vi; (xii) the scheme suffers from legal mala fides as it perpetuates monopoly of erstwhile stakeholders whose permits under the 1939 act have been rekindled even though they did not survive on account of its repeal in terms of section ..... providing road transport service, where such undertaking is carried on by (i) the central government or a state government ; cwp no.15786 of 1999 transport matter -8- (ii) any road transport corporation established under section 3 of the road transport corporations act, 1950 ; (iii) any municipality or any corporation or company owned or controlled by the central government or one or more state governments, or by the central government and one or more state governments; (iv) zilla parishad or any other similar local authority. ..... the case may be, from a district head quarter or any important town cwp no.15786 of 1999 transport matter - 73 - and the union territory, and on the basis of the need so assessed by the state transport commissioner, from time to time: provided further that the private operators of the heat ventilation and air conditioned buses (hvac) and air-conditioned integral coaches or super integral coaches, as the case may be, may also be allowed to operate on the neighbouring inter- .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 1988 (HC)

Ramesh Birch and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1988P& H281

..... this amendment act 2 of 1985, which was extended to the union territory of chandigarh incorporated section 13-a in the east punjab urban rent restriction act 3 of 1949, which conferred certain special rights in favour of 'specified landlord' which expression means 'a person who is entitled to receive rent in respect of a building on his own account and who is holding or has held an appointment in public service or post in connection with the affairs of the union or of a state' in the matter of recovery of possession of residential or scheduled buildings.2. ..... 'on the various forms of control over the i delegated legislation, they referred to a number of judgments and then ultimately concluded that when the legislature had preserved its capacity and retained its control over the delegate at any time to repeal the legislation and withdraw the authority and discretion it had vested in the delegate, the legislature could not be said to have abdicated its essential functions. ..... municipal corporation of the city of poona air 1959 sc 586 the supreme court upheld the provisions of s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1982 (HC)

Kalwa Vs. Vasakha Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H480

..... apart from the preceding ordinances the punjab tenants and security of tenures act, 1950 and the punjab tenants (security of tenures) (amendment) act, 1951, were hurriedly brought on the statute book and then repealed and substituted by the punjab security of land tenures act, 1953. ..... in view of section 8-a of the pepsu tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1955, and section 17-a of the punjab security of land tenure act, 1953, it is not imaginable that the legislature which had manifested a clear intention of ushering in a socialistic pattern of society by placing the rights of the tenants on a higher pedestal would have debarred the tenants from exercising the right ..... equally what deserves highlighting in this context is that by section 18 of the punjab security of land tenures act, 1953 and the predecessor legislation, a statutory right had been conferred for the first time on tenants of purchase the land under their tenancy on the satisfaction of the conditions prescribed ..... i would, therefore, conclude that the analogy sought to be raised with regard to the observation in vaddeboyina tulasamma's case (air 1977sc 1944) in the context of the peculiar provisions and the scheme of section 14 of the hindu succession act is wholly wide off the mark here and indeed irrelevant to the issue before us.34. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay, air 1974 sc 2009 has observed as follows (at p ..... newport corporation, 1952 ac 189 (house of lords) in the following terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1982 (HC)

Ram Puri, Chandigarh Vs. Chief Commissioner, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H301

..... to revert to the quotations above extracted from jagdish chand radhey shyam's case (air 1972 sc 2587) (supra) it is noticeable from paragraph 16 of the report, as also from section 9 since repealed, that to exercise the power to resume the site or building, the estate officer had to take recourse to the punjab public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act, 1959. ..... (3) the unpaid portion of the consideration money together with interest or any other amount, if any, due to the state government on account of the transfer of any site or building under sub-section (1) shall be a first charge on that site or building, as the case may be; and notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no transferee shall, except with the previous permission in writing of the estate officer be entitled to sell, mortgage or otherwise transfer ( ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay, air 1974 sc 2009, the provisions of section 8-a are not violative of article 14 of the constitution and, therefore, the contention of the counsel for the petitioner is rejected ..... the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1953, seeks to carry out the above objects.'61 ..... lalji raja & sons, air 1953 sc 248, 250:--'according to the dictionary meaning of the word 'forfeiture' the loss or the deprivation of goods has got to be in consequence of a crime, offence or breach of engagement or has to be by way of penalty of the transgression or a punishment for an offence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1968 (HC)

Manmohan Singh Tandon Vs. Manmohan Singh Gujral and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H331

..... . keeping in view the legislative history of the provisions of article 233(1) of the constitution and the history behind the enactment of section 254 of the government of india act, 1935, as well as the observations of their lordships of the supreme court in air 1966 sc 447 (supra) and the scope of difference between certain specified constitutional powers of the governors on the one hand and the executive powers of the state government headed by the governor on the other as brought out in the case of ..... promotion of, district judges in any province shall be made by the governor of the province shall be made by the governor of the province, exercising his individual judgment, and the high court shall be consulted before a recommendations to the making of any such appointment is submitted to the governor'.clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 9 of the indian independence act, 1947, passed by the british parliament provided that the governor general shall by order make such provision as appears to him to be necessary or expedient ..... their lordships observed:-'the article posits the continuation of the pre-existing laws made by a competent authority notwithstanding the repeal of article 395; and the expression ' other' on the article can only apply to provisions other than those dealing with legislative competence. ..... in south india corporation (p) ltd. v. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //