Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... soil. it is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for conversion of use of the said land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes, in accordance with - 153 - the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short the said act of 1964 ). according to the case of the petitioner, a full bench of this court, in the ..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of ..... particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three lists (lists i, ii and iii) where the taxing power of the state legislature has been subjected to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development ?. (emphasis added) 78. in the case of thressiamma .....
Tag this Judgment!