Court : Jammu and Kashmir
Reported in : AIR2000J& K73
ORDERG.D. Sharma, J.1. Through the medium of this revision petition, order dated 8-4-1999 passed by the learned IVth Addl. District Judge, Srinagar (in Civil Misc. appeal title 'Director Food and Supplies Deptt. v. Qazi Nazir Ahmad, against the order dated 9-10-1998 passed by Sub Judge (CJM) Srinagar) is prayed to be set aside. The appeal was dismissed by the learned Judge.2. The factual matrix of the case is that on25-5-1998, petitionerNo. 2 (predecessora) invited the tenders for the supply of empty gunny bags of the year 1998-99. In terms of the notice of tender, only the registered firms/ contractors could take part of in the sale of empty bags which numbered 43,43,001. They were of different categories and lying in various godowns of the Food and Supplies Department. An approved tenders had to lift the bags from respective places. Earnest money of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten lakhs) in the shape of FDR, CDR drawn on any scheduled bank pledged to petitioner No. 2 had to accompany the te...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH201Civil Writ Petition No.2841 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.07.2014 M/s Suave Automotive Corporation .....Petitioner Versus HSIIDC LTD.and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL Present: Dr. Surya Parkash, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms.Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana. **** SURYA KANT, J. C.M.No.7726 of 2014 Documents taken on record. Application disposed of. CWP No.2841 of 2013 (O&M) The petitioner was allotted an industrial plot at Bawal District Rewari in the year 2006. With a view to provide residential accommodation to its workmen, the respondents also allotted Group Housing plots to the petitioner by draw of lots. Plot No.GH-11 was decided to be allotted to the petitioner subject to the terms and Sharma Ritu 2014.07.31 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.2841 of 201...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3362/2014 SHRI NIWAS & ETC Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ram Bir Chauhan, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP with SI Arun Verma, EOW CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. No.11657/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 3362/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No.247/2011 registered at Police Station Economic Offence Wing under Sections 420/423/467/468/471 IPC read with Section 120B IPC primarily on the ground that the parties have since arrived at a settlement in terms of a Memorandum of Understanding executed between the petitioner and the second respondent/complainant on 27.11.2012 which was thereafter followed by a settlement agreement executed before the Delhi High Court Mediation a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~22 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4715/2014 RAJU & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Sumit Kumar. AND + CRL.M.C. 4753/2014 VISHAL RAJ & ORS .... Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjay Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS Through ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Sumit Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.16045/2014 in Crl.M.C. No.4715/2014 Crl.M.A. No.16266/2014 in Crl.M.C. No.4753/2014 Exemptions, as prayed for, are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. These applications are disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.4715/2014 Crl.M.C. No.4753/2014 1. These two petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seek quashing of FIR No.736/2014 registered under Sections 308, 324, 34 IPC; and FIR No.735/2014 under Sections 308, 34 IPC, both registered at Polic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 883/2015 & Crl.M.A. 3308/2015 SUDARSHAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shohit Chaudhary, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Through: .....Respondents Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Om Prakash Mr. Pamod Dubey, Advocate with respondents No.2 and 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.263/2014, under Sections 279/427 of IPC registered at police station Hauz Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 12th February, 2015 (Annexure-3) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Praveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Pramod Dubey, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 to 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentSt...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A.No.287 of 2003 Lallu Mistri & Ors. . Appellants Versus Praduman Mistri & Ors. .... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Appellant : Mr. P.K.Deomani, advocate For the Respondents : None --------- 06/Dated:01. 09.2016 I.A.No. 666/16 with I.A. No. 665/16 Learned counsel for the appellants is in attendance, however on repeated calls none appeared on behalf of the respondents.2. The above interlocutory applications have been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and under Order 22, Rules 3 & 9 of the C.P.C respectively for condoning the delay of 2998 days and for substituting the legal heirs/representatives of deceased appellant no.3, namely Radhe Mistry, who died on 20.08.2007 and for setting aside of the abatement.3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the appellants could not file the appropriate application on time, as they had no knowledge that the conducting lawyer, Mr. D...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1. The instaut writ petition has been filed by Syed Babajan, as a cause in public interest. The petitioner claims to be an inhabitant of Cholamballi Village. Guluru Hobli. Turnkur Taluk and District. It is also the case of the petitioner, that his family owns agricultural land measuring 6 acres 33 guntas in Sy.No. 18 of the same village. According to averments made in the writpetition, the land adjoining to the petitioner's land comprises of a hillock which has a heritage temple. The said adjoining land is also part of Sy.17 of the same village.2. It is averred at the hands of the petitioner, that respondent Nos. 11 to 13 have been carrying quarrying operations in the land adjoining the land of the petitioner's family for the last more than 10 years, and have been causing severe air pollution detrimental to the health of the residents of the area.3. It is also the contention of the petitioner, that the aforestated respondents are using dynamite for carrying on their quarrying activity ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
#F-1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 914/2008 RAHUL ..... Plaintiff Mr. Ravinder Chauhan, Advocate Through versus M/S. ALLIED REALITY PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Atul Bandhu with Mr. Varun Kumar and Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocates for D-2. Date of Decision:30. h April, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for declaration/cancellation of documents and injunction. By the present suit the plaintiff has sought cancellation/annulment of the following documents :i) Unregistered Power of Attorney dated 18th May, 2004 allegedly executed by the plaintiff in favour of his brother, Mr. Dheeraj, defendant no. 4; ii) CS(OS) 914/2008 by defendant no. 4 in favour of defendant no. 3; iii) Unregistered Power of Attorney dated 18th June, 2004 executed by defendant no. 3 in favour of defendant no. 2; and iv) Sale Deed dated 20th September, 2006 executed in favour of defendant no.1.2. Learned counsel ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Civil Writ Petition No.16598 of 2012 :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: December 06, 2012 Dr.Jagtar Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak & another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. PRESENT: Mr.H.S.Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Can M.B.B.S.degree of a doctor be cancelled after long lapse of time on the ground that he had got admission to the couRs.as a reserved category, to which he does not belong. This, significant issue is raised in the present writ petition. The field is not entirely uncovered as there are some precedents which will throw some light on the issue arising in the present petition. The MBBS degree couRs.of the petitioner which he C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Company Law Board CLB
1. The Northern Regional Bench received applications under Section 58A(9) of the Companies Act (hereinafter called "the Act") from certain depositors complaining against non-repayment of fixed deposits by Uniplas India Ltd. (hereinafter called "the company"). The following major deposits have matured but were not repaid :(i) Sh. Anand Kumar 200 lakhs(ii) Air Force Naval Housing Board 75 lakhs(iii) Sh. Mandeep Singh Bains 25 lakhs.2. In addition, from the statement of other small deposits matured, but not repaid, as submitted by the company it is also found that an amount of Rs. 26,43,671 towards 207 depositors has become due. This was the position as of November, 1996, of outstanding deposits as filed by the company as per our directions. However, a perusal of the balance-sheet of the company as on June 30, 1996, filed by the company shows that the total outstanding position of fixed deposits including interest accrued and due thereon amounted to Rs. 3,94,67,858. In addition, the comp...
Tag this Judgment!