Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: advocates faculty of Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 10 results (0.007 seconds)

G.S. Makkad Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT47(CG)

..... 1 and 2 would submit that the vacancy in science faculty was reserved for direct recruitment and there was a clear vacancy in arts faculty in which the petitioner was promoted and appointed as lecturer. ..... per contra, shri ajay dwivedi, learned deputy government advocate for state/respondent nos. ..... the petitioner was thereafter promoted as lecturer in science faculty which fell vacant on account of death of one shri h.l. ..... the reason recorded by the respondents that the petitioner was appointed against vacant post in arts faculty is not correct.6. ..... , on 23-12-1997 (annexure p-15) wrote to the joint director, public instructions that the appointment of the petitioner on the post of lecturer is bad because he was appointed against the vacant post of hindi, political science and history, in science faculty. ..... 23-12-1997 (annexure p-15) and order dated 12-1-1998 (annexure p-16) whereunder, promotion of the petitioner to the post of lecturer has been cancelled on the ground that the promotion has been made, without there being vacancy in science faculty.2. .....

Smt Rakhi Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... , an order has already been passed allowing two advocates of her choice to assist the prosecution and thus even the apprehension do not survive for consideration. ..... (3) learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the respondent no.2/husband is a practicing advocate and one of the accused namely smt. ..... to assist the prosecution and two advocates of her choice have been permitted to appear in course of trial and assist the prosecution. ..... nagendra sharma is a practicing advocate at durg and mrs. ..... shilpa sharma is a professor in law faculty at chhattisgarh college. .....

Gaukaran Singh and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT47(CG)

..... bajaj, learned government advocate for the state opposing the petitions advanced similar arguments as advanced on behalf of the respondent-company.13. ..... mishra, learned advocate general with mr. ..... bhaskar pyasi, advocates for the respondent-lafarge india pvt. ..... ravishankar prasad, senior advocate with mrs. ..... meena shastri, advocate for the petitioners in w.p. (c) no. ..... pankaj agarwal, advocate for the petitioner in w.p. (c) no. ..... . learned advocate general for the state contended that the state government has issued notification dated 3-9-2003 (annexure r-1) in the exercise of powers conferred by clauses (2) and (3) of article 166 of the constitution of india and authorized the collectors of ..... agarwal, advocate for the petitioners in w.p. ..... advocate with mr. .....

Balvinder Singh Rajput Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2006Chh65

..... 1 to exercise the discretion of issuing notification only way or another to bring into force section 30 of the advocates act, 1961 having regard to the fact that almost half century has elapsed from the date on which the act received the assent of the hon'ble president of india.c ..... thus, it is quite clear that subject to the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 1 of the advocates act, it is the power of the central government to bring into force various provisions of the act by issuing notification envisaged under sub-section (3) in the official ..... at the threshold, it needs to be noticed that sub-section (3) section 1 of the advocates act, 1961 provides that the act shall, in relation to the territories other than those referred to in sub-section (4) come into force on such date as the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, appoint ..... of india : 1988crilj1809 would contend that notwithstanding the gap of 49 years, the government of india has not brought the section 30 of the advocates act, 1961 into force and there was absolutely no justification for the government of india not to bring section 30 of the advocates act and consequently the litigant public as well as the community of the advocates suffer a lot. ..... , in the case of aelterncsh rein : 1988crilj1809 (supra), a request similar to the one made in this writ petition was made before the apex court to issue a direction to the central government to bring section 30 of the advocates act into force. .....

Reshamlal Pradhan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary and Ano ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... been pleaded that on enquiry being made by respondent no.1, the chairman of all india council for technical education (aicte) on 21-8-2015 has clearly informed that the degree in the discipline in which the candidate is applying for a faculty position is required, as such, the petitioner does not have the post-graduate degree in information technology, as he is only having post-graduate degree in computer science and, therefore, he was not eligible to be considered against the ..... computer science is eligible for the post of assistant professor (information technology) in engineering college which has been replied by the aicte that degree in discipline in which he is applying for a faculty position is required, meaning thereby that the aicte is clearly of the opinion that a candidate must have the b.e. ..... prafull bharat, learned additional advocate general appearing for the state of chhattisgarh/respondent no.1, while vehemently opposing and countering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner is out-and-out ineligible to be ..... the aicte regulations provide for faculty norms the relevant portion of which reads as under:- programmecadrequalificationsexperienceengineering /technologyasstt.professorbe/btech and me/ mtech in relevant branch with first class or equivalent either in be/btechor me/mtech ..... of the chairman, aicte is as follows: - the degree in the discipline in which he is applying for a faculty position is required. eg. .....

Anil Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... ms farah minhaz advocate for the petitioner ^ shri v v s murthy dy advocate general for the state respondent no 1 shri s s rajput and shri anant bajpai advocate for the coram: honble shri satish k agnihotri j dated:19. ..... pursuant to the complaint dated 09.11.2011, a meeting was called on 14.11.2011 vide the notice dated 12.11.2011 (annexure r-2/2) collectively, wherein the other faculty members namely dr. ..... lata uppadhyay is correct, it is the act of gross indiscipline and student wants to extract marks by threatening the faculty.4. ..... it was his second act of misbehavior with the faculty. .....

Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur and Another Vs. Pragya Pawar and Ot ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... separate lists as detailed below- list:- a of those candidates who have attended at least 75% both of the lectures delivered and of the practicals held separately in each subject of the courses of instructions for the examination (in the case of faculties of medicine and ayurveda, the minimum attendance in theory shall be 75 per cent. ..... goel, additional director, department of high education and shri sunil otwani, advocate, to enquire into the allegations and counter allegations. ..... separately and in the case of faculty of engineering the minimum shall be 85 per cent. ..... advocate general appearing for the state, would submit that the enquiry committee was constituted and the additional director, department of higher education was directed to hold an enquiry into the issue of short attendance of the ..... goel, additional director, department of higher education and shri sunil otwani, advocate. .....

Tata Motors Finance Limited Vs. Rashmi Bagga

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... document annexure r-1 is statement of accounts, document annexure r-2 is letter dated 10.10.2008 sent by law nexus and associates, advocates, consultants and legal advisors to the respondent (complainant), document annexure r-3 is letter dated 10.09.2008 sent by law nexus and associates, advocates, consultants and legal advisors to the respondent (complainant), document annexure r-4 are postal receipts, document annexure r-5 and r-6 are pre-repossession intimation to the police station dated 14.12.2009, document annexure r-7 is repossessed vehicle inventory list ..... ) to pay a sum of rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and unfair trade practice and rs.2,000/- as advocate fees and cost of litigation. 2. ..... sinha, advocate to the appellant (o.p. .....

Dr. AtIn Kundu and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2003Chh1; 2003(1)MPHT67(CG)

..... bhatia, shri prashant jaiswal and shri rajeev shrivas-tava, advocates who had entered appearance on their behalf and were also heard. 13. ..... it was also pointed out by the learned advocate general that there are 579 hospitals in rural areas out of which 91 hospitals are without doctors since inception. ..... opposing the prayer, the learned advocate general submitted that the state was justified in incorporating rule 6.3, as an eligibility criteria. ..... in reply, it was contended by the learned advocate general that the interpretation of rule 6.3 as put by the petitioners, was not correct. .....

Madan Singh and ors. Vs. Sudhir Kumar Agrawal

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT28(CG)

..... finding has been recorded in paragraph 26 of the judgment of the trial court, in which it is held that the respondent is an advocate and somehow he is carrying on his profession of advocacy in the drawing room, which is causing great inconvenience to the family. ..... it was submitted that the respondent and his wife both are advocates an they do not have any other non-residential accommodation of their own in the city. ..... . the facts, which have been proved beyond reasonable doubt and not disputed are that the plaintiff respondent sudhir kumar agrawal is an advocate and is practicing since 1981 ..... . his wife is also an advocate and exhibit p-26 is a registration certificate issued by the slate bar council of madhya pradesh ..... . the plaintiff is a registered advocate ..... . his wife is also an advocate .....