Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: accident Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai goa Page 58 of about 572 results (0.008 seconds)

May 08 2012 (HC)

Miss Kumud Pagi Vs. Gurudas Shet Gaonkar and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... ) 1.this appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 30.6.2007 passed by the learned presiding officer of the motor accident claims tribunal, south goa, margao (tribunal, for short), in claim petition no. ..... according to the learned counsel, therefore, since the accident had occurred in the year 2003, the actual loss of income should have been calculated for three years. ..... act, for short) thereby claiming total compensation of rs.12.00,000/- on account of injuries sustained by her in a motor vehicular accident, which injuries resulted into permanent disability. 3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2012 (HC)

Madan Malji Kambli and Others Vs. State of Goa, Through Its Chief Secr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

s.c. dharmadhikari, j. 1. rule. the respondents waive service. since all the affidavits are filed, pleadings are complete, with the consent of the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2} this writ petition together with other petitions involve identical questions of fact and law, they were heard together and are, therefore, disposed off by this common judgment. 3} the state of goa has initiated proceedings for acquisition of the lands of the petitioners for the construction of the new international airport at mopa in pernem taluka. 4} the notification and declaration in that behalf was issued on 25th july 2008 and 28th july 2009, respectively, under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short the l.a act) and under section 6 of the l.a act. both are impugned on various grounds to which we will advert a little later. 5} the petitioners claim to be owners/tenants of the properties indicated against their names/ the names of their ancestors in this notification. they are thus persons interested in these lands. 6} it is the case of the petitioners that the respondent nos.1 and 2, namely, the state of goa and the special land acquisition officer, mopa air port cell, in panjim, goa had issued these notifications for the public purpose, namely, for construction of new international airport in pernem taluka in the state of goa. at the same time, the state government declared that in its opinion, sub-section 1 of section 17 of the l.a act is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //