Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1971Raj211; 1970(3)WLN626
..... 24, 25 and 26.provided that, if owing to urgent necessity or unavoidable accident all such persons do not so appear, the registrar, in cases where the delay in appearing does not exceed four months, may direct that on payment of a fine not exceeding ten times the amount of the proper ..... . section 25 provides for a further period of 4 months in cases of urgent necessity or unavoidable accident on payment of fine .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1971WLN74
..... the vehicle met with an accident in the month of march, 1967, on amber road. ..... after the accident the car was driven by saroopa for a couple of days and it was realised that no profit accrued in the business of illicit liquor. ..... a month after the purchase of the car it met with an accident at amber. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1972Raj161; 1971(4)WLN137
..... in general accident fire and life assurance corporation ltd. v. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1971WLN226
..... however, on general principles and on considerations of the safety of the consumers of electricity, the duty of the supplier to arrange for periodical inspentionsand to notice any changes in the electric supply lines brought about by accident or otherwise, bringing clearance within the limits provided by rule 79 and to arrange for restoration in a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner, must not be excluded. ..... defendants were careless and negligent in carrying out their duties and responsibilities in respect of installing the line, supplying electric power and carrying out the various obligations imposed by law, resulting in irregular supply of current, accidents, stoppage of power and giving rise to many complaints from the government and the public'. ..... was itself a sufficient warning to keep away at safe distance;(c) the deceased surajmal acted negligently in handling the overhead wires without first ascertainting that power current did not pass at that time the fatal accident occurred due to causes wholly and exclusively contributed by the deceased surajmal.4. ..... the suit has been brought under the provisions of the fatal accident act in consequence of the death of surajmal husband of the plaintiff-appellant smt. ..... 3 is decided in favour of the plaintiffs, whether the above acts of defendants result in irregular supply of current, accident, stoppage of power and if so, what is its effect on the suit? ..... (29) whether the suit is not maintainable under the fatal accident act? .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1971WLN155
..... . 214 the plaintiff was the legal practitioner & he has sustained the fracture of his clevical & first lumber vertebra in a motor accident due to which he had to remain in bed for three months & was disabled from following his profession for six months ..... . having regard to the nature of the shock, the pain and suffering felt by the plaintiff at the time of the accident and thereafter and the impairment of the normal enjoyment of life and the loss of full expectation of life, i consider that she is entitled to rs ..... . 369 the left leg below the knee had to be amputated because of the injuries received by the plaintiff during the accident and he was also awarded rs ..... . 224 due to the accident, the plaintiffs left leg was cut and due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver, he sustained various other injuries, his leg had to be amputated and he hovered between life and death in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1971WLN235
..... 636 'the driver was not to make experiments; he should leave ample room, and if an accident happened, from want of that sufficient room, he was no doubt liable. ..... vehicle in front at a time or under conditions which render such a course not reasonably prudent and if in doing this he collides, it is scarcely conceivable that he could escape being held negligent (vide section 65 of the trial of motor car accident cases (supra). ..... where there is ample room for the vehicle to pass the pedestrian in safety; the latter is entitled to assume that the motorist will do so : see section 156 of the trial of motor car accident cases (supra).8. ..... mean that he is of necessity not negligent, for the law does not allow a person on his proper side of the road to run down everything in his path with impunity; vide section 35 of the trial of motor car accident cases by a.d. ..... he gives graphic detail as to the manner in which the accident happened. ..... the accident took place at a lonely place, where no other person excepting the injured and the accused were available. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1972Raj120; 1971(4)WLN263
..... in other words, if the defendant could not have filed an action for the enforcement of the particular right against the plaintiff in an action of his own, the accident of the plaintiff filing some suit against the defendant cannot enable the latter to agitate his right in the form of a counter claim. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1972Raj250; 1971(4)WLN334
..... conveyance, or will a beneficial right is to arise upon the performance by the beneficiary of some act in a stated manner, or at a stated time, the act must be performed accordingly in order to obtain the enjoyment of the right, and in the absence of fraud, accident or surprise, equity will not relieve against a breach ol the terms.' 16 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1972Raj271; 1972()WLN212
..... against the award given by motor accident claims tribunal, jodhpur (district judge, jodhpur) dated 14-4-67 under which the appellant and safikhan and safi-mohammad khan, driver and owner of the truck no. ..... to respondent mangilal on account of injury caused to mangilal by an accident on account of negligent driving of the truck. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1972)IILLJ598Raj
..... the employer shall not be so liable-(a) in respect of any injury which does not result in the total or partial disablement of the workman for a period exceeding three days:(b) in respect of any injury, not resulting in death, caused by an accident which is directly attributable to-(i) the workman having been at the time thereof under the influence of drink or drugs, or(ii) the wilful disobedience of the workman to an order expressly given, or to a rule expressly framed, for the purpose of securing ..... . he was held not entitled to compensation because according to that authority although the heat exhaustion which led ultimately to the death of the workman was an injury by accident which occurred in the course of employment, it did not arise out of the employment.15 ..... . it was in these circumstances that this court held that the accident arose out of the deceased's employment and the act of lighting the match stick, even if it be held as a rash or negligent act, would not debar his widow from claiming compensation.14 ..... the law on the point no doubt is that not only the accident causing injury or death should take place in the course of the employment of the workman, but it must also arise out of the employment. ..... (4) save as provided by sub-sections (2), (2-a) and (3), no compensation shall be payable to a workman in respect of any disease unless the disease is directly attributable to a specific injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. .....
Tag this Judgment!