Court : Patna
..... learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in this case the motor vehicle act of 1939 is applicable as the accident had occurred on 19.9.1984 before coming into force of the motor vehicle act of 1988, and section 95(2)(b)(ii) of the act of 1939 would show that in respect of any one accident, the liability of an insurer in respect of passengers is limited to only rs. ..... district judge cum motor accidents claims tribunal, muzaffarpur, under which he has held the owner (respondent no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... section 92-a (1) of the act contemplates that where death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of motor vehicle or motor vehicles, the owner of the vehicle shall, or as the case may be, the owners of the vehicles shall jointly and severally be liable to pay the compensation in respect of such ..... from a bare reading of the aforesaid provision, it is amply clear that on the death or permanent disablement of a person due to an accident arising out of a vehicle, the owner or owners of such vehicle or vehicles will be liable. ..... district judge-cum-accidents claims tribunal, chaibasa, in misc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... the owners of the vehicle filed joint written statement stating that at the time of accident, the vehicle was duly insured under comprehensive policy no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... the accident took place on 22.7.1996. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... admittedly, the impugned order itself shows that the husband and six months old daughter of the claimant died in a railway accident on the relevant date and time when the deceased were travelling in a railway train. ..... the railway accidents (compensation) rules, 1990, rule 3 read with schedule, part i, indicates that amount of compensation to be awarded to any claimant for the death of any passenger, i.e., rs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... the only point raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the death of the deceased had not taken place due to any motor accident rather they were killed by miscreants and after killing they filed away with the vehicles and therefore, the claim petition before the motor vehicles tribunal was not maintainable. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... 28/5 of 1995/1998 by the 3rd additional district judge-cum-motor accident claims tribunal, aurangabad (bihar) whereby and whereunder the learned tribunal has held the appellant-company liable for payment of ad interim compensation to the claimant and directed to pay rs. ..... 50,000/-as ad interim compensation for the death of raju kumar agrawal, who met with an accident from a truck bearing no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... the appellant has disputed the factum of accident. 4. ..... he died on november 8, 1988 due to accident. 2. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... this court fails to appreciate as to how the said decisions are of any help-to the appellant in the facts and circumstances of the present case where the deceased died in the accident on the spot on 22-5-1998 and the widow has been kept deprived of the claim for now over three and a half years.10. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... so, the position of the car at the accident side may not necessarily indicate that the car was being driven on its wrong side. .....
Tag this Judgment!