Court : Guwahati
..... what, rather, the defence suggested to this witness was that she had given a blow on the accused, when the accused was scuffling with her husband, but accidently or by mistake, the blow fell on her husband. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... therefore, i am of the considered view that, had the local durbar, shillong municipal authority and the contractors taken steps and remained vigilant keeping in mind the public safety in general such incident or accident could have been aborted.5. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... it was not suggested to the doctor in his cross-examination that it was not a case of homicide and that the injuries were caused by accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... tr-01-a-0755, which got damaged due to an accident and the said car was given to the petitioners' firm for replacement of damaged door by a new one. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... deputy commissioner (judicial) and motor accident claims tribunal.5. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... brought to the notice of the concerned police station, the accused persons in the evening of the same day further threatened to evict the informant before 12 noon of the next day from churaibari and the fire accident took place in the early morning at about 3/3.30 of 3-2-2004, lead nearly to the conclusion that there cannot be any other hypothesis except to the guilt of the accused persons for the said fire incident though there .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
aftab hussain saikia, j.1. heard mr. t.j. mahanta and ms. p. bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the appellant as well as mr. s.c. biswas and mr. p.j. nath, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. this matrimonial appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 14.12.2004 passed by learned principal judge, family court, kamrup, guwahati in f.c. (civil) no. 147/2003, where by the prayer of the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce against his wife, the respondent herein by filing a petition under sections 13(1) (ia) and (ib) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (in short, 'the act') was rejected holding that both the grounds of 'desertion' and 'cruelty' so set out by the appellant for divorce against his wife, the respondent could not be proved by the petitioner/appellant herein.3. impugning the judgment & order and also in support of the appeal, mr. mahanta, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the learned judge misread and misconstrued the entire material evidence on record so adduced by the petitioner/appellant. in support of his case for divorce on the ground of 'dissertion and cruelty' against the wife, it is further contended that the learned judge ought not to have given weightage to the evidence adduced by the respondent. according to him, the respondent/wife of the petitioner/appellant admittedly left the house on 10.4.2000 after staying hardly for 4 months as their marriage was solemnized on 10.12.1999 and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... ) on their defence.i think the contention of the complainant that the date written by the learned magistrate at the bottom has been incorrectly shown by sheer accident as 21-11-53 instead of 21-9-53 (is correct?). .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
srivastava, j. 1. this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, stated to be in public interest, seeks, seizure of all books of accounts of the assam state branch of red cross society, direction to respondents no. 3 and 4 to open up for new membership, direction to respondent no. 4 to call annual general meeting forthwith and to appoint committee to enquire into all acts of the red cross society for last seven years and thereafter take appropriate action. the respondent no. 3 is the indian red cross society assam state branch hereinafter referred as the 'society', and the respondent no. 4 is its honorary secretary. 2. the petitioner obtained m.b.b.s. degree in the year 1975 and started private practice at guwahati. the petitioner attended m/s. borthakur nursing home and in the year 1982 went to america for about a year. on return the petitioner again started private practice at guwahati and was attached with m/s. east end nursing home. she later joined he christian medical college hospital, vellore and remained there up to 1987. in the first part of 1988, the petitioner was appointed in the red cross hospital at chandmari. the petitioner resigned the post on 12-5-1989. this petition was filed on 23-5-1989. 3. shri v.k. dewan, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this petition has been filed in public interest for the reasons mainly that no annual general meeting of the respondent no. 3 has been held for the last ten years, that the resources .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
saikia, j.1. the writ petitioner herein impugns the order d/- 15-12-81 (annexure f) issued by the deputy registrar (examination), gauhati university, informing the petitioner that his b.a. (two year) examination of 1980 has been cancelled and he has been further debarred from appearing at any university examination for two subsequent years for his assaulting invigilator in the said examination.2. the facts are short. the petitioner appeared in the b.a. part-ii 1980 examination which ended on 5-5-81 from the cotton college, gauhati, under roll no. 14127. on 6-5-81 his father received a letter dated 6-5-81 (annexure a) from the principal, cotton college. it stated that there was some anomaly relating to the petitioner's examination, and, therefore, the father was urgently requested, to come to the principal's office with his son, the petitioner, by 7th may, 1981. when the petitioner with his father met the principal, on being asked the petitioner denied that there was any assault of any invigilator by him. while the matter was expected to have ended there, the petitioner received a letter d/- 17-9-81 (annexure b) informing him that his result was withheld on a confidential report that he assaulted invigilator, sri s. choudhury (later on corrected as s. k. chakravorty) while the latter was returning home after completing his invigilation duty on 5-5-81. the petitioner was asked to show cause on or before 26-9-81 why he would not be liable for appropriate action for the above .....
Tag this Judgment!