Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: a shared household Page 3 of about 8,988 results (0.026 seconds)

Aug 20 2008 (HC)

Vishal Damodar Patil Vs. Vishakha Vishal Patil

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009CriLJ107

..... under the said section the learned magistrate can direct the respondent to secure the same level of alternate accommodation for aggrieved person as enjoyed by her in the shared household. ..... under the said section the learned magistrate can restrain the respondent in the application under section 12 from dispossessing or in any other manner disturbing the possession of the aggrieved person from the shared household. ..... section 17 is regarding a right of a woman to reside in the shared household. ..... he submitted that the direction issued by the learned trial judge by order dated 4th january, 2008 by which the first respondent was permitted to reside in the shared house is in the nature of the final order which could not have been passed without giving an opportunity to the petitioner of adducing evidence. ..... therefore, an order as regards a shared accommodation was passed. ..... under the said section the learned magistrate can issue direction against the respondent to remove himself from the household. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2008 (HC)

T. Saritha Reddy and anr. Vs. T. Obireddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT481

..... if the interpretation canvassed by the learned counsel for the respondent is accepted, all these houses of the husband's relatives will be shares households and the wife can well insist in living in the all these houses of her husband's relatives merely because she had stayed wither husband for some time in those houses in the past. ..... may be available under any law can only be as against the husband and not against the father-in-law or mother-in-law.learned counsel for the respondent smt.taruna batra stated that the definition of shared household includes a house-hold where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage had lived in a domestic relationship. ..... he contended that since admittedly the respondent had lived in the property in question in the past, hence the said property is her shared household.if the aforesaid submissions is accepted, then it will mean that wherever the husband and wife lived together in the past that property becomes a shared household. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2011 (HC)

Mohanakumar Vs. Santhamma and Another

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2011(3)KLJ780; 2011(4)KLT259; 2011(4)KHC769; 2012(1)KLT37SN

..... the magistrate passed two more orders of prohibition: (i) injuncting the husband from dispossessing the wife/applicant and her children of their shared household and, (ii) in any manner of causing obstruction to her in taking yield from 1.5 acres property owned and possessed by her, at arayanjilimannu. ..... the definition of shared household as covered by section 2(s) of the act clearly spells out that it means a household where a person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship with the respondent. ..... while they were having a shared household she was manhandled and necked out with her children and thereafter, she is living separately with the children in a rented house and, still, there is interference and perpetration of violence against her; even of preventing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2012 (HC)

V.Krishnaveni Vs. V.Rajkumar

Court : Chennai

..... no.1 from alienating the property bearing door no.6 nagalingam pillai street, thiruchuli road, arupukkottai, virudhunagar district, which the petitioner claims to be a shared household;(ii)restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from dispossessing or in any other manner disturbing the possession of the petitioner of the above said shared household at bearing door no.6, nagalingam pillai street, thiruchuli road, aruppukkottai, virudhunagar district after she would begin her stay in the said ..... shared house and for giving protection to her through police; and(iii)for an interim direction, directing the first respondent to permit the revision ..... 2010, dated 15.06.2010, confirmed by the learned additional sessions judge, (fast track court no.1), madurai in c.a.no.57 of 2010 dated 07.03.2011 and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to reside in the shared household situated at no.6, nagalingampillai street, thiruchuli road, aruppukkottai, virudhunagar district.order1. ..... a sum of rs.17,25,000/- from the first respondent for not claiming any right in the property mentioned above and that the said property had been never a house shared by the petitioner and the first respondent. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2011 (HC)

V.K.V. Sarma Vs. Ms. Indra Sarma

Court : Karnataka

..... section 2 (f) of the defines domestic relationship as to mean the following; 2 (f) domestic relationship means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family. 12. ..... it is therefore clear form the aforesaid expression that, domestic relationship means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family. 13. ..... in our opinion a relationship in the nature of marriage under the 2005 act must also fulfill the above requirements, and in addition the parties must have lived together in a shared household as defined in section 2 (s) of the act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2016 (HC)

Sarika Mahendra Sureka Vs. Mahendra and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... from each and every perspective, in the facts of the present case, the conclusion is inevitable that, at this prima facie stage when the appellant, is undisputably in settled possession of the suit premises, which are her shared household, for a period of more than 25 years, to dispossess her or to oust her from the suit premises, that too by way of interim mandatory injunction, thereby decreeing the suit in its entirety at this interim stage ..... while rejecting such submission, it was held that if the aforesaid submission is accepted, it will mean that wherever husband and wife may have lived together in the past, that property can become shared household and wife may insist in living in all those houses of her husband's relatives merely because she has stayed with her husband for some time in those houses in the past and such a ..... choudhary (177 (2011) dlt 124)and was pleased to observe as follows : it is thus apparent that parliamentary intention was to secure the rights of aggrieved persons in the shared household, which could be tenanted by the respondent (including relative of the husband) or in respect of which the respondent had jointly or singly any right, title, interest or equity ..... act, the hon'ble supreme court was pleased to opine that the wife is only entitled to claim a right of residence in a shared household and shared household would only mean the house belonging to or taken on rent by the husband or house which belongs to the joint family, of which the husband is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2020 (SC)

Satish Chander Ahuja Vs. Sneha Ahuja

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... taruna batra, (2007) 3 scc169 where two-judge bench of this court held that the wife is entitled only to claim a right under section 17(1) to residence in a shared household and a shared household would only mean the house belonging to or taken on rent by the husband, 17 or the house which belongs to the joint family of which the husband is a member.20. ..... has not claimed any relief against his son, raveen ahuja, the husband of the respondent, hence, he was not a necessary party but in view of the fact that respondent has pleaded her right of residence in shared household relying on sections 17 and 19 of the act, 2005 and one of the rights which can be granted under section 19 is right of alternate accommodation, the husband is a proper party. ..... domestic relationship has been defined in section 2(f) in following words:- (f) "domestic relationship" means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family;42. ..... that the suit filed by the plaintiff is directly in conflict with the right of the defendant to reside in her matrimonial residence/shared household granted to her by the legislature and specifically envisaged in section 17 and 19 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 and as such is liable to be dismissed at the threshold. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2022 (SC)

Prabha Tyagi Vs. Kamlesh Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... relationship means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family; x x x (s) shared household means a household where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship either singly or along with the respondent ..... is fostered by family members living together as a joint family as interpreted above and lives or at any point of time has lived together in a shared household or has the right to reside in the shared household being a member living together as a joint family and has been ousted in any way or has been a victim of domestic violence has remedies under ..... however, those illustrations are not exhaustive and there could be several situations and circumstances and every woman in a domestic relationship can enforce her right to reside in a shared household irrespective of whether she has any right, title or beneficial interest in the same and the said right could be enforced by any woman under the said provision ..... domestic relationship is an expansive one and means the relationship between two persons who live or have at any point of time lived together in a shared household when they are related by (i) consanguinity; (ii) marriage; (iii) through a relationship in the nature of marriage; (iv) adoption; (v) are family .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

Smt. Preeti Satija Vs. Smt. Raj Kumari and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... 2(f) domestic relationship" means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the rfa (os) 24/2012 page 8 nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family; section 2(s) defines shared household as follows: 2(s) " shared household" means a household where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship either singly or along with the respondent ..... and includes such a household whether owned or tenanted either jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent, or owned or tenanted by either of them in respect of which either the ..... may belong to the joint family of which the respondent is a member, irrespective of whether the respondent or the aggrieved person has any right, title or interest in the shared household section 2 (q) defines who is a respondent: 2(q) "respondent" means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2019 (HC)

Smt. N. S. Leelavathi Vs. Smt. Dr. R. Shilpa Brunda

Court : Karnataka

..... possession of the aggrieved person from the shared household, whether or not the respondent has a legal or equitable interest in the shared household; (b) directing the respondent to remove himself from the shared household; (c) restraining the respondent or any of his relatives from entering any portion of the shared household in which the aggrieved person resides; (d) restraining the respondent from alienating or disposing off the shared household or encumbering the same; (e) restraining the ..... respondent from renouncing his rights in the shared household except with the leave of the magistrate; or ..... (f) directing the respondent to secure same level of alternate accommodation for the aggrieved person as enjoyed by her in the shared household or to pay rent for the same, if the circumstances so require: provided .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //