2006 4 Scc68327 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2006 4 scc68327 Court: mumbai Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.126 seconds)Vinod Krushnaraoji Wankhede and anr. Vs. Collector
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)BomCR631
2006 and result was to be declared on 17 7 2006 it is clear that the result has not been declared is being taken up for final hearing civil application no 4777 of 2006 becomes infructuous he further states that the documents
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThomas A. Fernandes Vs. Director and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-26-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALLMR447; 2006(6)BomCR551
as contemplated by the amended proviso to the rules of 2006 and therefore the petitioner is entitled to continue in service service till the petitioner attains the age of 60 years 4 the petitioner was appointed as a laboratory assistant initially in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManjit Singh Sethi Vs. Maharashtra Assembly and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-22-2006
Reported in: [2007(4)JCR388(NULL)]
after an enquiry by an order dated 11th 12th april 2006 the petitioner had filed an earlier writ petition against this that the conviction and sentence of the petitioner until 21 4 2006 when the session of the house was prorogued was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProf. Manohar Dhonde and Indian Bahujan Teachers Association (ibta), M ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-26-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)ALLMR717; 2007(1)BomCR417
the petitions were fixed for final hearing on 14 3 2006 at 2 30 p m in fact they were heard j dated 29 4 2005 and also letter dated 30 4 2005 from aurangabad district junior college teachers association by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTejas Dattaguru Pendurkar Vs. Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-03-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)ALLMR476; 2006(3)BomCR45
4484 of 2005 delivered on 21 7 2005 reported in 2006 2 bomcr721 a b in that case the division bench in akshay v state of maharashtra in writ petition no 4484 of 2005 delivered on 21 7 2005 reported in 2006
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSomnath Nanda Naik Palang Vs. Radhabai Purshottam Naik Palang and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-25-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)BomCR672
in this dispute is being adjudicated in appeal no 247 2006 pending before the district court it is also found that inventory court for adjudication according to law pertaining to exhibits 44 49 and 56 article 14 r m lodha s a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Associated Cables P. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-07-2006
Reported in: (2006)206CTR(Bom)580; [2006]286ITR596(Bom)
case of cit v ignifluid boilers i ltd reported in 2006 283 itr 295 in that judgment also a division bench associated cables p ltd v deputy cit 1994 206 itr 48 mr sathe appearing for the respondent has however drawn our
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJai Mahendra Thakor and ors. Vs. Aarti Dinesh JaIn and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-13-2006
Reported in: II(2006)DMC731
the respondent wife has filed an affidavit dated 9 6 2006 stating that she has ended all her disputes with the by her husband or by relatives of her husband section 498a was added with a view to punishing a husband and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Assistant Directo ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-09-2006
Reported in: (2006)206CTR(Bom)409; [2006]287ITR5(Bom)
the petition came up before this court on september 19 2006 when the respondents sought time therefore the matter was adjourned of tax to the tune of rs 225 26 91 435 for the assessment year 2003 04 the petitioner has filed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash B. Borkar Vs. Sukhalal Kumar and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-23-2006
Reported in: 2008(1)KLJ9
complainant approached this court with criminal miscellaneous application no 332 2006 with a prayer for a direction to the accused to bihar and ors has submitted that the powers under section 482 of the code could be utilized as stated by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT