Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against order dated 13.12.2002, passed by District Forum-III, Janak Puri, New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 441/2002entitled Dr. Vijendra Singh v. M/s. Gemsons International and Anr. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the appellant Dr. Vijendra Singh had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum averring therein that the appellant has purchased two Air-conditioners from respondent No. 1 on 10.5.2001 with a warranty of 12 months in respect of all the parts and for 60 months in respect of the compressors in the Air-conditioners. 3. It was stated in the complaint, filed by the appellant, that the two air-conditioners, purchased by him, were installed on 11.5.2001 for which the appellant had paid another sum of Rs. 1,000/- to the respo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The above mentioned appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 25.2.2003, passed by District Forum (Central), Maharana Pratap Bus Terminal, Kashmere Gate, Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 307/2001 entitled Shri Rajpal Singh v. M/s. P.R.J. Enterprises and Ors. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the respondent Shri Rajpal Singh had filed a complaint before the District Forum under Section 12 of the Act averring therein that he had purchased one CNG Auto, bearing Registration No. 6394, make Bajaj Auto-Model-2000 on 30.10.2000 from the appellant. It was stated in the complaint, filed by the respondent, that the respondent on 14.2.2001 had approached the workshop of the appellant for service purposes and when on 15.2.2001 he went to collect the said vehicle after service from the workshop of the appe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The above mentioned appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 13.1.2003, passed by District Forum-II, Udyog Sadan, Institutional Area, Mehrauli, New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 3381/2000 - entitled Shri Deepak Sherawat v. National Insurance Company Ltd. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the respondent Shri Deepak Sherawat had filed a complaint before the District Forum under Section 12 of the Act averring therein that the respondent had an Insurance Policy in respect of his Motorcycle, bearing Registration No. DL-9S-D 5632, Model-1997 with New India Assurance Company Ltd., w.e.f. 11.10.1998 to 10.10.1999. It was stated that after a gap of one month from the date of expiry of the said policy the respondent had approached the appellant for an insurance cover in respect of the above said vehi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 8.10.2001, passed by District Forum-III, Janakpuri, New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 1619/2000 Entitled Sh. Ashwani Kumar v. The Chairman, Delhi Vidyut Board and Anr. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the appellant Shri Ashwani Kumar had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act averring therein that the appellant was residing at A-61, Vishnu Garden, Khyala Road, New Delhi for the last about 32 years and was a consumer in respect of electricity connection bearing K. No. 376988/DL, installed in the above said premises. In the complaint filed by the appellant before the District Forum the grievance of the appellant, in nutshell, was about the non-rectification of the electricity bill, issued by the respondent in respect of the above s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 20.12.2002, passed by District Forum-II, Udyog Sadan, Institutional Area, Mehrauli, New Delhi in two Complaint Cases bearing Nos. 1863/1997 and 2112/1997, both entitled - Shri Rajinder Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the above mentioned appeal, lie in a narrow compass. The appellant Shri Rajinder Kumar, an allottee of Flat No. K-29A, Saket, New Delhi, had filed two complaints (Complaint Case No. 1863/1997 for allotment of scooter garage and Case No. 2112/1997 for allotment of a servant quarter and a car garage) under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum. 3. The learned District Forum vide impugned order has held that there is no force in Complaint No. 2112/1997, filed by the appellant, for allotment of a servant quarter and a car ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 4.1.2003, passed by District Forum (Central), Maharana Pratap Bus Terminal, Kashmere Gate, Delhi in Complaint Case No. 192/2002 entitled - Jatinder Kumar v. The President, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), New Delhi. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the above mentioned appeal briefly stated, are that the appellant Shri Jatinder Kumar had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum averring therein that the appellant had appeared in an examination which was held in November, 1999 and was conducted by the respondent. It was stated that as per marks sheet made available to him in respect of the above said examination, he was declared to have failed in that examination as in paper-I (Group-I), the awarded marks were shown as 33 though the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 16.11.2002, passed by District Forum-II, Udyog Sadan, Institutional Area, Mehrauli, New Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 2195/2000 entitled Shri N.K. Sharma v. The Manager, Bank of Maharashtra, Alaknanda, New Delhi and Anr. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the appellant, Shri N.K. Sharma, had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum averring therein that the appellant had a Savings Bank Account with respondent No. 1 and on 2.1.2000 in the above said account of the appellant there was a balance of Rs. 71,662.42. It was stated that on 5.1.2000, the appellant had deposited a cheque for Rs. 2,09,500/-, drawn on another Bank, in his above mentioned Savings Bank Account. It was stated that on that very date, the ap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellants, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 24.10.2002, passed by District Forum (New Delhi), in Complaint Case No. OC/309/2000 entitled Shri Arjan Dass and Ors. v. Royal Nepal Airlines, 44 Janpath, New Delhi. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal lie in a narrow compass. The appellants had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum averring therein that the appellants had travelled from Delhi Airport to Kathmandu (Nepal) on 2.5.1992 by Flight No. RA-218, operated by the respondent. It was stated that at the time of boarding the flight at Delhi, the appellants had handed over their baggage, consisting of 5 suitcases to the functionaries of the respondent for being transported from Delhi to Nepal. It was stated that, on their arrival at Kathmandu Airport, all the 5 suitcases, were f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 1.2.2003, passed by District Forum (Central), Maharana Pratap Bus Terminal, Kashmere Gate, Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 273/2002 entitled Shri Harsimron Singh Sandhu and Anr. v. M/s. Delhi and District Cricket Association, Ferozshah Kotla Stadium, New Delhi. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the above mentioned appeal, briefly stated are that the respondents had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum averring therein that the complainants had purchased four tickets each of Rs. 2,000/-, through Canara Bank, for witnessing the One Day Cricket International Match which was to be played between India and England at Ferozshah Kotla Stadium, New Delhi on 31.1.2002. It was stated that on the appointed day the complainants along with other valid ticket hol...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against order dated 23.3.2002, passed by District Forum No. II, Udyog Sadan, Institutional Area, Mehrauli, New Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 2868/1997 entitled Smt. Maya Devi v. Delhi Development Authority. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the respondent Smt. Maya Devi had filed a complaint before the District Forum under Section 12 of the Act averring therein that the appellant Delhi Development Authority (for short DDA) had floated the Ninth Self Finance Scheme, 1996, which was opened on 8.8.1996 and closed on 20.9.1996. It was stated that the respondent had applied for allotment of a flat under the above said scheme vide Application No. 110749 on 20.9.1996 and had made the initial deposit of Rs. 50,000/- as ernest money. It was stated that the appellan...
Tag this Judgment!