Court : Punjab and Haryana
S.J. Vazifdar, ACJ: 1. The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to quash letters dated 13.02.2015 and 14.08.2015 issued by the respondents stating that the draw of successful applicants of type-1 flats for industrial units/entrepreneurs which included the petitioner had been set-aside and informing the petitioners that it had been decided to refund the amount deposited by the petitioner and to hold a draw of lots of all the applicants afresh. The letters stated that the action had been taken as per the order and judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 08.05.2012 in Kapil Dev v. Housing Board Haryana and others in Civil Writ Petition No. 23774 of 2011. The petitioners have also sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to include the flats allotted to them in the draw of lots to be conducted by the respondents. 2. In January, 2010, the respondents issued a brochure offering flats in the categories of industrial workers and industrial units/entrepreneurs of Hary...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Lisa Gill, J. The appellant, Sonia is aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 25.10.2013 passed by the Additional District Judge, Karnal whereby her petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for dissolution of her marriage with respondent Harmesh, has been dismissed. Brief facts of the case are that, marriage between the parties was solemnized on 20.04.2008 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies at village Kunjpura. A child out of this wedlock born at Civil Hospital, Karnal, unfortunately passed away soon after his birth. In the petition under Section 13 of the Act, it is averred that marriage between the parties was solemnized with pomp and show with Rs. 3,50,000/- being spent thereon by the appellant's parents. Prior to the marriage, a ring ceremony was performed at village Kunjpura on 22.04.2007. A cash amount equivalent to price of a motorcycle was given by the appellant's parents to the respondent alongwith jewellery valuing Rs. 1,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
1. This revision is directed against the order dated 30.03.2015, passed by the District Judge (Family Court), Bhiwani who had ordered the husband to undergo imprisonment from 30.03.2015 to 29.03.2016 as he failed to pay Rs.78,000/- as maintenance for 13 months. 2. A petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. was filed by the wife. The husband failed to appear and was proceeded ex-parte. The Family Court, Bhiwani vide order dated 09.05.2013 allowed maintenance of Rs.4,000/- per month to the wife and Rs.2,000/- per month to the child from the date of application. 3. A petition under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. seeking enforcement of the order was filed. Warrants of arrest were issued. The respondent was arrested. He had stated that he had no money to pay. The District Judge (Family Court) Bhiwani, vide order dated 30.03.2015 sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for a period of 12 months starting from 30.03.2015 to 29.03.2016. That order has been assailed. 4. On 22.12.2015 it was submitted before ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Impugned in the present revision petition is the judgment dated 30.05.2015 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Faridabad, affirming the judgment of conviction dated 19.03.2013 and order of sentence dated 21.03.2013 passed by learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad, vide which the present petitioner was convicted for the commission of offence punishable under Section 471 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default thereof to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two weeks. The State machinery was put in to motion on the complaint dated nil (Ex.PW5/A) filed by Sushma Kapoor wife of Sh. Ram Lal Kapoor and Rani Chopra wife of Sh. S.K. Chopra, in which they had stated that they had purchased certain land, situated in Mewla Maharajpur, vide registered sale deed dated 25.05.1981. The same was duly entered in the jamabandi. Now, they have come to know that a forged power of attorney No.127, dated 07...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral): Petitioner Sewa Singh @ Golu had been convicted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rajpura, under section 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act, 1959. He was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. The petitioner preferred appeal against the judgment of his conviction/sentence, which was dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, vide judgment dated 19.08.2015. Feeling aggrieved against the judgments of both the courts below, the petitioner has approached this court through the instant Criminal Revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset states that he is limiting his prayer only to the extent of reduction in the sentence awarded and does not assail the judgment of conviction. He states that he is conscious that scope in the revision is very limited as evidence of the witnesses cannot be re-appreciated or re-evaluated. Learned State counsel, on the other hand submits that in case conviction of petitioner is m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Harinder Singh Sidhu, J. This judgment shall dispose of two writ petitions, referred to above, as similar question is involved in both. For decision facts are being taken from CWP No.1402 of 2002. Petitioners No.1 to 4 are Deputy Secretaries and petitioners No.5 to 22 are the Assistant Secretaries in the respondent No. 4 Haryana Board of School Education ( the Board ). They are aggrieved of the decision of the Pay Revision Committee communicated vide letter dated 14.2.2001 (Annexure P-6) whereby the decision of the respondent- Board regarding revision of the pay scales of the petitioners at par with the pay scales of Kurukshetra University was not approved. The Board considered an agenda regarding non-availability of suitable candidates for appointment to various posts including the posts of Assistant Secretary/ Deputy Secretary due to inadequate pay-scales. It took a decision on 15.10.1993 (Annexure P-1) to give pay-scales to the aforementioned posts at par with equivalent posts in th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Harinder Singh Sidhu, J. The petitioners were appointed as Junior Accountants in October/November, 2010 with the Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited respondent No.1 under the recruitment and promotion policy of Audit and Accounts Wing notified vide HSEB notification dated 9.3.1990 (Annexure P-1) read with amendments vide office order dated 23.6.2008 (Annexure P-2). It is their case that as per the aforesaid Policy, 50% of the posts of Divisional Accountants are to be filled up by direct recruitment. The remaining 50% of the posts of Divisional Accountant are to be filled up by promotion. The 50% promotional posts of Divisional Accountants are to be filled by promotion on seniority-cum-merit basis from amongst the officials of various categories including Junior Accountants having passed Departmental Accounts Examination (SAS Part-I) as prescribed by respondent No.1 and the seniority for the promotion of Divisional Accountants is to be fixed from the date of passing of exam. Responden...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Kuldip Singh, J. By this single judgment, I will dispose of CRM No. M-25881 of 2014 and CRM No. M-32344 of 2014, titled as Vijay Kumar Dhir Versus Vinay Jain and others, filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, arising out of the same order dated 3.7.2014 (Annexure-P-15), passed by the learned Additional Sessions Juge, Moga. For brevity, the facts are extracted from CRM No. M-25881 of 2014. The brief history of the case is that Vijay Kumar Dhir (petitioner) filed a criminal complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Moga, against Luxmi Narayan Shandyal son of Hanuman Parshad Shandyal, Vijay Jain, Vinay (Vini) Raj Modi, Ravinder Pal Singh, Director, Gian Ganga Education Institute and Sachin Shandyal son of Rupinder Shandyal under Sections 420/468/465/467/469/471/120-B IPC, alleging that accused No. 1 Luxmi Narayan Shandyal and his son Upinder Shandyal (since deceased) were the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of Gian Ganga Education Institute, Raipur. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Civil Misc.No.2206-CII of 2016 For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, delay of 57 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. F.A.O.No.770 of 2016 (OandM) The appellant-Haryana Power General Corporation Limited (for short "HPGCL") is aggrieved of the impugned judgment dated 3.9.2015, whereby the objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "1996 Act") seeking setting-aside of the award and corrections to the award dated 1.5.2010, 25.7.2010 and 31.8.2010, have been dismissed. Mr.Puneet Jindal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.Amar Vivek Advocate and Mr.Siddhant Kant, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that on 28.8.1995, HPGCL invited bid proposals to refurbish and uprate 4 Units of 110 MW at the Panipat Thermal Power Station (PTPS) (hereinafter called "the Project"). M/s ABB Alstom Power India Limited-respondent No.2 (for short "APIL") gave the technical and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Oral: Petitioner seeks benefit of regular bail pending trial in case No.RCCHG2015A0016 dated 13.08.2015, under Sections 120- B, IPC read with Sections 8, 17, 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (d) of PC Act 1988, registered by CBI, Chandigarh. Brief facts that would require notice are that the present case was registered in CBI, ACB Chandigarh on 13.08.2015 on the basis of a complaint dated 12.08.2015 made by Smt. Guneet Kaur and a verification report dated 13.08.2015 of Sh. Mohinder Ram, Sub Inspector, CBI ACB, Chandigarh. Complainant has alleged that Smt. Deepa Duggal had got FIR No.375 dated 26.12.2014 under Sections 120-B, 420, 511, 468 and 471 IPC registered against the parents of the complainant, namely, Shri Gurkirpal Singh Chawla, Smt. Jagjit Kaur Chawla as also brother Harmit Singh Chawla in the Economic Offences Wing, UT Police, Sector 17, Chandigarh. The case was in the process of investigation and Sh. Surinder Kumar, Sub Inspector (Present petitioner) was the Investigating Offic...
Tag this Judgment!