Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 1997(2)MPLJ192
ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.1. Petitioner, who is an elected Sarpanch, of Gram Panchayat Goriya Kheda, has preferred this Writ Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the order dated 23-12-1994 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, in Case No. 8-C/144/93-94. By this order, petitioner's election as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat has been set aside on an election petition filed by Respondent No. 3 Under Section 122 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, and the latter has been declared elected as the Sarpanch as contained in Annexure P/9 of the Writ Petition.2. Short facts giving rise to the present application are that election to the office of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Goriya Kheda was held on 7th May, 1994, and petitioner having secured 148 votes and Respondent No. 3 that is election-petitioner having secured 141 votes, the former was declared elected. Respondent No. 3 challenged the election of petitioner by filing an election petition as provided Under Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : [1997]228ITR94(MP)
A.R. Tiwari, J.1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal has stated the case and referred the undernoted question of law arising out of the order dated April 26, 1993, passed by it in Income-tax Application No. 1069/Ind. of 1988, under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), for our consideration and opinion.' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in directing the Assessing Officer to allow deduction in respect of the sales tax and entry tax actually paid by the assessee before filing the return of income for the assessment year 1984-85 '2. Although the Department proposed the undernoted two questions before the Tribunal, the Tribunal elected to refer only one question as noted above concerning applicability of Section 43B of the Act :' 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the ame...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : I(1997)ACC399
S.B. Sakrikar, J.1. The appellant, Oriental Insurance Company (for short, 'the Insurance Company') has directed this appeal against the Award dated 10th January, 1992 passed by II Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Indore in Claim Case No. 49/87, thereby partly allowing the claim petition of respondents No. 1 and 2 and awarding compensation of Rs. 19,195/- together with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of filing of the application till realisation of the amount, in favour of the claimants.2. The facts lie in a narrow compass. On 8th January, 1984, at about 3.30 a.m., respondent No. 4, Bherusing was driving his truck bearing registration No. MBI 9086, from Chandrabhaga, Juni, Indore. As a result of rash and negligent driving, the truck dashed against portion of the house bearing MPL No. 113, situated in Chandrabhaga, Juni, Indore, owned by the complainant/respondents -No. 1 and 2 and caused damage to the said house. It is not in dispute that respondent No. 3, Jagdeesh, was the ...
Tag this Judgment!