Skip to content


Jammu and Kashmir Court November 1987 Judgments Home Cases Jammu and Kashmir 1987 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.031 seconds)

Nov 18 1987 (HC)

Hakim Ghulam Hassan Vs. State of J. and K. and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1988CriLJ1282

ORDERS.M. Rizvi, J.1. In this writ of habeas corpus the detention order No. PSA/DMS/1/87 dated 4-4-1987 passed by the District Magistrate, Srinagar, detaining Mohammad Yusuf Shah S/o Ghulam Rasool Shah r/o Soibugh, Budgam Kashmir, under Section 8 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') has been challenged on many grounds, details whereof are given in the petition.2. Firstly, it would be advantageous to reproduce the grounds of detention, as below, for the sake of reference:'OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SRINAGAR'To,Shri Mohammad Yousuf Shahs/o Ghulam Rasool Shah,R/o Soibugh-Badgam Kashmir.Sub.:- Grounds of detention.There is a report against you that you and your party of which you are Nazim-e-Allah (shoba Tulba) a youth wing of the Jamati-Islamia) is habitual to challenge openly the accession of Jammu and Kashmir with Union of India and also engaged to exploit stray incidents for the purpose of creating serious communal disharmony. In the 'Dar...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1987 (HC)

Executive Engineer, Municipality, Jammu Vs. Inderjeet Singh and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1988J& K72

Anand, C.J.1. At the out set Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal has been wrongly styled as L.P. A. and that it is an appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act and that it be so treated. We grant the prayer.2. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge inArbitration Application No. 150 of 1981 dt. April 8, 1987 and has arisen in the following circumstances :--Respondent No. I, who though served in this appeal is absent, flied a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act seekingdirection from the Court to the respondents in the application to file arbitration agreement in the court and to refer the dispute between the parties to the sole arbitrator. Objections were filed and besides other objections it was stated on behalf of the appellant that there was no arbitration agreement in existence between the parties and, therefore neither the arbitration agreement could be directed to be filed in the court nor the disput...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //