Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Mohit Kapoor & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 06, 2019 CRL.M.C. 665/2019 MOHIT KAPOOR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harsh Goel, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sanjeev Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.461/2015, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station K.N. Katju Marg, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 9th November, 2017 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sanjeev Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide aforesaid M...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Apex Metalloys Pvt. Ltd vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on:25. 01.2019 06.02.2019 + W.P.(C) 7591/2018 & CM APPLN. 29004-05/2018 M/S APEX METALLOYS PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aman Vachher, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr.Yashraj Deora, Mr.Ashutosh Dubey, Ms.Anu Srivastava & Mr.Arun Nagar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr.Viplav Acharya, Mr. Sahil Sood, Ms. Hina Bhargava, Mr. Harshul Choudhary and Ms. Veena Kumari, Director, Ministry of Mines for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT For detailed judgment, see W.P. (C) 7537/2018 titled M/s Standard Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Of India and Ors. dated 06.02.2019. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY06 2019 rd/ab/gb...
Tag this Judgment!Rajender Singh & Anr. Vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
$~8 & 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"6th February, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4721/2016 &Crl.M.A. 19666/2016 RAJENDER SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudershan Rajan & Md. Qamar Ali, Advs. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Harbir Singh, PS R.K. Puram. + CRL.M.C. 745/2018 & Crl.M.A. 2692/2018 RAJENDER SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudershan Rajan & Md. Qamar Ali, Advs. versus Through: THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Harbir Singh, PS R.K. Puram. Mr. M.M. Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both petitions arise out of criminal case relating to first information report (FIR) No.246/2012 of police station R.K. Puram, Crl. M.C. No.4721/2016 & conn Page 1 of 7 registered at the instance of the second respondent on 08.11.2012 alleging offences punishable under Sections 341/323/5of ...
Tag this Judgment!Mahesh Kumar Gupta vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1. * + % W.P.(C) 3811/2017 and C.M. No.16748/2017 MAHESH KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:06. 02.2019 UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition being aggrieved by the order dated 06.03.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.914/2015. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application of the petitioner, wherein the petitioner had sought interest on delayed release of retiral dues of the petitioner.2. The petitioner was serving as Chief Engineer (Construction-II) in the East Central Railway (ECR), Hazipur, Patna. He applied for voluntary retirement under Rule 67 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993, having completed over 20 years of...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Sat Pal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
$~24 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :06. 02.2019 W.P.(C) 1236/2019 SH. SAT PAL Through Mr. A.K. Bhakt, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj and Mr. Shaswat Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) CM APPL. 5601/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1236/2019 The petitioner assails the order dated 20.08.2018 passed by the 1. in OA No.Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (CAT) 310/2016. The Tribunal had rejected the said OA filed by the petitioner since the same was barred by limitation. W.P.(C) 1236/2019 Page 1 of 4 2. The claim of the petitioner was that he was appointed on the post of Cleaner w.e.f. 18.12.1964. Though, he was appointed as Cleaner, he was deputed to perform the duties and the responsibilities of Mistry (Electrician). However, his pay was fixed in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Roshan Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 06, 2019 CRL.M.C. 652/2019, CRL.M.A. 2724/2019 ROSHAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Bhatt, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.230/2013, under Sections 451/354/323/506 of IPC registered at police station Sagarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 02nd February, 2019 of respondent No.2 on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the basis of identity proof produced by her. R...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd Sakib & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 06, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5180/2018 MOHD SAKIB & ORS. Through: Ms. Gizala A. Hashmi, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State. Mr. Azizul Hasan, Advocate with respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.268/2012, under Sections 498-A/406//34 of IPC & Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at police station Welcome Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 24th May, 2013 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by her counsel on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute betw...
Tag this Judgment!Krishan Lal Kumar vs.medical Council of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:06. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 7097/2013 KRISHAN LAL KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Kapil Sankhla, Mr Rishab Dua and Ms : Amanjot Kaur, Advocates alongwith :... Petitioner in person. : Mr T. Singhdev with Mr Tarun Verma and : Ms Puja Sarkar, Advocates for MCI/R- Mr Bapi Das, Advocate for Mr Praveen : Khattar, Advocate for DMC/R- Mr Y.P. Ahuja, Advocate for R- Ms Meenakshi Singh, Advocate for R-4. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the order dated 22.04.2013 (communicated by the letter dated 26.04.2013) passed by the Medical Council of India (MCI). By the said impugned order, the petitioners appeal against an order dated 30.08.2012 passed by the Delhi Medical Council (DMC) was disposed of with the MCI approving ...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Bhawan Upadhyay vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 01.2019. Date of Decision:06. 02.2019. + W.P.(C) 12314/2005 & CM APPL. 26586/2016 (delay in filing affidavit), 29521/2018 (condonation of delay) RAM BHAWAN UPADHYAY ........ Petitioner UOI & ORS. Through In person. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC. Ms.Prema Priyadarshini with Mr.Ashish Shaw, Advs for R-2 & 3. Mr.Neeraj K.Gupta with Mr.Ranjeet Kr.Singh, Adv for BCCL. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J1 JUDGMENT The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated 16.08.2004 passed by the respondent no.3/Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund, whereby he had been informed that he had qualified to become a member of the Coal Mines Provident Fund (hereinafter referred to as CMPF) only w.e.f. January 1969. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondent no.2/Board of Trustees, CMPF to release the payment tow...
Tag this Judgment!Kriyad Yogesh Bhankharia vs.air Chief Marshal Birender Singh Dhanoa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
#2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h February, 2019 CONT.CAS.(CRL) 675/2018 & CM APPL. No.4085/2019 (under Section 151 CPC filed by the petitioner) KRIYAD YOGESH BHANKHARIA ........ Petitioner versus AIR CHIEF MARSHAL BIRENDER SINGH DHANOA. Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Md. Azam Ansari, Advocate along with petitioner in person. For the Respondent :Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC along with Wing Commander Basson for respondent No.1/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Sections 10, 11 & 12, read with Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as well as, Article 215 of the Constitution of India, prays as follows:-"CONT.CAS.(CRL) 675/2018 Page 1 of 4 (a) Summon the contemnor before this Honble Court and after conviction, punish him appropriately for Contempt of Court committed by him of orders dated 13...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »