Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
M/S Sumanta Sushanta Overseas Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Adlakha and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. 11.2014 DECIDED ON :18. 12.2014 + CS(OS) 452/2006 and IA Nos.3062/06,11218/06, 12249-50/06, 10763/07, 2735/08 M/S SUMANTA SUSHANTA OVERSEAS PVT.LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate. VERSUS SANJAY ADLAKHA & ORS. Through : ..... Defendants. Mr.Atul Nigam with Mr.Amit Tiwari, Advocates. Mr.Gyanesh Bhardwaj proxy counsel for L&DO (UOI) Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate, for NDMC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.IA No.18952/2013 (u/O6R17CPC) 1. The plaintiff has instituted the instant suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with its ownership and possession with regard to the suit property shown in red colour in the site plan filed as Annexure A. It is averred that by a registered Agreement to Sell dated 28.09.2004, the suit property bearing No.16-A, IA No.18952/2013 in CS (OS) No.452/2006 1 of 10 Regal Building, Cannought Place, New Delhi-110001, was purchased from Shikha ...
Tag this Judgment!Gaurav Shokeen Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :18. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(CRL) 1161/2014 GAURAV SHOKEEN Through: versus ......Petitioner Mr.Vaibhav Sinha, Adv. STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Mr.Mukesh Gupta, ASC for the State with SI Vikram Singh, PS Mianwali Nagar. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By filing this writ petition, the Petitioner has questioned the order dated 22.04.2014 passed by Addl. DCP (West District), Delhi whereby the Petitioner has been externed from NCT of Delhi for a period of two years and the order dated 07.05.2014 passed by Lt.Governor whereby the appeal filed by the Appellant was dismissed.2. On 04.09.2013, the Addl. DCP (West District) issued a notice to the Petitioner under Section 50 of Delhi Police Act calling upon him to show cause why he should not be externed from NCT of Delhi on account of his involvement in four cases registered within a span of two days i.e. from 25.02.2013 to 27.02.2013.3. ...
Tag this Judgment!S. Thakran Vs. Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5986/2013 Decided on:18. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: S. THAKRAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate versus INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION CO. LTD AND ANR... Respondents Through: Mr.R.K.Vats, Advocate for R-1/IPGCL Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate for Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate for R-2. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner, who was working on the post of PRO with the respondent No.1/IPGCL, has filed the present petition praying inter alia for quashing of the suspension order dated 21.11.2012 and the order dated 26.02.2013 issued by the respondent No.1/IPGCL, whereunder he was informed that pending the departmental inquiry against him, it was decided to release only the provisional pension in his favour. The second relief sought by the petitioner is for issuing directions to the respondents to pay release his retirement benefits of pension, GPF, gratuity, leave encashment, commutation...
Tag this Judgment!Jarafat Ahmad @ Shakil Ahmad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~R-74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 18, 2014 + CRL.A.691/2011 JARAFAT AHMAD @ SHAKIL AHMAD ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The officer on duty at the police control room recorded information in the PCR record at 15:33:18 hours on April 15, 2010, that through mobile phone number 9250661120 an informant (whose name is not legible) informed that at premises RZ-25A, Indira Park, Palam a man had been stabbed : EK ADMI KO CHAKU MAAR DIYA HAI. It also records that after the said information was flashed over the wireless, the police patrol van 2BR-20 relayed the information at 16:53:08 hours that a husband had stabbed his wife. The lady was Rehmat Jahan wife of Sakeel. Said information recorded in the PCR form has been proved at the trial as Ex.PW-2/A. One...
Tag this Judgment!Urvashi Goel and Ors Vs. Parmod Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~A-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18.12.2014 + MAC.APP. 789/2006, MAC.APP.790-791/2006 URVASHI GOEL & ORS Through versus PARMOD KUMAR & ORS. Through ..... Appellant Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocates. ..... Respondent Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Advocate for R-3 Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in its Award dated 4.8.2006.2. The brief facts are that Shri R.L.Goel the deceased who was 42 years and a Chartered Accountant by profession was while driving his own santro car with other relatives was going from Delhi to Khatroli on 4.3.2003. At Dadri, District Meerut the car was hit by a bus said to be driven at a very high speed in a careless and negligent manner. The deceased R.L.Goel died on the spot and the other occupants of the car suffered injuries.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal awarded ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramona Jind Vs. Sohnu Mohan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Cont. Cas (C) No.170/2014 Decided on:18. h December, 2014 RAMONA JIND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Chauhan & Mr. Varun Jain, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus SOHNU MOHAN Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Prag Chawla & Mr. Abhey Narula, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition is premised on the fact that the respondent has wilfully breached his undertaking purported to have been given to the court on 25.7.2013.2. The petitioner and the respondent apparently seem to be having a matrimonial dispute which resulted in filing of Crl. M. (C) No.3731/2012. The parties have two children from the wedlock, who are informed to be US citizens. The petitioner is also a US citizen but presently she is in India and the respondent also happens to be a US citizen, stationed in America.3. During the pendency of the aforesaid petition, on 25.7.2013, the learned senior counsel appearing for t...
Tag this Judgment!Mount Carmel School Society Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.1687/2014 Decided on :18. h December, 2014 MOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL SOCIETY Petitioner Through: Dr. Jose Verghese, Mr. Jawahar Singh & Ms. Priya Singh, Advocates. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. for DDA. Ms. Zubeda Begum, SC for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.17983/2014 1. This is an application for staying the construction raised by respondent Nos.2 and 3 in respect of plot of land in question, which is purported to have been allotted to the petitioner. Alternatively, the petitioner has prayed for grant of an order of status quo.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.3. The case of the petitioner is that it has been allotted only two acres of land while as its case was recommended in the year 1996 for four acres of land. It is contended by Mr. Jose, the learned counsel for the p...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Muncipal Corporation and Ors. Vs. M/S. Graphisads Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. No.11 /2014 18th December, 2014 % NORTH DELHI MUNCIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ......Petitioners Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate. VERSUS M/S. GRAPHISADS PVT. LTD. Through: ...... Respondent Mr. R.K. Mittal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit namely North Delhi Municipal Corporation and its two officers impugning the order of the trial court dated 17.8.2013 which has dismissed the application filed by the petitioners/defendants for rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the ground that the suit is barred by limitation.2. The subject suit for recovery of Rs.20 lacs has been filed by the respondent/plaintiff, who was a registered advertiser of the petitioner no.1. It was the case of the respondent/plaintiff in the plaint that it wa...
Tag this Judgment!Ifci Factors Ltd. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:18. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4184/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adovcate for R-2 to R-4. + CRL. M.C. 4775/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Prshant Manchanda, Adovcate for R-2 to R-6. + CRL. M.C. 4776/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Crl. M.C. No.4184/2014 & connected matters Through: + Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Prshant Manchanda, Adovcate for R-2 to R-6. CRL. M.C. 4795/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Resp...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Chand Sharma Vs. The Director of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2423/2014 Decided on:18. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: SURESH CHAND SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.P. Gupta, Advocate versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 to R-3/DOE with Mr. R.K. Gupta, DOE. Ms. Pushti Gupta, Adv. for R-4 and R-5/School. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for issuance of directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 /Directorate of Education (DOE) and the respondents No.4 & 5/School for releasing his salaries for the period w.e.f. 1.7.2013 to 05.12.2013, alongwith interest. Further, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondent No.2 to modify the re-employment order dated 06.12.2013, to make it effective from 1.7.2013 instead of 06.12.2013.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was working on the post of Vice-Principal in the respondent No....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »