Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 28 of about 1,089 results (0.022 seconds)Rizwan Perwez and Ors Vs. State (Govt of Nct Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5603/2014 RIZWAN PERWEZ & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Krishna Kumar & Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocates with petitioners. Versus STATE(GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. P.K.Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. S. S. Dahiya & Mr. L. K. Dahiya, Advocates with R2/complainant. Sub Inspector Kamlesh Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A. 19141/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5603/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.189/2013, registered under Sections 420, 468, 471, 34 IPC at police station Aman Vihar on 11.05.2013, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. S. S. Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.2/...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Om Prakash and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.616/2008 & CM No.7332/2008 (stay) 18th December, 2014 % SH. OM PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. K.G.Chhokar, Adv. VERSUS UOI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. S.P.Sharma with Dr. Ashwani Bharadwaj, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Gajendra Giri, Adv. for R-3. Mr. J.K.Jain, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the interested persons (I.Ps) in the proceedings which are pending before the Land Acquisition Court under Sections 30-31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short the Act), impugning the order of the LAC court dated 16.2.2008 by which the LAC court has allowed two applications under Order XXII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by respondents no.3 and 4 herein namely M/s Jacks Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Man Sarovar Irrigation Pvt. Ltd. for the...
Tag this Judgment!Ifci Factors Ltd. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:18. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4184/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adovcate for R-2 to R-4. + CRL. M.C. 4775/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Prshant Manchanda, Adovcate for R-2 to R-6. + CRL. M.C. 4776/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Crl. M.C. No.4184/2014 & connected matters Through: + Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Prshant Manchanda, Adovcate for R-2 to R-6. CRL. M.C. 4795/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Resp...
Tag this Judgment!Shanti and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.270 of 2010 SHANTI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal and Mr. A.N. Aggarwal, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP for the State. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar & Mr. Ram Kamal Prasad, Advocates for Complainant. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1812.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 6th February 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.24 of 2008, convicting the appellants for the offences under Sections 452 IPC and 308/34 of IPC and the order on sentence dated 11th February 2010 sentencing each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of two years with a fine of Rs.2,000 each and in default, simple imprisonment (SI) for six months for the offence under Section 452 IPC and RI for a period of 2 years with fine of Rs.1,000 each and in default to undergo SI for three months for the offence under Section 308/34 of IP...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Arora and Anr Vs. Ajay Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on:18th December, 2014 + CS(OS) 788/2010 RAJ KUMAR ARORA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Sanjay Goswami, Adv. versus AJAY KUMAR Through ..... Defendant Mr. Gautam Narayan, Adv. with Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The plaintiffs namely Mr. Raj Kumar Arora and Mr. Satish Arora have filed the suit for partition in respect of property bearing No.C135-136, New Multan Nagar, Delhi-110056 (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property"). The plaintiffs and defendant namely Ajay Kumar are real brothers. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the suit property is the joint property of the plaintiffs and the defendant.2. The case of the defendant is that the suit property is his self- acquired property and has never been the joint property. The plaintiffs have no right, title, interest or claim in the suit property. The suit is wholly on false, misleading and baseless. The d...
Tag this Judgment!Hdfc Standard Life Insurance Company Vs. Pension Fund Regulatory and D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 4709/2014 HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR .... Petitioners versus PENSION FUND REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocate with Mr Aman Gandhi. For the Respondent : Mr Bharat Sangal & Ms Anasuya Choudhury. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE I. S. MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the letter dated 23.07.2014 issued by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority in the context of the Request For Proposal (RFP) issued by the said authority on 16.01.2014. By virtue of the said letter dated 23.07.2014, the said authority has informed the petitioner that the proposal submitted by it on 13.12.2014 had been evaluated under clause 3.1 of the RFP and that the petitioner was found to have not fulfilled th...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. 12.2014 Pronounced on :18.12.2014 % + CRL.A. 1380/2014 VINOD KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.Chaubey and Mr.A.K.Mishra, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the Appellant Vinod Kumar impugning his conviction under Section 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 read with Section 354/341 IPC vide judgment dated 16.07.2014 as well as sentence awarded to him vide order dated 22.07.2014.2. The Appellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 15 days for committing the offence punishable under Section 10 of POCSO Act. However, no separate sentence was awarded for the offence punishable under Sections 354/341 IPC.3. I have heard Mr.A.K.Chaubey, Advocate for the Appellant and Ms.Rajdipa Beh...
Tag this Judgment!Pk Agrawal Vs. Ndmc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
12 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4544/2010 PK AGRAWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person with Ms. Mercy Hussain, Advocate. versus NDMC ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, Advocate with Ms. Sidhi Arora and Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Advocates. Date of Decision :18. h December, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to grant vacancy remission under Section 110 of the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 (for short Act, 1994) for the period Flat No.817A, Amba Deep, 14 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110 001 measuring 292 sq. ft. of super area remained vacant.2. Petitioner, who appears in person, submits that the only requirement for grant of remission is that the property should have remained vacant and unproductive of rent for more than sixty days.3. He contends that in the present case the vacancy remission has been denied only on the ...
Tag this Judgment!Gnct of Delhi and Ors Vs. Arun Rawat and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:18. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 2208/2011 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms.Latika Chaudhry, Adv. versus ARUN RAWAT & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sameer Sharma and Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The narrow question which the petitioner i.e., the Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSB) urges, in these proceedings challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench in OA No.3193/09, is whether the respondent-applicant was eligible to apply and secure appointment as Junior Engineer (Civil). It is urged by DSSB that the applicant had exceeded the age limits prescribed.2. Briefly the facts are that the applicant was selected as an LDC through the Staff Selection Commission in the Employees Provident Fund Organisation, which he joined on 09.06....
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.577 of 2010 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma and Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1812.2014 1. The present appeal is by Sanjay, Accused No.1, the husband of the deceased Rekha, against the judgment dated 21st April 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.129 of 2009 convicting him for the offences under Section 304B IPC and Section 498A IPC and the order on sentence dated 26th April 2010 whereby he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 10 years for the offence under Section 304B IPC and simple imprisonment (SI) for 1 year along-with fine of Rs.3,000 and in default to undergo SI for 3 months for the offence under Section 498A IPC.2. It must be noted at the outset that as per the nominal roll dated 9th October 2014, the Appellant has already served 4 years 7 month...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »