Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 27 of about 1,089 results (0.012 seconds)Gaurav Shokeen Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :18. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(CRL) 1161/2014 GAURAV SHOKEEN Through: versus ......Petitioner Mr.Vaibhav Sinha, Adv. STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Mr.Mukesh Gupta, ASC for the State with SI Vikram Singh, PS Mianwali Nagar. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By filing this writ petition, the Petitioner has questioned the order dated 22.04.2014 passed by Addl. DCP (West District), Delhi whereby the Petitioner has been externed from NCT of Delhi for a period of two years and the order dated 07.05.2014 passed by Lt.Governor whereby the appeal filed by the Appellant was dismissed.2. On 04.09.2013, the Addl. DCP (West District) issued a notice to the Petitioner under Section 50 of Delhi Police Act calling upon him to show cause why he should not be externed from NCT of Delhi on account of his involvement in four cases registered within a span of two days i.e. from 25.02.2013 to 27.02.2013.3. ...
Tag this Judgment!Sushil Kumar Vs. The Director of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1582/2014 Decided on:18. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. K.P. Gupta, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Amiet Andley, Advocate for R-1 to 3/DOE. Ms. Pushti Gupta, Advocate for R-4 & 5. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for issuance of directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 /Directorate of Education (DOE) and the respondents No.4 & 5/School for releasing his salaries for the period w.e.f. 1.7.2013 to 28.11.2013, alongwith interest. Further, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondent No.2 to modify the re-employment order dated 29.11.2013, to make it effective from 1.7.2013 instead of 29.11.2013.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was working on the post of Principal in the respondent No.4/School, which i...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Muncipal Corporation and Ors. Vs. M/S. Graphisads Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. No.11 /2014 18th December, 2014 % NORTH DELHI MUNCIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ......Petitioners Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate. VERSUS M/S. GRAPHISADS PVT. LTD. Through: ...... Respondent Mr. R.K. Mittal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit namely North Delhi Municipal Corporation and its two officers impugning the order of the trial court dated 17.8.2013 which has dismissed the application filed by the petitioners/defendants for rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the ground that the suit is barred by limitation.2. The subject suit for recovery of Rs.20 lacs has been filed by the respondent/plaintiff, who was a registered advertiser of the petitioner no.1. It was the case of the respondent/plaintiff in the plaint that it wa...
Tag this Judgment!Ifci Factors Ltd. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:18. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4184/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adovcate for R-2 to R-4. + CRL. M.C. 4775/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Prshant Manchanda, Adovcate for R-2 to R-6. + CRL. M.C. 4776/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Crl. M.C. No.4184/2014 & connected matters Through: + Mr. Karan Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Prshant Manchanda, Adovcate for R-2 to R-6. CRL. M.C. 4795/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Resp...
Tag this Judgment!Hdfc Standard Life Insurance Company Vs. Pension Fund Regulatory and D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 4709/2014 HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR .... Petitioners versus PENSION FUND REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocate with Mr Aman Gandhi. For the Respondent : Mr Bharat Sangal & Ms Anasuya Choudhury. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE I. S. MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the letter dated 23.07.2014 issued by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority in the context of the Request For Proposal (RFP) issued by the said authority on 16.01.2014. By virtue of the said letter dated 23.07.2014, the said authority has informed the petitioner that the proposal submitted by it on 13.12.2014 had been evaluated under clause 3.1 of the RFP and that the petitioner was found to have not fulfilled th...
Tag this Judgment!Rizwan Perwez and Ors Vs. State (Govt of Nct Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5603/2014 RIZWAN PERWEZ & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Krishna Kumar & Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocates with petitioners. Versus STATE(GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. P.K.Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. S. S. Dahiya & Mr. L. K. Dahiya, Advocates with R2/complainant. Sub Inspector Kamlesh Kumar, P.S. Aman Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A. 19141/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5603/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.189/2013, registered under Sections 420, 468, 471, 34 IPC at police station Aman Vihar on 11.05.2013, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. S. S. Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.2/...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Arora and Anr Vs. Ajay Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on:18th December, 2014 + CS(OS) 788/2010 RAJ KUMAR ARORA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Sanjay Goswami, Adv. versus AJAY KUMAR Through ..... Defendant Mr. Gautam Narayan, Adv. with Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The plaintiffs namely Mr. Raj Kumar Arora and Mr. Satish Arora have filed the suit for partition in respect of property bearing No.C135-136, New Multan Nagar, Delhi-110056 (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property"). The plaintiffs and defendant namely Ajay Kumar are real brothers. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the suit property is the joint property of the plaintiffs and the defendant.2. The case of the defendant is that the suit property is his self- acquired property and has never been the joint property. The plaintiffs have no right, title, interest or claim in the suit property. The suit is wholly on false, misleading and baseless. The d...
Tag this Judgment!Lokesh Thukral Vs. Select Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:18. hDecember, 2014 % + CS (OS) No.3485/2014 LOKESH THUKRAL Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Vibhor Garg, Adv. versus SELECT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ....Defendant Through Mr. Pavit Singh Katoch and Mr. Rajat Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction restraining infringement of trademark Food Fiesta, dilution, passing off, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and cost etc. against the defendant.2. The matter was listed on 18th November, 2014 before Court when after hearing the defendant and its agents were restrained from using the trademark Food Fiesta in respect of the similar business as that of the plaintiff.3. It is averred in the plaint that the plaintiff is a leading Food and Drink and Catering Service Provider and has been consistently providing the said services for the past 25 years and has strived and su...
Tag this Judgment!Tikam Chand Jaiswal Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4500/2014 TIKAM CHAND JAISWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Shashi Kumar, PS Moti Nagar. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 15423/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 4500/2014 and Crl. M.A. 15422/2014 (for stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.404/2014 registered under Section 420 IPC at Police Station Moti Nagar on 6th May, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Complaina...
Tag this Judgment!Urvashi Goel and Ors Vs. Parmod Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~A-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18.12.2014 + MAC.APP. 789/2006, MAC.APP.790-791/2006 URVASHI GOEL & ORS Through versus PARMOD KUMAR & ORS. Through ..... Appellant Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocates. ..... Respondent Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Advocate for R-3 Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in its Award dated 4.8.2006.2. The brief facts are that Shri R.L.Goel the deceased who was 42 years and a Chartered Accountant by profession was while driving his own santro car with other relatives was going from Delhi to Khatroli on 4.3.2003. At Dadri, District Meerut the car was hit by a bus said to be driven at a very high speed in a careless and negligent manner. The deceased R.L.Goel died on the spot and the other occupants of the car suffered injuries.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal awarded ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »