Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Rama Peer Trader Vs. Scot Innovation Wires and Cables Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h December, 2013 Date of Decision:9. h January, 2014 % + CO.PET. 453/2012 RAMA PEER TRADER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr Rana S Biswas and Mr Sunil Kr. Sharma, Advocates. versus SCOT INNOVATION WIRES AND CABLES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A. K. Jain and Ms. Monica Kapoor, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is a petition filed by M/s Rama Peer Trader under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of M/s Scot Innovation Wires and Cables Pvt. Ltd.2. The petitioner is a proprietary firm of one Sitaram Solanki, engaged in the business of manufacturing renewable plastic granules/grains which are prepared from discarded plastic items. In July 2011, the petitioner was approached by the respondent-company for supply of the above material, to be used in the manufacture of cables. It is claimed by the petitioner that he had informed the respondent that the renewab...
Tag this Judgment!Ravinder Kumar Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :09. h JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 397/2001 RAVINDER KUMAR Through : ....Appellant Mr.Anil Aggarwal, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through : .Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Ravinder Kumar (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 02.05.2001 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.50/2000 arising out of FIR No.184/96 PS Anand Vihar by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and by an order on sentence dated 04.05.2001, he was awarded RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 16.08.1996 in between 08.45 P.M. to 09.00 P.M. at house No.381, Karkardooma, he inflicted injuries by a knife to Hukam Singh in an attempt to commit murder. The occurrence took place about 09.00 P.M. The victim Hukam Singh was taken to GTB Hospital from the spot. MLC (Ex.PW-5/A) records th...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: January 09, 2014 + CRL.A. 321/2011 RAJ KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Advocate, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Dinesh Kumar, Police Station Tilak Marg, New Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Challenge in the present appeal is the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 02.12.2009, whereby the learned District Judge had convicted the appellant for the commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.2. The case of the prosecution as it was unfolded in the charge sheet can be summarised as under:O...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Satish Chand and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:9. h January, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 234/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Shantanu Bhardwaj for Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus SATISH CHAND & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Nishant Kumar Srivastava, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Nalin L. Sahay, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM NoS. 12503/2012 (for directions) & 14653/2013 (U/s 151 CPC) As reported, in pursuance of order dated 25.09.2013, the appellant/Insurance Company has deposited the amount, therefore, both these applications have become infructuous. The same are accordingly dismissed. MAC.APP. 234/2011 1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/Insurance Company has assailed the impugned award dated 29.11.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.6,37,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from th...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Gupta Vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:09. 01.2014 + + CRL.A. 1254/2010 & Crl.MAs 16637/2010 (stay) & 392/2011 (delay) RAJ SOLVEX PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCMENT DIRECTORTE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. CRL.A. 1255/2010 & Crl.MAs 16639/2010 (stay) & 190/2011 (delay) PREM KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. + CRL.A. 1256/2010 & Crl.MAs 16641/2010 (stay) & 393/2011 (delay) RAJ KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ....
Tag this Judgment!Prem Kumar Gupta Vs. Special Director Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:09. 01.2014 + + CRL.A. 1254/2010 & Crl.MAs 16637/2010 (stay) & 392/2011 (delay) RAJ SOLVEX PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCMENT DIRECTORTE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. CRL.A. 1255/2010 & Crl.MAs 16639/2010 (stay) & 190/2011 (delay) PREM KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. + CRL.A. 1256/2010 & Crl.MAs 16641/2010 (stay) & 393/2011 (delay) RAJ KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ....
Tag this Judgment!Shri Sourabh Agarwal Vs. Sh. Megh Raj Mansharamani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.179/2013 9th January , 2014 % SHRI SOURABH AGARWAL Through: ......Appellant Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS SH. MEGH RAJ MANSHARAMANI ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Jalan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the concurrent judgments of the Courts below; of the trial Court dated 8.10.2012 and the appellate Court dated 31.7.2013; by which the suit for possession filed by the respondent/plaintiff was decreed under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.2. In Delhi, in order to maintain the suit for possession in a civil court against the tenant, it is necessary that the following facts must exist:(i) There is a relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties; (ii) The rate of rent of the premises is more than Rs.3,500/- per month; and (iii) The te...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Solvex Pvt Ltd Vs. Special Director, Enforcment Directorte
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:09. 01.2014 + + CRL.A. 1254/2010 & Crl.MAs 16637/2010 (stay) & 392/2011 (delay) RAJ SOLVEX PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCMENT DIRECTORTE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. CRL.A. 1255/2010 & Crl.MAs 16639/2010 (stay) & 190/2011 (delay) PREM KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. + CRL.A. 1256/2010 & Crl.MAs 16641/2010 (stay) & 393/2011 (delay) RAJ KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ....
Tag this Judgment!Shyam Kishore Vs. M.C.D.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.118/2007 & CM Nos. 5739/2007 (Stay) & 390/14 (U/s 100 & 151 CPC) % 9th January , 2014 SHYAM KISHORE ......Appellant Through: Mr. B.B.Jain, Advocate. VERSUS M.C.D. Through: ...... Respondent Ms. Amita Gupta and Mr. Ramakant Tripathi, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This regular second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC impugns the judgment of the first appellate court dated 12.2.2007 whereby the appellate court set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court dated 5.10.1985. The suit was a suit for injunction filed by the appellants-plaintiffs challenging the enhancement of the property tax.2. The trial court by the judgment and decree dated 5.10.1985 holding the suit to be maintainable in civil court has passed the judgment on merits holding that the property taxes as claimed by the respondent are not payable. The trial court had decided all ...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:09. 01.2014 + + CRL.A. 1254/2010 & Crl.MAs 16637/2010 (stay) & 392/2011 (delay) RAJ SOLVEX PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCMENT DIRECTORTE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. CRL.A. 1255/2010 & Crl.MAs 16639/2010 (stay) & 190/2011 (delay) PREM KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SGC, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. + CRL.A. 1256/2010 & Crl.MAs 16641/2010 (stay) & 393/2011 (delay) RAJ KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Virmani, senior advocate with Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advs. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »