Delhi Court April 2010 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2010 Page 23 of about 223 results (0.017 seconds)In the Matter Of: Lt Col Jp Singh Versus Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
1. The applicant filed a writ petition (civil) No. 2634 of 2003 in the Honble Delhi High Court for expunging annual confidential reports (ACR) and setting aside the order dated 3.7.2002 by which his statutory complaint was rejected with further direction for promotion to the rank of colonel with all consequential benefits. The same was transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal. 2. The applicant was commissioned on 17.3.1979 in 62 Cavalry of the Armoured Regiment. In due course he was promoted upto the rank of Lt Col by Selection. He was not empanelled to the rank of colonel by Selection Board No. 3 held between 27-30 September 1999 thus he submitted a non statutory complaint on 26.12.1999. This was rejected by the Chief of Army Staff on 27.4.2000. The applicant submitted a statutory complaint on 12.6.2000 (Annexure A). The same was also rejected on 3.7.2002 (Annexure B). 3. The applicant contends that he has an excellent profile and service record except for the impugned Annual Confid...
Tag this Judgment!Maj. Manmohan Singh Battu Versus Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
1. This petition is directed against the orders dated 25th August1989 passed by the Central Government and dated 12th February 1986 passed by the General Officer Commanding, 14 Infantry Division, whereby the petitioner was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 63 of the Army Act and sentenced him to severe reprimand. 2. The petitioner is alleged to have abetted Lt. Col. Daljit Singh Kohli (i) in unauthorisedly operating Non CSD private account by signing daily sale summaries of Non CSD items; (ii) in stocking of unauthorised goods for sale in unit canteen contrary to Army Order 355/71 which forbade stocking of Non CSD stores in canteens, (iii) in sale of regimental accessories at higher cost, and (iv) for making an entry in the unit columnar cash account book for an amount of Rs.9000/- showing as advance. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the three bottles of liquor charges of abetment for the alleged offence are not sustainable since the principal accused has no...
Tag this Judgment!Major Ss Chillar Versus Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
1. Petitioner by this Writ Petition has prayed that by an appropriate writ or direction finding and sentence awarded by General Court Martial vide its order dated 18th November, 1987 and its confirmation by the Confirming Authority may be quashed and petitioner may be reinstated with full back wages and consequential benefits. He also prayed that injuries, which were received by him in the grenade blast, are attributable to military service. He further prayed that Judge Advocate has misconducted in the General Court Martial proceedings, action may be taken against him for misconduct. 2. Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this petition are that the petitioner was charged for an offence under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 committing a civil offence under suspicious circumstances, contrary to Section of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. Petitioner was tried by General Court Martial at Delhi Cantt from 11th August, 1987 to 18th November, 1987. He was found guilty and dism...
Tag this Judgment!