Delhi Court March 2010 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2010 Page 4 of about 197 results (0.017 seconds)Smt. Indu Khorana Vs. Gram Sabha and ors.
Court: Delhi
Veena Birbal, J.1. A Single Judge of this Court, while hearing the present petition, has made a reference to the Larger Bench for considering certain questions of law as stated in order dated 25.08.2004. This petition is therefore referred to this Bench for answering the reference.2. Briefly, the facts of the case are as under:Petitioner is the owner/bhoomidar of land situated in village Kaikorola bearing khasra No. 106/12 min. measuring 1 bigha and 9 biswas. Petitioner constructed a small shed on a piece of land measuring 100 sq. yards for the storage of gas cylinders for which permission was granted by the Delhi Fire Department and also for the storage of implements required for carrying out agricultural activities. A major portion of the land, i.e. 1 bigha and 8 biswas is being used for agricultural purposes only. Petitioner has alleged that the village Kaikorola including the land in question along with the entire abadi land and the Revenue Estate of village has been urbanized by t...
Tag this Judgment!Sat Prakash and ors. Vs. Jagdish and ors.
Court: Delhi
J.R. Midha, J.1. The appellants have challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs. 1,17,600/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.2. The accident dated 25th February, 1990 resulted in the death of Bal Kishan. The deceased was survived by two sons, one daughter, legal representatives of pre-deceased daughter and mother who filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal.3. The deceased was aged 50 years at the time of the accident and was helping his father in agriculture and dairy business. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs. 881/- per month according to the minimum wages and Rs. 1,200/- per month from his agriculture work. The total income of the deceased was taken at Rs. 2,080/-per month. 1/3rd was deducted towards his personal expenses and the multiplier of 7 was applied to compute the loss of dependency at Rs. 1,17,600/-.4. The learned Counsel for the appellants has urged the ...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Ashok Chopra, Vs. Syndicate Bank and anr.
Court: Delhi
Indermeet Kaur, J.1. Plaintiffs have filed this suit for recovery of Rs. 53,04329/-. Plaintiff had vide registered lease deed dated 13.7.1993 leased out an area of 4010 sq. ft. on the first and second floor of the property No. 1377, Kashmere Gate, Delhi at a monthly rent of Rs. 33,684/- to the defendant bank. This lease was to commence from 1.4.1989 and was to expire on 31.3.1994. On 14.12.1993 plaintiffs informed the defendants that since the lease was to expire on 31.3.1994 in case the defendant was interested in renewal he would have to pay the market rate. This was reiterated in the letter dated 6.1.1994; plaintiff had offered to renew the lease at Rs. 27 per sq. ft. per month. On 9.3.1994, plaintiff had informed the defendant not to credit the rent in their account from 1.4.1994 till the renewal of the lease as is mutually decided between the parties. On 21.4.1994 in the inter se negotiations between the parties defendant agreed to increase the rent by 50% over the previous rent o...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The petitioner is the owner of land measuring 12 bighas and 10 biswas situated in khasra Nos. 137 min (4-10), 138 min (4-3), 136 min (3-17) situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Mehrauli, New Delhi. The petitioner claims to have constructed a farmhouse on the said land after obtaining permission from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi on 19.4.1990 and the completion certificate was issued on 28.9.1993.2. A notification was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) notifying the intention of the State to acquire the land of the petitioner along with land of others. The avowed public purpose for the land was stated to be building of Vasant Kunj Residential Scheme. The said notification also specified that the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi was satisfied that a case was made out to invoke the emergency provisions and thus the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 17 of the said Act were applicable to th...
Tag this Judgment!Prem Pal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. The learned Trial Judge has held that the evidence led by the prosecution has proved that the deceased Shri Dharampal was last seen in the company of the appellants on the day when Dharampal died. It has further been held that the prosecution has established that the muffler used as the ligature material to strangulate Dharampal to death which was found tied around the neck of Dharampal when his dead body was detected was proved to be belonging to appellant Prem Pal. The learned Trial Judge has further held that the prosecution has successfully proved that the pair of shoes Ex.P-17 recovered from the bushes near the place where the dead body of Dharampal was recovered were got recovered by appellant Mahi Lal. Lastly, the learned Trial Judge has held that from the testimony of Anita PW-1, the wife of the deceased a motive has been proved i.e. a fight between the appellants and the deceased over money. From the trinity of circumstances against the appellants i.e. ...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sukhvinder Singh Shagufa
Court: Delhi
Mool Chand Garg, J.1. The short point involved in this matter is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to postpone the increment of the respondent from 1.3.1996 to 1.3.1997 relying upon the Office Memorandum dated 22.7.1998, which is available at page 151.2. Briefly stating, the facts of this case are that the respondent who was working as Mono-Operator in Government of India Press, Faridabad, New Delhi after reaching the maximum in the pay scale of Rs. 1320-2040/- was conferred the next pay scale i.e. pay scale of Rs. 1600-2600/- in terms of Office Memorandum dated 13.9.1991 w.e.f. 1.3.1996, which was applicable to his case at the relevant time and was conferred to him on 1.1.1996 instead of 1.3.1996 when the Fifth Pay Commission came into being and was made effective from 1.1.1996, the said pay scale was revised to the pay scale of Rs. 5000-8000/- with effect from 1.3.1996. An approval to this effect was also granted by the Ministry of Urban Development. In fact, even the Minist...
Tag this Judgment!Anurag Kumar Gangwar @ Deepu Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
V.K. Jain, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing FIR No. 292/2009 registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar under Section 363 of IPC and for directing Respondents No. 1 and 2 to release Respondent No. 3, who is the wife of the petitioner.2. The FIR in this case was lodged by Shri Rakesh Kumar, father of Respondent No. 3, who alleged that his daughter had left the house on 17th June, 2009 for some work and had not returned. He suspected that Anurag Kumar had kidnapped his daughter.3. Respondent No. 3 as well as her parents are present in the Court. On the request of the complainant, who is the father of Respondent No. 3, he was given opportunity to talk to respondent No. 3. Thereafter, I have recorded the statement of Respondent No. 3 as well as of the complainant. According to Respondent No. 3, she left the house of her parents on 10th June, 2009 of her own without any pressure, inducement, influence, promise or representation from the petitioner Anu...
Tag this Judgment!Consep India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cepco Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Reva Khetrapal, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd May, 2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in a suit for ejectment, recovery of mesne profits and permanent injunction filed by the respondent against the appellant herein.2. The facts as they emerge from the record are that the appellant was inducted as a tenant under the respondent with respect to one big hall, one office room and one WC, all measuring 900 sq. ft. with a common passage on the second floor of property No. F-14/15, Connaught Place, New Delhi of the respondent. The said premises were let out by the respondent to the appellant by an agreement dated 1st December, 1976, whereunder the appellant had agreed to pay rent to the respondent at the rate of Rs. 2,700/- p.m. for the first three years and at the rate of Rs. 3,240/- p.m. for the next two years and at the rate of Rs. 3,780/- p.m. to the respondent after five years of 01.12.1976, i.e., with effect from 01.12.1981.3. O...
Tag this Judgment!Girajo Devi and ors. Vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Court: Delhi
Ajit Bharihoke, J.1. The appellants Girajo Devi, Ram Bahadur, Satender @ Satte and Ramesh Chand have preferred this joint appeal against impugned judgment dated 17th October, 1995 in Sessions Case No. 109/90, FIR No. 242/90, P.S. Malviya Nagar in terms of which the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 498A and 304B, both read with Section 34 IPC as also against the consequent order on sentence dated 18th October, 1995 in terms of which all the appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- each, in default of payment of which, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for further period of six months for the offences under Section 304B/34 IPC and also to undergo rigorous imprisonment for the period of three years and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/- each, in default of payment of which, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for the period of three months respectively under Section 498A/34 IPC.2. During the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Salamat Ali Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 10.8.2009 the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. The appellant has been acquitted of the charge for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and Section 201 IPC.2. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that deceased Sabina Khatoon, aged about 8 years, left her house at around 10:00 AM on 20.1.2006 and did not return home. Her dead body was noted by somebody near Ganda Nala, Madhav Setu on Naraina Road, information whereof was passed on at the local police station where the same was noted vide DD No. 7 at around 12:30 noon on 23.1.2006. Mohd.Mustafa, father of Sabina Khatoon, also received the information of the dead body of a young girl being found and accordingly he reached the spot. He made the statement Ex.PW-2/C to the police officer who had reached the spot, as per which Mohd. Mustafa told the investigating officer that his daughter Angoori was married to the app...
Tag this Judgment!