Delhi Court December 2010 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2010 Page 7 of about 211 results (0.025 seconds)Satwant Singh Devgan Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
1. This is a suit for mandatory injunction and possession.2. The case of the plaintiff is that he is the owner of the land bearing No.WZ 133-A, Srinagar, Shakarpur, Delhi, admeasuring 150 sq. yds., which has been carved out of Khasra No.30/11 of village Shakarpur, Delhi. It is also alleged in the plaint that the defendants have illegally dispossessed the plaintiff from the suit property and have clandestinely merged the same with a municipal park. It is further alleged that on 6.11.2000, the officials of DDA came to the suit property and started demolishing the structure. The plaintiff thereupon was constrained to file a suit for permanent injunction in which DDA claimed that the suit property falls in Khasra No.30/26/1 min.3. When questioned about the date on which the plaintiff was dispossessed from the suit property, the learned counsel for the plaintiff states that though the date on which the plaintiff was dispossessed from the suit property has not been given in the plaint, the d...
Tag this Judgment!Hemant Verma Vs. Sh. Gulshan Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
1. This is an application for restoration of water supply to the portion occupied by the plaintiff in the suit property. The case of the plaintiff is that the water supply to the portion occupied by him was blocked by defendants 1 and 2, which later also removed the water pipe which goes to the first floor and threw it on the door of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has accordingly sought restoration of the water supply to the first floor portion occupied by him in the suit property.2. The application has been opposed by defendants 1 and 2. The learned counsel appearing for defendants 1 and 2 states that the portion occupied unauthorisedly by the plaintiff on the first floor of the suit property never had water supply in it and there is a false averment alleging removal of pipe by defendants 1 and 2. A perusal of the record of the Local Commissioner dated 18th March 2009 shows that the portion found to be in possession of the plaintiff on first floor comprise two rooms, one kitchen, one ba...
Tag this Judgment!Holiday Home Vs. R.P. Kapur Huf
Court: Delhi
This is an appeal filed by the appellant, who was a tenant of premises no. A-2/11, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi (hereinafter to be referred as the premises in suit) of the respondent herein, against the judgment and decree dated 18th July, 2007 whereby the suit filed by the respondent-landlord for possession, damages/mesne profits etc. in respect of the suit premises had been decreed.2. The respondent-plaintiff(hereinafter to be referred as the plaintiff) had filed a suit for recovery of possession, damages, mesne profits for unauthorized use and occupation of the premises in suit against the appellant(hereinafter to be referred as the defendant), inter-alia, on the allegations that the premises in suit were let out to the defendant for lodging purposes only but the defendant had not only started using the same for non-residential purposes, which was against the terms of the perpetual lease executed in favour of the plaintiff by the President of India, but had also illegally sub-let a...
Tag this Judgment!The President, Indian Languages Newspapers Association Vs. the Registr ...
Court: Delhi
1. The order dated 9th July 2007 issued by the Registrar of Newspapers for India (RNI) has been challenged by the Indian Languages Newspapers Association as being ultra vires the provisions of Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 (PRB Act). The impugned order, inter alia mandates audit of the circulation data of newspapers by private external auditors. 2. The relevant portion of the impugned order dated 9th July 2007 issued by the RNI reads as under: "1. Objective of AuditThe Registrar of Newspapers for India (RNI) receives circulation data from the publications in the prescribed annual returns which is filed by the publishers on periodical basis. The said circulation data is used by various Government departments, for example by DAVP for allotment of government advertisements by RNI for allotment of quota for purchase/import of newsprint etc. These returns/reports are to be certified by the auditors/chartered accountants of publisher.RNI now intends to carry out the sample verifi...
Tag this Judgment!Bsnl and ors Vs. Moda Nand Thakur
Court: Delhi
1. Appointed as a Junior Engineer in the Post and Telegraph Department under the Government of India, which post was later on re-designated as Junior Telecom Officer (JTO) petitioner earned regular promotion to the post of Sub- Divisional Engineer (SDE) on 15.7.1991 and with the formation of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) petitioner opted for and became the employee of BSNL.2. Seniority list of employees of BSNL is admittedly maintained on All India Seniority basis and promotions are effected to the next higher post as per applicable benchmark being achieved and thereupon by way of seniority. However, if short term vacancies such as leave vacancies etc. arise, the senior most person in a division is granted a short term promotion called promotion on Local Officiating basis.3. On 21.9.2004 an office order was issued promoting respondent on Local Officiating basis to the next higher post i.e. the post of 'STS'. It was indicated that the term of Local Officiating Promotion was 180 da...
Tag this Judgment!Kalu Singh and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
1. On 12th May, 1996 at about 2.30 p.m. an information was received at P.S. Tilak Nagar that two thieves have been apprehended near 20-Block Gurdwara, Tilak Nagar, and police be sent. SI S.S.Yadav reached the spot along with Constable Rajender and found many people, present there. Sardool CRL.APP.174/2001 Page 1 of 9 Singh, the complainant had caught hold of the Appellant as well as one Mahinder @ Machhu with the public present at the spot and Sardar Saran Singh father of complainant was lying in an unconscious condition nearby. Accused Mahinder @ Machhu was having a gold kara in his hand. SI S.S.Yadav recorded the statement of the complainant who stated that at about 2.50 p.m. he came to the spot where he found his father Sardar Saran Singh in an unconscious condition. Two boys Kalu Singh s/o Pyara Singh and Mahinder @ Machhu were removing a gold kara from the right hand of his father. Kalu Singh removed the kara and handed the same to Mahinder Singh. Both of them ran away on which he...
Tag this Judgment!Jagdish Prasad Vs. Dda and ors.
Court: Delhi
1. A seniority list of Assistant Engineers under DDA which was finalized on 21.8.1996 was unsettled by DDA after 13 years and 2 months, when on 20.10.2009 a revised seniority list was issued and as per which Harendra Pal Singh lost out on seniority and was immediately affected on account of Jagdish Prasad, who was shown junior to him in the seniority list dated 21.8.1996 was shown as senior to Harendra Pal Singh. Needless to state, Harendra Pal Singh approached the Central Administrative Tribunal and obtained a verdict favourable to him. The Tribunal has held that by 20.10.2009 it was too late in the day to revise the seniority list of Assistant Engineers which was settled on 21.8.1996.2. The decision dated 2.2.2010 passed by the Tribunal in favour of Harendra Pal Singh has been challenged by DDA as also by Jagdish Prasad who have filed the above captioned writ petitions.3. It is the case of the petitioners that notwithstanding 13 years and 2 months passing by since the seniority list ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Vivek Transporters (Ex- Serviceman) Private Limited Vs.
Court: Delhi
1. This petition under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act, for short) has been filed by the Official Liquidator for voluntary winding up of M/s Vivek Transporters (Ex-Serviceman) Private Limited (company, for short).2. The company was incorporated on 23rd January, 1989. The authorized share capital of the company is Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 5000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each. The paid up share capital is Rs.3,00,000/- divided into 3000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each. The registered office of the company is situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and is located at A5/1, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi- 110051. The Official Liquidator in this petition has set out the main, incidental or ancillary objects of the company. Details of the promoter directors and subscribers of the company have been stated. The list of Directors along with their present addresses have been mentioned.3. It is stated in paragraph 6 of the petition that there are only two shareholders of th...
Tag this Judgment!Abhishekh Goel Vs. Ministry of Human Resources Development and anr.
Court: Delhi
1. The petitioner appeared in the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) held on 11th April 2010 for admission to various Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and in the result declared thereof, secured the All Indian Rank of 3946. Though the petitioner has secured admission but has filed the present petition seeking direction to the respondent no.2 IIT to re-assess the marks of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that though his answers did not tally with the Answer Key prepared by the respondent no.2 IIT but his answers were correct and found correct by several expert teachers consulted by the petitioner. The petition thus points out errors in the Answer Key prepared by the respondent no.2 IIT. The petition also points out errors in the multiple choice given in the question paper. The contention of the petitioner is that if his answer sheet is so re-assessed, and his answers found to be correct and those given in the Answer Key incorrect or vague, the rank secured by the pet...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Ashwini Kr. Chopra Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
1.Calling in question the legal substantiality of the order dated 9th March, 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in the present intra-Court appeal has been preferred.2. The appellant / petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to the respondents to withdraw the notices/orders passed by them downgrading his security cover from Z+ to Z and cancellation of the allotment of government accommodation at 34, Lodhi Estate, New Delhi. The facts which were put forth before the writ court are that appellants father and grandfather were slain at the hands of Punjab extremists for their bold editorial policy against terrorism and LPA) No.293/2010 Page 1 of 14 extremism. That apart, the grandfather of the appellant was a veteran freedom fighter who founded a newspaper publication company, namely, The Hind Samachar Limited, which immensely contributed towards the fr...
Tag this Judgment!