Delhi Court July 2000 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2000 Page 28 of about 277 results (0.020 seconds)Union Bank of India Vs. M/S. Indian Project Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)480
ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is a suit on behalf of the plaintiff-Bank under Order xxxvII CPC, seeking recovery of Rs.2,52,166.20/- along with pendente lite interest. 2. The suit arises from a claim by the plaintiff-Bank payable by the defendants for providing Packing Credit Account facility of Rs. 1 lacs on 26.5.1981 and the after from time to time when the defendants operated the account and the cause of action arose in favor of the plaintiff on the failure of the defendants to clear the account. The cause of action further arose on 25th June, 1983 when the plaintiff remitted the Bank Guarantee amount to Dacca and on 10.2.83, 12.1.83, 10.1.84 and on 14.12.85 when the defendants admitted the claim of the plaintiff-bank and failed to honour their commitment of repayment. 3. The defendants 1,3 & 4 had not put in their appearance despite service. Accordingly, an ex-parte decree for Rs.2,52,166.20 with costs Along with interest was passed on 28th April, 1989 in favor of the plaintiff and ...
Tag this Judgment!P.M. Diesels Ltd. Vs. M/S. Thukral Mechanical Works and Another
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)482; AIR1988Delhi282a; 2000(3)ARBLR108(Delhi); 86(2000)DLT579
ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an application on behalf of the respondents under Order XIII, Rule 2 CPC, praying for bringing on record the additional documents which was filed by list of documents dated 27.2.95. 2. The petition is filed by the petitioner/non-applicant against respondent No. 1 under Sections 46, 56 and 107 of Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 for rectification of entry relating to the Registered Trade Mark by the respondent No. 1/Thukral Mechanical Works. 3. The petitioner's case is that they have registered trademarks for Diesel oil Engines and parts, Centrifugal Pumps, Agricultural Pumps, Electric Motors, Pumping Sets and parts thereof. They have been using since 1963 the trademark FIELD MARSHAL for the aforesaid goods and the said trademark is registered. The trademark which is sought to be rectified and registered in favor of the respondents is the trademark FIELD MARSHAL in respect of the Flour Mills, Circulation and centrifugal pumps etc. 4. The current stage ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi (Central) Vs. Bharat Commerce and In ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)515; 86(2000)DLT581; [2000]245ITR700(Delhi)
ORDERArijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. Accepting prayer for reference made by the Revenue by applications under Section 2561(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench-E ('the Tribunal' for short) has referred the following questions, pertaining to assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75, for opinion of this Court: '1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in including the dividends of Rs.7,37,028/- and Rs. 27,27,790/- declared by the assessed company in respect of the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 respectively in the capital base on the fist day in respect of the respective accounting periods relevant to the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 for the purpose of computing the chargeable profits under the Companies (profits) Sur-tax Act, 1964? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in confirming the direction given by the Appellate Assis...
Tag this Judgment!K.K. Bhardwaj Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2001CriLJ570; 86(2000)DLT784; 2000(54)DRJ807
ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. Mr. K.K. Bhardwaj, the petitioner herein was working as Inspector (Vigilance) in Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (in short DESU). During the year 1982 one D.K. Sharma, Assistant Engineer, DESU was working in Zone 312, Saket, Malviya Nagar, District Nehru Place, New Delhi. It is alleged that the said Mr. Sharma entered into a criminal conspiracy with Mr. S.C. Yadav, Inspector and Mr. Abdul Wahab, Lineman and the present petitioner. Mr. D.K. Sharma authorised S.C. Yadav to draw 1002 MTLT PVT Tropedi Cable from DESU Store, Lawrence Road which docket was duly signed by D.K. Sharma for the maintenance of Sheikh Sarai Phase-II. Mr. S.C. Yadav Along with Mr. Abdul Wahab drew the said material on 30th November, 1982. Material was taken out in truck No. DHG-3272. The said truck was owned by Shri Sukhdev Singh. He was also the Driver of the said truck. The loaded truck was given to Shri Gulab Chand Jain and Shri Jawahar Lal at the instructions of the present petitioner, M...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Prem Lata Bajpai
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)224; 86(2000)DLT559; 2000(56)DRJ564
Arijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. Heard.At the instance of Revenue, under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench-B (for short the Tribunal) has referred following question for opinion of this Court:'Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was correct in deleting the penalty of Rs. 10,000/- levied by the IAC under Section271(1)(c)?'2. Factual position in a nutshell is as follows :For the assessment year 1973-74, assessed filed its return of income on 16th August, 1973 disclosing income of Rs. 19,887/-. By a revised return, filed on 29th September, 1976 it was shown at Rs. 47,834/- which included Rs. 10,000/- on account of shares allotted otherwise than for cash in Doburg Lager Breweries Private Limited. Assessing Officer treated the sum of Rs. 10,000/- as income from undisclosed sources and initiated penalty proceedings. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (IAC for short) levied penalty of Rs. ...
Tag this Judgment!Chaman Lal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Reported in: [2000]112TAXMAN291(Delhi)
Pasayat, C.J.This is an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). For the assessment year 1980-81, certain additions were made by the assessing officer for unexplained cash found during search in the petitioner's premises and unexplained expenditure the matter was taken in appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). Relief was granted on several heads by the said authority. Matter was carried by the revenue before the Tribunal, Delhi. Cross-objections were also filed by the assessee-petitioner.2. The Tribunal upheld the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals), so far as the relief granted for a sum of Rs. 56,000 in respect of cash found at the time of search is concerned. So far as his claim regarding loans from seven parties is concerned, the Tribunal found that positive materials were not produced before the Commissioner (Appeals) and, thereforee, it was not possible on its part to record any definite finding. thereforee, the ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt. Prem Lata Bajpai
Court: Delhi
Reported in: (2000)162CTR(Del)85
Arijit Pasayat, C. J.Heard.At the instance of revenue, under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench-B (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') has referred following question for opinion of this court :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was correct in deleting the penalty of Rs. 10,000 levied by the IAC under section 271(1)(c)?'2. Factual position in a nutshell is as follows : For the assessment year 1973-74, assessed filed its return of income on 16-8-1973, disclosing income of Rs. 19,887. By a revised return, filed on 29-9-1976, it was shown at Rs. 47,834 which included Rs. 10,000 on account of shares allotted otherwise than for cash in Doburg Lager Breweries (P) Ltd. The assessing officer treated the sum of Rs. 10,000 as income from undisclosed sources and initiated penalty proceedings. The Inspecting Assessing Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as th...
Tag this Judgment!