Delhi Court January 2000 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2000 Page 8 of about 209 results (0.021 seconds)R.K. Mina Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)242; 2000(52)DRJ814
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner, who is working as Chief Engineer (Civil) in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, has filed the writ petition seeking for the regularisation of his appointments in the grades of EE(C), SE(C) and CE(C) from due dates when, according to him, he should have been regularly ap-pointed, and for consequential benefits. 2. A few facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition, to be noticed, are thus: 3. In July, 1976, the MCD issued an advertisement in the Press for the purpose of filling up the posts reserved for SC/ST categories as A.E.(C). The petitioner applied and in the selection held, he was selected. On the 21st of May, 1977, the petitioner joined MCD as A.E.(C). On the 27th of May, 1982, the petitioner was promoted as E.E.(C) w.e.f. 31.5.1982 and this was on ad hoc basis. 4. On the 17th of October, 1984, the MCD issued a circular with reference to the confirmation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes of all categories. The circula...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar Mishra and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000IIAD(Delhi)283; 84(2000)DLT28; 2000(52)DRJ668
ORDERA.K. Sikri, J. 1. Although this writ petition was filed raising various points, after the filing of the counter affidavit controversy boils down to one point only on which the arguments were addressed. 2. The petition is filed by two petitioners both of whom had applied for the appointment to the post of primary teacher/nursery teacher/assistant teacher in MCD, NDMC and Directorate of Education, Government of Delhi pursuant to an advertisement issued by Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (hereinafter called DSSSB) on 11.6.1998. They claim that they were eligible in every respect for being appointed to the post of teacher applied for. The Board thereafter issued another advertisement dated 21-22/9/1998 indicating the method by which the score of every candidate was to be computed giving certain weightage to various degrees possessed by a candidate. In the same advertisement DSSSB had also indicated cut of score below which the candidates would not be considered for appointme...
Tag this Judgment!Kishan Singh (Ex. Sepoy) Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)304
ORDERC.M. Nayar, J.1. This matter relates to the grant of pension under the Special Pension Scheme for the ex-army personnel who revolted against the British Authorities. A copy of the said Scheme is filed as Annexure-A to the writ petition.2. The petitioner was stated to be enrolled under the British Army on 12th May, 1942 and it is stated that he along with other Indian personnel revolted against the British Army at Egypt and the petitioner was stated to be imprisoned along with others as a consequence thereto. 3. Reading of the petition also indicates that the petitioner had contended that he was court marshalled both in Egypt and Italy. 4. Respondent No. 2 has filed counter affidavit wherein it is stated in paragraph 9 as follows :- '9. That with reference to the averments made in para 10 of the writ petition, this respondent humbly submits that, on receipt of various representations from the petitioner in October, 1994 the same were examined and a report from the Government of NCT...
Tag this Judgment!K.L.S. Bhagat Vs. State and Others
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)449; 84(2000)DLT270; 2000(53)DRJ81
ORDERVijender Jain, J.1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional Sr. Sub Judge, Delhi, the appellant has filed the present appeal. 2. The appellant applied for Succession Certificate in respect of debts and security of her sister Mrs. Kawal Deep who died in Bangkok on 17th September, 1991. It was stated in the application for grant of Succession Certificate that she was an ordinary resident of Anupam Apartments, Arjun Nagar, Delhi. Along with the application, schedule of properties was also annexed which, inter alia, mentioned the property in Bangkok and deposit of Rs. 600/- in Punjab National Bank at Delhi. The trial Court came to the conclusion in view of the fact that the only address in the Pass Book is of Delhi and there is only one entry in the bank account and in view of the fact that deceased was employed in Bangkok, the Court did not have the jurisdiction to grant Succession Certificate under Part 10 of the Indian Succession Act. 3. Mr. Bhuchar, learned counsel for the...
Tag this Judgment!Shafiq-ur-rehman Kidwal Vs. Registrar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2000(56)DRJ466
Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the respondent No. 1 under Section 32 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act appointing Sh. J.P.S. Kataria, Assistant Registrar with the direction to hold the elections. The said order was upheld by the Appellate Authority, namely, the Financial Commissioner, which is also under challenge in this writ petition.2. This Court issued notice on the writ petition. I am informed by the Counsel appearing for the parties that this Court by order dated 10th March, 1999 stayed the operation of the impugned order dated 13th January, 1999 and, thereforee, the Election Officer could not proceed with and comply with the directions issued in the impugned . order. During the pendency of the present writ petition in this Court, the petitioner and respondent No. 3, who represent parallel Executive Committees, settled all the disputes in between themselves and held an election for the office bear...
Tag this Judgment!India Seed House Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Reported in: (2001)69TTJ(Del)241
ORDERV. Dongzathang, Senior V.P. : July, 1998This appeal of the assessed is relevant for the block period 1-4-1986, to 20-7-1996. The assessed is a firm engaged in the business of trading in seeds of different varieties. Export to some neighbouring countries are also made. The firm consists of two partners, namely, Shri Purshottam Das Saini and his mother Smt. Punno Devi sharing 50 per cent each. A search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted at the premises of the assessed on 20-7-1996. The assessed filed return of income under section 158BC on 27-6- 1997, declaring a total undisclosed income of Rs. 5 lakh for the block period.2. The assessing officer found that several documents and books were seized at the time of operation under section 132 of the Act. These documents and books contained various transactions of unaccounted nature for the period. The assessing officer examined these details and recorded his findings as below :Annexure A-5 : This is an exercise book w...
Tag this Judgment!Pig Iron Mfrs. Asscn. Vs. Designated Authority, Min. of
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2000)(116)ELT67TriDel
1. These Appeals are directed against the Final Findings dated 27-8-1998 and Corrigendum dated 2-9-1998 or the Designated Authority (DA for short) with regard to imposition of Anti-dumping duty on Metallurgical Coke (Met Coke for short) from the People's Republic of China (PR for short). In the Order dated 27th August, 1998 the DA gave the following findings. Irrespective of the fact that the members of ICA can produce metcoke with less than 15% ash content, the Authority is inclined to agree with the exporters/importers that only metcoke with ash content of 15% and below is a like article to the metcoke imported from China RP. Based on the information available with the Authority at the time of initiation, the petitioner had the standing to file the petition on behalf of the domestic industry. The petitioner satisfied the criterion for standing at the time of preliminary findings, considering the scope of the "like article", as defined in the preliminary findings. Petitioner now has ...
Tag this Judgment!Punjab Castings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT761TriDel
1. The present appeal has been filed by M/s. Punjab Castings Pvt. Ltd. against the communication dated 30-7-99 issued by the Superintendent (T), Central Excise, Divn. Jalandhar. The letter addressed by the Superintendent (Tech.) is extracted below :- "Sub.:- C.E.-Request for discharging duty liability on non-alloy steel ingots on actual production. Please refer your request application dated 31-3-99 on the subject cited above. In this context, I am directed to inform you that your request dated 31-3-99 regarding discharging of duty liability has been examined at Hrs. Office, Chandigarh. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has desired in judgment No. 53/63/98 dated 21-4-98 that it will be open to the manufacturer to file application on the basis of actual production and the same shall be duly considered in accordance with Rules. Since you have opted to discharge duty liability under Rule 96ZO (3) on total furnace capacity of 3 Metric Tonnes installed in your factory, the benefit available under ...
Tag this Judgment!Golden Laminates Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2001)(97)LC167Tri(Delhi)
1. By the impugned order, the Commissioner of Central Excise has confirmed a duty demand of Rs. 55,14,713/-on paper based decorative laminated sheets manufactured by the appellants herein (classified under CET Sub-heading 4823.90), denying the benefit of Notification 135/89-CE dated 12.5.1989 to the product in dispute, on the ground that it is impregnated with plastics and, therefore, excluded from the coverage under the Notification, as held by the Tribunal in the case of Viral Laminates . He has also imposed a penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs on the appellants. The period of demand is 1.4.1993 to 28.2.1994 and the show cause notice raising the duty demand and proposing imposition of penalty is dated 20.2.1998.2. The appellants who are represented by their Counsel, Shri G. Shiv Dass, do not contest the issue on merits, in view of the Tribunal's decision supra but only challenge the application of the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, 19...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Shreyans Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT177TriDel
1. This Reference Application has been filed by the Department claiming that a question of law has arisen out of Final Order No. A/734/98-NB, dated 16-3-1998.2. The Respondents in this application, engaged in the manufacture of writing and printing paper falling under Chapter 48 of the Central Excise Tariff and availing the facility of Modvat credit on inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, had taken credit of the duty paid on wire mesh and felts used as inputs in the manufacture of their final products. The jurisdictional Additional Commissioner of Central Excise disallowed the credit so taken, on the ground that the said items, viz. wire mesh and felts could not be considered to be inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final products under Rule 57A ibid. The adjudicating authority took the view that the said goods were used as parts of the machinery of the paper manufacturers. The order of adjudication of the Additional Commissioner was set aside by the...
Tag this Judgment!