Delhi Court November 1995 Judgments

Harjinder Kaljr and ors. Vs. Usha Gupta and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 61(1996)DLT102

N.G. Nandi, J.(1) A suit being Suit No. 294/74 for specific performance for an agreement to sell, came to be filed by Seth Narain Singh and others against Smt. Usha Gupta and another in respect of property bearing No. 28 situate at khewat No. 1 Khatauni N 1392 Khasra No. 2022/1558 measuring 1583 sq. yards - 1402 sq. meters approximately situate on Pusa Road, Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'property'). It is suggested that the suit came to be decreed on 19th May, 1978 and the Execution Proceedings No. 90 of 1978 for the execution of the said decree. It is also suggested that the plaintiff (decree-holder L.R.of deceased Narain Singh) pursuant to the decree deposited the consideration amount for getting the sale deed in her favor. At that stage, the Tax Recovery Officer, Mayur Bhawan, New Delhi vide their letter No. Troxx, New Delhi dated 17.6.1988, addressed to the Registrar, Delhi High Court, New Delhi preferred a claim to the sale proceeds amount...

Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. D.R. ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1996IAD(Delhi)229; 61(1996)DLT837; (1996)113PLR13

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) is 7540/95 is for injunction directing the defendant to restore the electric, water and telephone facilities in the premises bearing No. 4-A, Khan Market, New Delhi, and restraining the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff-corporation from the premises. (2) In the plaint the plaintiff prays for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the premises. The case of the plaintiff in the plaint is that the plaintiff-corporation wanted a Commercial premises for running its Indian manufacturing foreign liquor shop. 'Die defendant offered a shop 4-A, Khan Market, New Delhi. There was a license agreement but in fact it is a lease agreement creating a tenancy in favor of the plaintiff. It was agreed that the plaintiff would pay a monthly rent compensation at 9.90% of the gross profit from the sale of the liquor up to 31.3.1983. The license granted according to the plaintiff was 5.5.1982 and after sometime the plaintiff (Corpor...

Raj Kumar Sareen Vs. Skipper Towers (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

A.P. Chowdhri, President: 1. This order would dispose of two applications made by Prabhjot Singh, respondent No. 3. The first application is undated but bears verification dated 1.8.95 and the second application, which is more comprehensive, is dated 28.9.95. 2. The facts giving rise to these applications are that in complaint filed by Raj Kumar Sareen, bearing number as C-302/93 an ex-parte final order was passed by this Commission on 4.5.94 directing the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs. 8,64,000/- with interest @15% p.a. from the date of filing the complaint till the date of payment. Arrayed as opposite parties in the aforesaid complaint were (1) M/s. Skipper Tower (P) Ltd., (2) Tejwant Singh, Managing Director, (3) Prabhjot Singh, Director. It appears that a written statement was filed, on behalf of the aforesaid opposite party-3 Prabhjot Singh to the effect that he had resigned as a Director and was not liable to pay the amount. Notwithstanding the above objection, however, thi...