Delhi Court October 1994 Judgments

Jaina Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Krishna Gupta

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

R.N. Mittal, President: 1. This application has been filed by the appellant for setting aside the order of the Commission dated 19th May, 1994 and re-hearing of the appeal. 2. It is stated in the application that the case was listed for arguments on 19th May, 1994 but the Counsel of the appellant was out of station and this fact was brought to the notice of the Commission by Shri Kaushil Nehra, the representative of the appellant. However, inspite of his request that the appeal be adjourned, it was heard and decided on that date. Consequently, it is prayed that the order dated 19th May, 1994 be set-aside and the matter be decided afresh. 3. We have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant but regret our inability to accept his arguments. He has referred to the decision of the National Commission in Indian Banks Association v. Archana Kamath and Others. (Revision Petition No. 453 of 1993) decided on 19th May, 1994, wherein it was observed that the Consumer Forums would bear in mind t...

Narinder Nath Vs. Mahinder Nath

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1994IVAD(Delhi)795; 1994(31)DRJ455

R.C. Lahoti, J.(1) This order disposes of four IAs. (2) The facts in brief, in so far as relevant for the disposal of these applications may be noticed. M/S Kedar Nath Mohinder Nath was a partnership firm. There were five partners. The plaintiff and the defendants 1,2 and 3 real brothers held 15% share each. Their mother Smt Krishna Pyari was also a partner holding 40% share. (3) The plaintiff has filed this suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts on 18.11.1993. The mother was not joined as a party to the suit. The defendants on being noticed, have on 11.11.93 filed on I.A.No-249/94 under Order 7 Rule Ii Civil Procedure Code seeking rejection of the plaint alleging the suit to be barred by law inasmuch as the mother, a necessary party was not joined in the suit. Faced with this application, the plaintiff became wiser and on 1.3.94, moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10 Cpc (I.A.N0.2271/94) for impleading the mother as a party to the suit. However, before the ...

Shiv NaraIn Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1994IVAD(Delhi)524; 1994(31)DRJ268

Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) The appellant has filed the present appeal against the judgment and order dated 3rd February, 1992 passed by Mr. J.M. Malik, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. The appellant has been convicted under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and a fine of Rs.1 lakh has been imposed and in default of payment of fine, the appellant has to further serve simple imprisonment for six months. (2) The brief facts necessary to dispose of this appeal are as follows:- (3) Mohinder Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station Town Hall received a secret information from the informer that the appellant was carrying some narcotic drugs at 3.15 p.m. on 12th July, 1990. He brought the information to the knowledge of the Station House Officer of Town Hall Police Station. (4) Mr. Mohinder Singh, Sub Inspector left the police station along with Constable Ved Prakash. Dharam Singh, Co...