Delhi Court August 1985 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 1985 Page 7 of about 75 results (0.017 seconds)Delhi Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Kanta Jolly and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2(1986)ACC191
S.B. Wad, J.1. FAO 58/74 is filed by the DTC against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal granting Rs. 79,150/- towards compensation for the death of Mr. Kulbhushan Jolly caused by bus No. DLP 657, belonging to the D.T.C. in a road accident. FAO. 111/74 is filed by the claimants for the enhancement of compensation.2. The accident took place on 13-2-66 on the Mehrauli Road, at Point 'T', on the crossing towards Jorbagh.3. The claimants stated that the deceased was returning home after seeing his relative at Kalka Colony, New Delhi on his scooter. When he reached Point 'T' at the crossing, coming from Jorbagh, bus No. DLP 657 came from Mehrauli Road in great speed and struck the scooter. The deceased was admitted to the Safdarjung Hospital, where he died on 18-2-66 of the injuries. PW/1, Dr. M.K Guha has testified that the death was due to the accident. Apart from this evidence, the petitioners have examined Sewa Singh PW/3, Ramesh Chand, PW/4; Des Raj PW/5 and Shri S.P. Wate...
Tag this Judgment!Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors. Vs. Suman Chopra
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 1(1986)ACC97
S.B. Wad, J.1. This is an appeal filed by MCD against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 14-11-73 in which the tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 15,750/- as compensation to respondent Suman Chopra. Cross objections are filed by the respondent claiming that the compensation should be raised to Rs. 50,000/-.2. The accident took place on 5-3-70 near the traffic point, Industrial Area, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi. The respondent was a college student and for going to the college she was proceeding towards Shadipur Bus Depot to get the bus. When she was on the left side of the road on a kutcha footpath a refuge truck No. DLL 3128 belonging to the MCD came from behind and took a sudden turn, knocking the respondent. Her right foot was crushed by the left front wheel of the truck. She remained in hospital 5-3-70 to 10-4-70. Two fingers of her toe, viz. 4th and 5th were required to be amputated because of gangrene. The other bones of the right foot were also dislocated. She has ...
Tag this Judgment!Bakelite Hylam Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1985)(5)LC2334Tri(Delhi)
1. The captioned appeal was initially filed before the Central Government as a revision application which, Under Section 35-P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, has come as transferred proceedings to this Tribunal for disposal as if it were an appeal filed before it.2. The issue falling for determination in the present appeal is the correct classification under the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (CET, for short) of rigid plastic laminated sheets and boards manufactured by the appellants under the trade names "Hylam" industrial laminates and "Hyglas" electrical grade sheets in various thicknesses, sizes and colours. The appellants claimed classification of the goods under the residual heading- item 68, CET-which was rejected by the lower authorities who classified them as "articles of plastics" under item 15A(2), CET.3. Item No. 15A, CET, as it stood at the material time, read as follows : "15A. Artificial or synthetic resins and plastic materials and ...
Tag this Judgment!Mentha and Allied Products Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1985)(5)LC1894Tri(Delhi)
1. As per the information supplied by the appellants a Mentha Oil Distillation Unit was established during the year 1972-73 under the sole proprietorship of Shri N.L. Nanda for manufacturing Mentha Oil from herb called Mentha Arvensis under the name and (style 'Mentha & Allied Products'. In the year 1974-75 this sole proprietorship business was converted into a partnership business with Shri N. L. Nanda and Shri Subhash Chandra as the partners. During the year 1975-7 6 with effect from 1.1.1976, three more partners were added to the said partnership business, namely, Shri Arvind. Kumar, Shri Anand Kumar and Shri Vijay Kumar Verma and a partnership deed was executed on 1.1.1976.This partnership continued upto 31st March, 1978 and on that date .Shri Subhash Chandra retired from the partnership business and a deed of dissolution dated 3rd April, 1978 was duly executed and thereafter a partnership deed was executed on 4th April, 1978 between the remaining four partners. In terms of th...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1987)(11)LC616Tri(Delhi)
1. In his order No. 12 of 1984, dated 29.6.1984, the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-I decided that MS specials manufactured by M/s.Indian Hume Pipe Co. Limited, Bombay were assessable under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under Item 26AA(iv) as claimed by the factory. He ordered payment of a sum of Rs. 901,086.13 as demand for the period 1.4.1976 to 1.4.1981 under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules read with Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.He confiscated some seized goods which he allowed redemption on a fine, and imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000/-on the factory under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.2. The manufacturers have appealed before this Tribunal to say that the Collector was mistaken in his order because there was no suppression or misstatement of facts to warrant recovery within the extended period of 5 years under Section 11 A. For the same reason there was no justification for the confiscation or for the penalty.3. It w...
Tag this Judgment!Collector of Central Excise Vs. Sundram Fasteners Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1985)(22)ELT923TriDel
1. This appeal is against the order dated 30-9-1982 of the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Madras, in which he has held that 32 items of "bolts, nuts and screws" manufactured by the respondents were classifiable under Central Excise Tariff Item 68. In doing so, he reversed the decision of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras VI Division, who had held the articles to be classifiable under T.I. 52.2. The 32 articles in question are distinguished by part numbers as well as descriptions. Most of them are described as "con rod bolts" (short for "connecting rod bolts"), or as "bolts". Two of them are described as "bolt rear wheel" and "bolt front wheel". However, the arguments before the lower authorities and before us were on the basis that all the articles could generally be described as "connecting rod bolts".3. It is seen from the orders of the lower authorities that the respondents were paying duty on all these items as bolts, nuts and screws, falling under T.I. 52....
Tag this Judgment!Wealth-tax Officer Vs. Seth Sudhir Kumar Modi
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Reported in: (1985)14ITD194(Delhi)
1. These three departmental appeals related to three different assessees, Seth Sudhir Kumar Modi, Seth Mahesh Kumar Modi and Seth Manmohan Modi and they all relate to their wealth-tax assessments for the assessment year 1975-76. These three persons were partners in the firm Synfibre Sales Corporation. This firm was having some shares of Indofil Chemicals Ltd. While valuing the interest of the partners in the firm Synfibre Sales Corporation, the WTO following his order for the assessment year 1973-74 valued the shares in Indofil Chemicals Ltd. under Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 ('the Rules') as against the value shown in the balance sheet at cost. The WTO, thus made an adjustment to the net wealth of the firm and ascertained the partners' interest in the partnership on the above basis. The working of the value of partners' interest in the firm is given in Annexure 'B' to the assessment orders in the case of the above three assessees.2. In the first appeal before the AAC, the a...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Parkash Bhatnagar Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 28(1985)DLT357
Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J.(1) This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence recorded by an Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi against the appellant under section 302 Indian Penal Code sentencing him to imprisonment for life. (2) The appellant was sent up for trial for having committed the murder of his wife, Laxmi by manual strangulation. The motive for murder is the suspected infidelity. The incident is dated the night intervening 19/20th February 1981 and the place of incident is a room in premises No. 142-A Jagatpuri, New Shahdara, Delhi. The appellant along with his wife had shifted to that place about a week earlier to the date of incident. This premises is a two roomed tenement and one of the rooms on the date of incident was in the occupation of one Khem Chand Public Witness 2 who was residing in it along with his wife and children. Fir came to be registered at 11.30 a.m. on 20-2-1982 in pursuance of a statement of Khem Chand Public Witness 2 recorded by Shoban Singh S.I. P...
Tag this Judgment!Budh Singh (Now in Tihar Jail), Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 29(1986)DLT70
J.D. Jain, J.1. All the four appellants mentioned above have been convicted of offence under Section 392 read with Section 397, Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') by an Additional Sessions Judge vide his judgment dated 30th October 1984. They have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs. 300/- each for offence under Section 392 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for seven years under Section 397 IPC ; in default of payment of fine, they have been awarded further rigorous imprisonment for six months each. Besides that, the appellants-Bishan Sarup, Budh Singh and Sher Singh have been convicted of offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs. 100/- ; in default of payment of fine, they have been awarded further rigorous imprisonment fore one month. However, all the sentences have been directed to run concurrently. Feeling aggrieved they have filed separate appeals, as stated above, against thei...
Tag this Judgment!Harbans Lal and ors. Vs. Saroj Khanna and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2(1985)ACC482
S.B. Wad, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the insurance company respondent No. 3 against the award of the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal dated 3-6-1975. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 31,460/- as compensation. The claimants have filed the cross-objections claiming Rs. 1,50,000/-as compensation.2. The accident took place on 21-7-1971 at about 4.00 p.m. on Curzon Road near Scindia House, Connaught Place, New Delhi. Devendra Kumar Khanna was going on his cycle along Curzon Road from the side of Baroda House towards Connaught Place, New Delhi. Bus No. DLP 4817 under DTC operation came with a great speed from behind and knocked down the cyclist. He was taken to Willingdon Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries on 27-7-1971. Dr. Bharat Singh PW 5 who conducted the post mortem of the deceased found the following injuries on his person:(1) Diffused swelling over whole of the right thing including knee joint with abrasions on the outer and front part in an area of 8' to 10'.(2) ...
Tag this Judgment!