Delhi Court January 1985 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 1985 Page 10 of about 93 results (0.016 seconds)Sampati Devi Vs. Ram Pershad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-02-1985
Reported in: 27(1985)DLT390
N.N. Goswamy, J.(1) This second appeal by the appellant-landlady is directed against the order dated November 1, 1973 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi whereby the Tribunal held that the respondent was a tenant in the premises in dispute and remanded the case to the Rent Controller for fixation of standard rent. (2) The respondent filed a petition for fixation of standard rent. He alleged in the petition that he was a tenant in the premises in dispute and the premises as described are under the stair case whose area is given to be 4 sq. yds. with an open platform in front measuring another 4 sq. yds. (3) It was alleged that the respondent took the said premises on rent w.e.f. 1-1-1967 from the appellant under an oral agreement of tenancy on a monthly rental of Rs. 60.00 . According to the respondent the rent was excessive and as such he pleaded that a fair rent should be fixed for the premises in dispute. (4) This petition was contested by the appellant-landlady. As a prelimin...
Tag this Judgment!Standard Fireworks Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1985
Reported in: (1985)(21)ELT200TriDel
1. These two appeals were heard together by consent of both sides since the question for decision is the same in both appeals, involving common questions of fact and law.2. Both appellants are manufacturers of fireworks. They filed refund claims on the 'basis' that 'they are exempt from payment .of duty under Notification No. 179/77, dated 18-6-1977, the goods manufactured by them being covered by Tariff Item No. 68 and in relation to the manufacture of which no process was ordinarily carried on with the aid of power. The refund claim by M/s. Standard Fireworks Industries related to the period 13-7-1977 to 10-11-1978 and that of M/s.Rajaratnam Fireworks related to the period 12-7-1977 to 9-11-1978. The refund claims were rejected by the Assistant Collector and the rejection was upheld by the Appellate Collector, Madras. It is the revision petitions filed against the said orders by the two appellants to the Government of India that, on transfer, are being dealt with and disposed of as ...
Tag this Judgment!Basant Export Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-1985
Reported in: (1989)(43)ELT65TriDel
1. The present appeal is preferred against the order of the Collector of Customs, Cochin, dated 18-11-1983. By the above order the Collector ordered confiscation of the imported goods under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3(2) of the Import & Export (Control) Act, 1947, as amended. The appellant importer was given an option to redeem goods on payment of a fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- within three months. A personal penalty of Rs. 75,000/- was also imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.2. The appellants imported 2,000 pieces of 250 watts high Pressure Sodium Vapour Lamps from Hong Kong. They filed the Bill of Entry No.683 dated 29-7-1983. They declared the value of the imported goods at Rs. 1,82,741-12. The appellants sought clearance of the goods under OGL in terms of Appendix-10 of AM - 84 Policy Book. Part III of List-8 reads: "All other items permitted under OGL in terms of the Import Policy in force, other than those covered by Appendices I ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›