Delhi Court November 1968 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 1968 Page 3 of about 24 results (0.017 seconds)Basant Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT599
S.K. Kapur, J.(1) In the year 1961 the petitioner was employed as an Upper Division Clerk (Cashier) in the Directorate of Inspection (Research, Statistics and Publication), Government of Indian New Delhi. In July 1961 the office of the Statistician disposed of waste paper by inviting tenders. It was sold to two tenderers, Nand Lal and Ram Dev, and the purchasers removed the same from the premises of the Statistician's office after weighment on 22nd July, 1961, 27the July,1961, and 28th July, 1961. It is alleged by the petitioner in paragraph 6 of the petition that on 27th July, 1961, the duty of supervising the weighment was assigned to J. N. Talwar and Ajit Singh, two of the clerks in the Statistician's office, and a statement of sale in the prescribed form was duly prepared according to the instructions. In paragraph 7 the petitioner says that J. N. Talwar had to go away for a short while in the course of weighment and requested the petitioner to be present at the site of weighment d...
Tag this Judgment!Bikram Singh and ors. Vs. G.D. Jhingan, Secretary, Delhi and East Punj ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: ILR1969Delhi1
D. Dua, J.(1) This is a plaintiffs' revision directed against the order of a learned Subordinate Judge 1st Class, Delhi, dated 9/8/1968 disallowing in part the amendment sought in the plaint.(2) In April, 1968, the suit out of which this revision arises was instituted by three plaintiffs against four defendants claiming a perpetual injunction to the effect that the defendants be restrained from 'interfering with the plaintiff working as President of Delhi and East Punjab Circle Telegraph Co-operative Thrift & Credit Society Ltd., New Delhi, and from holding the election of the general body for election of the Committee perpetually.' It appears that the plaintiffs had original thought of including in this plaint, a paragraph numbered as paragraph 8 which reads thus: 'THEREAFTER, defendant No. 1 who is the Secretary, made some misrepresentations to the Registrar of Co-operative Societies at which the Assistant Registrar Co-operative Societies held in abeyance his own letter dated 4/4/196...
Tag this Judgment!Baldev Raj Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT237
I.D. Dua, J.(1) The petitioner Baldev Raj, who was stated to be a boy of 20 years age by the Courts below, was con- victed on 14th; May, 1968 by a learned Magistrate 1st Class, Delhi, under section 324, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year. The Charge against him was that he had stabbed one Satish Chander on 20th July, 1967 at about 9.15A.M. when the injured person was going for a walk via T. B. Hospital Kingsway Camp along with Inderjit. Two injuries were given with the knife by the accused, one at the back of the neck and the toher somewhere on the left arm. The conviction was upheld by the learned Additional Sessions Judge but the sentence was reduced to rigorous imprisonment for six months. The order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge is dated 7th October, 1968 and it was directed that the accused, who was on bail, be taken in custody. (2) Btoh the Courts below considered the question of releasing the accused under the Probation of Offenders A...
Tag this Judgment!S. Thakar Singh and anr. Vs. Karriers Finance Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT329
T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This Civil Revision petition was filed by Thakar Singh and antoher against the order of Shri V. S. Aggarwal, Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Delhi, dated 23rd August, 1968, in an application under Order 26, Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure in suit No 82 of 1963, on his file. (2) The respondent herein (plaintiff), M/s. Karriers Finance, filed the above mentioned suit against the petitioners herein on 15th February, 1967. An ex parte decree was passed against the petitioners herein on 27th April, 1967. On an application by the petitioners (defendant), the ex porte decree was set aside on 21st December, 1967 on the condition of the petitioners (defendants) paying certain costs, and the suit was adjourned to 8th January, 1968 for the payment of the aforesaid costs. The costs were duly paid by the petitioners (defendants) and the petitioners filed theit written statement on 23rd January, 1968. Issues were framed on 24th February, 1968. The case was posted on 18th ...
Tag this Judgment!