Skip to content


Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Madras Court September 2011 Judgments Home Cases Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Madras 2011 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.014 seconds)

Sep 07 2011 (TRI)

S. Kuppusamy Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Director of Postal ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

R. SATAPATHY, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER This O.A. is filed under Sec.19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. The applicant is seeking the following reliefs; 1. To call for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his order which is made in memo No. SB/SBCO/SK/09-10 dated 03.06.2010 and the order of 1st respondent made in Memo No.VIG/15-07/10-11 dated 20.07.2010 confirming the order of the 2nd respondent dated 03.06.2010 and to set aside the same consequent to 2. Direct the respondents to refund the amount of recovery if any, to the applicant; and 3. To pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2. We have Mr. R. Malaichamy, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. R. Govindaraj, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the charge memo dated 08.04.2010 (Annex A/1) issued by the Superintendent of Post Offices, Dindigul division, (Respondent No.2) is not i...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2011 (TRI)

K.S. Venkateswarn and Others Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Comptroller a ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

(Hon’ble Mr. R. Satapathy, Administrative Member) The applicants have come before this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 for the following relief: “to call for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his order which is made in No.912-NGE(APP)24-2010 dated 5.8.2010 and the order of the 4th respondent which is made in Admn.II/SAS Exam/2010-11/37 dated 3/6.9.2010 and set aside the same; consequent to direct the respondents to declare the applicants deemed to have passed the SOG (Civil Audit) Examination of the year 2008 and thereby to extent all the service benefits such as promotion and arrears of pay and allowances to the applicants” 2. The facts of the case as stated by the applicants are that all of them are working as Senior Auditors and for promotion to the post of Section Officer, they have to appear for Section Officers Grade Examination (SOGE), now renamed as Sub-ordinate Audit/Accounts Service (SAS) Examination. When th...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //