Skip to content


Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Lucknow Court May 1999 Judgments Home Cases Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Lucknow 1999 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.039 seconds)

May 27 1999 (TRI)

Pradeep Chandra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow

1. By notification dated 31.12.97, the Central Government amended the Indian Police Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955 (In short I.P.S. (F.C.S.) Regulations. By this amendment schedule to I.P.S. (F.C.S.) Regulations under the heading "Uttar Pradesh" "item Numbers 3, 4, 5 and 6 and entries relating thereto have been substituted". Entry 5 is in respect of posts to be filled by promotion under Rule 8 of the Indian Police Service, (Recruitment Rules) 1954 and it has been enhanced from 100 to 120. This amendment is to take effect on 1st of January, 98. However, on 19th February 98, the impugned latter Annexure-1 was issued. By this, out of the 20 vacancies so given, 2 number of vacancies were released for utilising in respect of officers included in the current select list of 1997 of U.P. Cadre and the remaining vacancies were bifurcated; 6 for each year of select list of 1998, 1999 and 2000. The State Government, sent a letter on 7.3.98 to release all the remaining 18 ...

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 1999 (TRI)

A.K. Dass Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow

1. By this O.A., the applicant has claimed seniority on the post of L.D.C. w.e.f. 3.5.82, the date the applicant was appointed on the said post instead of 25.10.90 the date on which he was regularised.2. The applicant was initially appointed on a class IV post on 26.7.73.For filling up two posts of L.D.C. through Limited Departmental Examination against 10% quotaa notification was issued on 28.11.81.Both these posts were reserved. One was reserved for Scheduled Tribe and the other was reserved for Scheduled Caste. This notification, however, provided that in addition to these reserved vacancies, some more vacancies of L.D.C. will also be filled up from candidates who qualified in this test on purely ad hoc basis subject to their replacement on availability of candidates selected by Staff Selection Commission (in short S.S.C.). As a result of such selection a list of 12 qualified candidates was prepared and the applicant was placed at serial No. 10. The post of L.D.C. to be filled from...

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 1999 (TRI)

Bhawani Pher Pandey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow

1. The applicant B.P. Pandey who was Assistant Station Master, originally filed this O.A. for staying the disciplinary proceedings initiated in pursuance of the order dated 29.9.94 as contained in Annexure A-1 to the O.A. Subsequently, a relief for quashing the disciplinary proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 29.9.94 and for quashing the charge-sheet was substituted. When the O.A. was filed, following the decision of the Hon. Supreme Court in the case of Kusheshwar Dubey v. Bharat Coaking Coal Limited and Ors. (Judgment Today (1988) 4 S.C.C. 319), further departmental proceedings was stayed. An application for vacation of Interim order was moved by the respondents but the same remained pending. The learned Counsel for the parties however, agreed that the O.A. may be heard and disposed of on merit.2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties at great length.The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was Assistant Station Master at Gosainganj. A raid was conducte...

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 1999 (TRI)

G.P. Upadhyaya, I.A.S. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow

1. This O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has been filed with the following reliefs: (i) This Hon, Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the order dated 10.4.1999 passed by the opposite party No. 2 contained in Annexure No. 1. (ii) This Hon. Tribunal may be further pleased to direct the respondents not to give affect to the order dated 10.4.1999 passed by the opposite party No. 2 contained in Annexure-1 and prevent them to post any person as Manager (Operations). (iii) This Hon. Tribunal may be pleased to grant such other relief which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (iv) This Hon. Tribunal be pleased to allow this application with costs and special compensation.2. The impugned order Annexure-1 dated 10.4.99 was passed by opposite party No. 2, Executive Director (Personnel) Food Corporation of India (in Short F.C.I.) regarding posting of Manager (Operation) in Regional Office, Lucknow purely on temporary basis...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //