Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
1. By Hon'ble Mr. K. George Joseph, Administrative Member - Having common facts and issues, the above O.As were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The applicants are working in the Trivandrum Office of the Accountant General (AandE), Kerala. They were chargesheeted for participation in an illegal demonstration along with a group of around 40 persons on 30.04.2008, marching through the corridors of the office building of the Principal Accountant General (Audit) and the Accountant General (AandE), shouting slogans, disturbing the peace of the office and preventing free movement of officials and visitors in violation of clause 6(b) of CCS (RSA) Rules, 1993 and Rules 3(1)(iii) and 7 (ii) of CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964. The Deputy Accountant General (Admn.), Office of the Accountant General (AandE), Kerala, by his orders dated 18.12.2008 in O.A. Nos. 247/10, 266/10, 269/10, 634/10 and dated 28.02.08 in O.A. No. 268/10 and dated 19.12.08 in O.A. No. 668/10 impose...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
HON'BLE MR. K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER 1. This O.A. is filed mainly for a declaration that the applicant is entitled to be promoted as Helper before any of his juniors including the contesting respondents and all consequential benefits arising therefrom. 2. The applicant joined the services of Lakshadweep Administration on 21.12.1987 as Casual Labourer. He was granted temporary status with effect from 1993. He passed IV standard examination held in the year 1999-2000. As per final seniority list of casual labourers working in Fibre Factories under Industries Department as on 31.12.1995, the applicant's name appears at serial No. 18 and the names of contesting respondents are at serial Nos. 23, 24, 26 and 27. The 3rd respondent vide order F.No. 1/12/90-IND dated 31.10.2008 had promoted and appointed the respondents No. 5 to 8 as Helpers in the pay scale of Rs. 4440 plus DA, overlooking the applicant when he is qualified and available from the year 2000 onwards. Aggrieved, t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
HON'BLE MR. K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER 1. This O.A. has been filed by the applicant for the following reliefs : (i) Issue an order quashing and setting aside Annexure A-3. (ii)Issue an order declaring that the applicant is entitled to continue at Kozhikode in the light of Annexure A-2 transfer guidelines. (iii)Issue an order directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders on Annexure A-4 representation, and (iv)such other orders and directions as are deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The applicant is a Group-D official (Office Assistant) working in the office of the Passport Officer, Kozhikode. He is a physically handicapped person with a disability of over 40% On account of his orthopedic impairment, his movements are considerably restrained and he carries forward his daily chores with the help of his family. In the month of April, 2010, when he learnt that the 1st respondent was taking steps to transfer him, he had submitted a detailed represen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. The applicant has filed this Original Application for a declaration that he is entitled to revision of his increment dates and pay with consequential arrears from 1.1.96. 2. When the matter came up for admission, we have heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant Mr.M.P.Varkey. We have also heard Mr.P.Haridas, the counsel for the respondents. Relying on the rule position as contained in the Railway Board letter No.F(E)-II/2003/FOP/I/Misc dated 30.6.2008 (Annexure A-2), the counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is entitled for the pay fixation and other benefits as derived therefrom. 3. We have considered the contentions of the applicant in the light of the aforesaid document and for getting the benefit, the applicant has already filed Annexure A3 representation addressed to the 2nd respondent. 4. On considering all the contentions now raised by the counsel appearing for the applicant and on going t...
Tag this Judgment!