Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Cuttack
Reported in : (2005)(3)SLJ28CAT
1. Applicant named Gopinath Tripathy, a retired Telecom employee was charge-sheeted on 24.11.1993 under Rule-9 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 for contravention of the provisions of Rule 3(i)(ii) and (iii) of CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964. Ultimately, he faced with an order of punishment (under Annexure-1, dated 23.4.1996) by which 25% of his monthly pension have been asked to be withheld for a period of five years. As regards the gratuity amount, it has been ordered that the release of the same can be considered only after conclusion of the another disciplinary proceedings instituted vide Order No. 8/40/94-Vig.II(i) dated 13.07.1994 and Memorandum No.8/40/94-Vig.II(ii) dated 13.7.1994. Being aggrieved by the said order of punishment, the applicant has filed this Original Application u/s.19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with prayers (i) to quash the impugned order of punishment that was passed under Annexure-1 dated 23.4.1996 and (ii) to direct the responde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Cuttack
Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ161CAT
1. Applicant (having been selected, through the Union Public Service Commission, in the year 1967) joined the Indian Forest Service (beings allotted to the Orissa cadre) on 1.7.1968. During his said services he was posted as Managing Director of Orissa Forest Development Corporation Limited with effect from 24.10.1996 where he continued upto 24.8.1999 and, finally, superannuated from service (on reaching the age of retirement) on 31.8.2001. Two years thereafter, a memorandum of charges (under Annexure-1 dated 23.12.2003) was served on the applicant (by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests of Govt. of Orissa, Bhubaneswar) under forwarding letter dated 31.12.2003; alleging commission of irregularities during the period from 24.10.1996 to 24.8.1999. Being aggrieved by the said action/inaction of the respondents, the applicant has filed this original application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with a prayer to set-aside the disciplinary proceedings that ha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Cuttack
Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ219CAT
1. Applicant (Shri A.K. Das), an officer of Orissa Administrative Service (Selection Grade) (in short 'OAS (SC) has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the A.T. Act, 1985, assailing the recommendations of the Selections Committee, which met on 13.5.2003 in terms of the I.A.S (Appointment By Promotion) Regulations, 1955 (in short Regulations, 1955) and recommended a list of officers of Orissa State Civil Services for promotion to the Indian Administrative Service (in short I.A.S) Cadre of Orissa for the year 2002 by ignoring the case of the applicant. He has, therefore, prayed for the following reliefs : "...to quash the proceedings and recommendation of the Selection Committee dated 13.5.2003;...to quash Annexure-10 for the ends of justice; and to direct the respondents (1 to 3) to have fresh/review meetings of the Selection Committee taking the full service particulars of the applicant and respondent Nos. 4 to 10 in accordance to Rules and procedure and recommend his ...
Tag this Judgment!