Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Chandigarh Court April 2005 Judgments Home Cases Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Chandigarh 2005 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.014 seconds)

Mukhtar Ahmad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Reported in : (2006)(1)SLJ24CAT

1. The perpetual dispute of seniority between promotee and direct recruit has again found its echo in this litigation. The applicant is a promotee while respondent No. 7 is a direct recruit. The brief facts leading to this O.A. can be narrated as under: 2. The applicant was appointed as an Investigator in Doordarshan Srinagar on 19.11.77. He was promoted as Research Assistant on 31.12.1983 on ad hoc basis. It appears that he was reverted back to the post of Investigator on 19.3.1986 and thereafter again regularly promoted on 14.8.88 on the recommendation of the DPC and joined the post on 16.2.1989. The relevant recruitment rules known as All India Radio (Group B Post) Recruitment Rules, 1962 and amended vide notification dated 28.6.1985 prescribes the recruitment to the post of Research Assistant (now re-designated as Assistant Research Officer Grade-I) in the following manner: (2) 25% by transfer on deputation/transfer, failing which by direct recruitment, and 3. It appears that in t...